20 Nov 2015

Shame On Drs And Rabbis For Mutilating Children

"Its time we talked about neonatal genital cutting. Genital mutilation euphemistically called circumcision in the case of males, I will assume you have hear many of the arguments against and supposedly for this practise, I also assume that there are a fair number of MHRAs who don't see this as a men's rights issue for religious or other reasons. Let me just state some of the basics and allow me to move forward with why we will be making this a dominant issue with our activism. I will also explain why we have already begun that activism in earnest. Lets begin with the pro-neonatal cutting argument that the procedure is a prophylactic measure to prevent the specific problems of urinary tract infections, HIV, human papillomavirus, known as HPV and penile cancer.
To be fair an honest there is some medical research that superficially lends credence to these claims. As we often find with assertions though that serve an ideological or financial agenda, when you look at these claims carefully they unravel and fall apart like the alleged gender wage gap. Lets take these claims one by one and see them each through analysis of the US library of medicine and the national institutes for health." Paul Elam.

No comments:

Post a Comment