Paternity: Progress Opportunity For Unmarried UK Fathers

'In English law a biological father has no right to be recognised legally as the father via the legal status of PR [Parental Responsibility].'

By MRA-UK: In this post I draw attention to a little known feature of existing primary legislation concerning the recognition of a man as the father of a child, that is, having Parental Responsibility.

One of the signature issues which, alone , would be sufficient to justify a men’s movement, is the extent to which women control men’s fertility and paternity. A woman automatically has Parental Responsibility (PR) for a child to whom she gives birth. A man has PR if he is married to the mother when the child is born, or if he is named on the birth certificate as the father. Note that neither of these conditions relates to biological (i.e., genetic) fatherhood.

In English law a biological father has no right to be recognised legally as the father via the legal status of PR. If he is not married to the mother, then – short of obtaining a court order – his legal status as a father is entirely dependent on the mother’s consent. If she does not want him to be recognised as the father then she is legally entitled to prevent it and he can override this only via a court order.

The Jews Treat Palestinians The Way They Pretend German National Socialist Workers [AKA The Nazis] Treated Them

We're told that the German National Socialist Workers' Party who nationalised formerly Jewish owned German Banking [thereafter known via Jew owned Hollywood as the bad guys, "The Nazis"] had “the Jewish problem.” The real problem being that after the Jewish bankster monkey was shaken from the Germans' backs by the German workers, creating the so-called economic miracle, the Jews then used their control of Western banking to mobilise the rest of us to attack Germany and her allies, aka WWII.

We know that colonialist Jews today have “the Palestinian problem.” The problem being that the indigenous Gentiles of Palestine won’t simply lay down and die, so the Jews have had to commit to their slow motion genocide.

The Jews had a similar problem with the Russian Tsar as they had with German socialists so they slaughtered his family along with over 100 million Russian Christians. The Jews think they’re the chosen ones and so by proxy have a problem with all Gentiles so they were quite happy to monopolise white and black slavery for over 400 years until white protestants put an end to it. …I see a pattern. - Angelos G. Agathangelou

By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts: Were told that the so-called Nazis had “the Jewish problem.”  We know that the Jews today have “the Palestinian problem.” https://www.rt.com/op-ed/521305-israeli-settlers-palestinians-violence/ 

The Political Economy Of Fear

Were we ever to stop being afraid of the government itself and to cast off the phoney fears it has fostered, the government would shrivel and die...

[S]ince love and fear can hardly exist together, if we must choose between them, it is far safer to be feared than loved. - Niccolò Machiavelli, The Prince, 1513

Authored by Robert Higgs: All animals experience fear - human beings, perhaps, most of all. Any animal incapable of fear would have been hard pressed to survive, regardless of its size, speed, or other attributes. Fear alerts us to dangers that threaten our well-being and sometimes our very lives. Sensing fear, we respond by running away, by hiding, or by preparing to ward off the danger.

To disregard fear is to place ourselves in possibly mortal jeopardy. Even the man who acts heroically on the battlefield, if he is honest, admits that he is scared. To tell people not to be afraid is to give them advice that they cannot take. Our evolved physiological makeup disposes us to fear all sorts of actual and potential threats, even those that exist only in our imagination.

Rustic & Elite: Appreciating Men’s Unity In Diversity

'With their unity in diversity, all men are as fully worthy of love as the rustic men in De rustico and De clericis et rustico.'

By Author Douglas Galbi: As the brilliant twelfth-century poem About Three Young Women {De tribus puellis} indicates, medieval Latin literature appreciated men as distinctively male human beings. The most learned and perceptive men in medieval Europe didn’t believe that women are necessary to civilize and ennoble men. Yet overcoming prejudice against men’s gender-distinctiveness has never been easy. Composed between the fourth and the ninth centuries, the poem About a Rustic {De rustico} superficially suggests a rustic man’s inferiority to an elite, urbane man. In De rustico, the urbane man wildly and crudely demeans and dehumanizes the rustic man using masculine stereotypes from Verses for Pan {Versus Panos}. The twelfth-century dialogue About Clerics and a Rustic {De clericis et rustico} presents a self-centered rustic as shrewder than elite clerics and equally cultured. Today, young men who reject men’s burdensome gender responsibilities are disparaged as being afflicted with the “Peter Pan syndrome” and “failure to launch.” With their unity in diversity, all men are as fully worthy of love as the rustic men in De rustico and De clericis et rustico.