In response to the rt.com report, I can confirm that this blogger will go door to door is necessary to keep the people informed. The more obvious they become, the
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Germany and America were on a collision course on Tuesday night over the handling of Europe's debt crisis after Berlin savaged plans to boost the EU rescue fund as a "stupid idea" and told the White House to sort out its own mess before giving gratuitous advice to others. (Click here for Telegraph full story by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard)
Nigel Farage:Mr Juncker, as President of the Eurogroup, your detachment from reality is almost unbelievable. You're behaving like a political ostrich, pretending none of it is happening.You've just told us just a few moments ago that Greece fundamentally has no problems because she's a member of the eurozone. It's just deluded.And you wrote recently, that the euro's thirteen-year history is a success story. Well, it's a very odd kind of success, isn't it? And actually, saying that beggars belief and I think hardly makes you credible.I think it's about time that you and others in this room woke up to the fact that we are inflicting misery on millions of people; through unemployment, through poverty, through a lack of democracy, and that it's an error to try and keeping countries trapped inside the euro prison.The recent proposal is that Greece should write down her debt by 50% and remain a member of the eurozone. Surely, Mr Juncker if that happenes the same would happen to Portugal and Ireland too.Do you think it's possible for any member state of the euro to write down their debts and stay a member of the euro?Jean Claude Juncker:Mr President, I didn't say that Greece has no problems, I didn't say that. I did say that although Greece is a member of the euro area, Greece is in deep problems. So don't take it the way round that you can put the question you any way had the intention to put.Second point. I don't think that it would be wise and useful for the present euro area to take part in all kind of speculation of the nature of those you were mentioning in your question. The second question was linked to my credibility, as far as I understood. I prefer mine to yours.Nigel Farage:Very good, Mr Juncker. Interesting. Well, on this very point of credibility you yourself said back in April that when things become serious you have to lie. That is what you said back in April. And it seems to me that things are pretty serious and that frankly everything you say is a lie. The euro cannot and should not be held together under its current construction and it's about time you admit it, you and all of you in this room: you've got this wrong and countries like Greece need to be set free.Juncker (through interpreter):President, you've just quoted a newspaper, which wasn't even British - it's a German newspaper - saying that when things get tough we have to lie.Perhaps I should actually quote what I said in the language of the newspaper which you've referred to. The quotation was correct to some extent, but taken out of context.In Brussels I was speaking to the pan-European Movement - these are people who believe in Europe - we have to speak to them sometimes as well.In previous years, back in the days when I was a finance minitser, every few months there was talk about valueing or devalueing currencies in the European currency system. So back then we often used to meet on Sundays for example or just about before the markets closed and at such times it was so difficult for us to tell the truth. However the mistake I made was that by trying to be honest I actually used a form of words which paved the way to your supplementary question.
Basically Junker admits his arrogance and
in white collar speak he also admits he is a lier.
My question is, Why is Mr Junker NOT in Jail?
A message to Channel 4 from the UK Web community.
Every time you bar the UK public from blog content we want to see and especially as the USA and other may see it, It is building up a feeling that "4" is anti it's own UK viewers. Whilst you fob us of with lame legal excuses, the fact remains what you are doing is wrong.
Do what you will with our message, we will find ways to watch a favorite show that usually appears on any of yours through other means, but we shall not watch your network until we may view web content in blog articles posted by our fellow web folk and available to the rest, which is currently restricted to us in the UK.
You have become like our politicians, disconnected, inhuman, we don't trust you, we are beginning to recognize that you are either asleep or corrupt. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
P.S. The world is frankly in deep shit, whilst those that might use platforms like yours to discus what we might all do to fix it, baring the UK public from watching is actually to any rational mind treasonous. Perhaps not actually in law but certainly in spirit.
Interestingly, additional: THREE FORMER BOSSES of Channel 4 yesterday launched a scathing attack on the broadcaster, saying it screened 'crap' programs.
They said Channel 4 had lost its integrity