9 Apr 2018

His Master’s Voice - How An Obedient Dog Goes To War

The Saker: This is really pathetic, but it no less dangerous. First, there was the order given from Above:
Israeli officials: the “U.S. must strike in Syria” because “Assad is the angel of death, and the world would be better without him
Then there was the summoned servant’s immediate reply:
Trump: “Many dead, including women and children, in mindless CHEMICAL attack in Syria. Area of atrocity is in lockdown and encircled by Syrian Army, making it completely inaccessible to outside world. President Putin, Russia and Iran are responsible for backing Animal Assad. Big price” .
The most amazing thing is not that the subservient slave reacted like the subservient slave that he is.  The most amazing thing is that the pretext used in this announced false flag was announced by Nikki Haley at the UNSC on March 12th, almost one month ago!  That, and the fact that Trump probably did not realize that he was told to threaten only Syria and not Russia and Iran.  Although, who knows, maybe the rabidly psychopathic Neocons who now run the White House actually did tell him to bark up Russia and Iran too, I would not put that past them.
There is, of course, the slim chance that just has Trump did absolutely nothing to “Rocket Man” (even though Trump had a “bigger red button”!) he might not do anything to “Animal Assad” either, but frankly I would not recommend placing much faith in that kind of self-restraint.  Why?  Because the AngloZionists are absolutely desperate to prove that they are still relevant, manly and, of course “indispensable”.
Question: how do you really piss off a narcissist?
Answer: ignore him.
Now look at this photo again:
And just imagine how he feels about it:
Thus we have all the elements of a perfect storm.  Trump has a HUGE need to show how manly and tough he is (his wall is a disaster, he wants to send in 4000 troops to protect it), he might be interrogated by Mueller very soon, there is the annoying issue of “Stormy Daniels” still constantly re-heated by the media, and now that certified nutcase McCain is blaming *Trump* for the (completely fake) chemical attack in Syria.  By any measure Trump looks like a pathetic clown and that is not something he can tolerate much longer, especially not when his Israeli Masters are clearly giving him an “out”: strike at Syria and, even better, at the Russians in Syria.
Will the fact that this was all announced by Nikki Haley three weeks ago change anything?
Of course not!
A Ziomedia willing to report the Skripal nonsense with a straight face will also do *exactly* as it is told in this case: they will take it all very seriously, they will even praise Trump, just a little, and they will blame “Animal Assad” and Putin for it all.
After all, if the Russians could use “Novichok and buckwheat” in the UK, why would they not use chemical weapons in Syria?  And, no, the fact that neither the Russians nor the Syrians actually have any chemical weapons (both were fully disarmed and certified as such) makes absolutely no difference!  After all, the Russians never declared their stocks of buckwheat to the OPCW…
The big unknown is what will the Russians do?
As I explained elsewhere, they are in a bind: sinking USN ships or striking USAF bases in the Middle-East would be an act of war, just shoot down some cruise missiles (or render them inoperable by EW means) would be interpreted as a sign of weakness and invite further US escalation.  And yet, again, Moscow is warning of “dire consequences“.
So yes, tonight, yet again, we are headed for war, a war in which Israel will use the USA as its “attack pit-bull” in pursuit of its narrow regional interests (topple Assad, trigger a war with Iran) and thereby put all of mankind at risk.
As Israel Shahak put it so brilliantly: this is a case of “think locally, act globally”.
And the once proud West now silently obeys his Master’s voice.
Disgusting.

Source




Listening to Russian experts - Short report about the mood on Russian prime time TV
The Saker: I just spend about 2 hour listening to a TV debate of Russian experts about what to do about the USA.  Here are a few interesting interesting points.
1) They all agreed that the AngloZionist (of course, they used the words “USA” or “Western countries”) was only going to further escalate and that the only way to stop this is to deliberately bring the world right up to the point were a full-scale US-Russian war was imminent or even locally started.  They said that it was fundamentally wrong for Russia to reply with just words against Western actions.
2) Interestingly, there also was a consensus that even a full-scale US attack on Syria would be too late to change the situation on the ground, that it was way too late for that.
3) Another interesting conclusion was that the only really question for Russia is whether Russia would be better off delaying this maximal crisis or accelerating the events and making everything happen sooner.  There was no consensus on that.
4) Next, there was an consensus view that pleading, reasoning, asking for fairness or justice, or even for common sense, was futile.  The Russian view is simple: the West is ruled by a gang of thugs supported by an infinitely lying and hypocritical media while the general public in the West has been hopelessly zombified.  The authority of the so-called “western values” (democracy, rule of law, human rights, etc.) in Russia is now roadkill.
5) There was also a broad consensus that the US elites are not taking Russia seriously and that the current Russian diplomatic efforts are futile (especially towards the UK).  The only way to change that would be with very harsh measures, including diplomatic and military ones.  Everybody agreed that talking with Boris Johnson would be not only a total waste of time, but a huge mistake.
6) To my amazement, the notion that Russia might have to sink a few USN ships or use Kalibers on US forces in the Middle-East was viewed as a real, maybe inevitable, option.  Really – nobody objected.
Reach your own conclusions.  I will just say that none of the “experts” was representing, or working for, the Russian government.  Government experts not only have better info, they also know that the lives of millions of people depend on their decisions, which is not the case for the so-called “experts”. Still, the words of these experts do reflect, I think, a growing popular consensus.

Source

 

No comments:

Post a Comment