Are we being collectively herded into a way of life by a particular
group of people, are they continually repeating the same methods for
massaging public opinion? Whether it is to remove Iraq war opposition
(Bali) or to civilize the Afghanis (911) or to remove the weapons from
Americans (Sandy Hook)? Source
Telling the truth has become a revolutionary act, so let us salute those who disclose the necessary facts.
14 Jan 2013
Inflation Propaganda Exposed
Invasion of the body-politic snatchers
The Slog: During the last Government, there were many cries of foul about the
number of unelected advisers popping up all over the place. The most
infamously dense and dangerous of these was Lord Birt, a man who once
proposed to Tony Blair a reform whereby the whole “system of government
could be speeded up” if some Cabinet votes were allowed to replace a
majority in Parliament. He was a man ahead of his time, Birt.
The trend was, many of us protested, oligarchy and kitchen Cabinet rule by the back door. But in 2013, the present Government airily invites them through the front door, and simply ignores the criticism.
The latest example of the syndrome in the DfE is perhaps the most brazen so far. Michael Gove’s appointment of Conservative donor and private education enthusiast John Nash as an education minister had this tweet getting record RT numbers on Twitter two days ago: ‘Venture capitalist donates £300k to Tories. Takes on academy. Gets life peerage. Becomes education minister’. Just when you thought there was no point to Twitter, you realise there is.
Thus the privatisation of politics continues apace, and lobbying rules the roost: give £3.5m to the Conservatives, get planning laws relaxed; make Bottomley your discreet private health sector cypher in the Lords, make sure her acolyte Hunt gets the Health secretaryship, get lots of cooperation from rich private health insurers; support Murdoch’s bid for BSkyB, get Newscorp support for the Tory election bid. ‘Open for business’ is the new graft.
The trend was, many of us protested, oligarchy and kitchen Cabinet rule by the back door. But in 2013, the present Government airily invites them through the front door, and simply ignores the criticism.
The latest example of the syndrome in the DfE is perhaps the most brazen so far. Michael Gove’s appointment of Conservative donor and private education enthusiast John Nash as an education minister had this tweet getting record RT numbers on Twitter two days ago: ‘Venture capitalist donates £300k to Tories. Takes on academy. Gets life peerage. Becomes education minister’. Just when you thought there was no point to Twitter, you realise there is.
Thus the privatisation of politics continues apace, and lobbying rules the roost: give £3.5m to the Conservatives, get planning laws relaxed; make Bottomley your discreet private health sector cypher in the Lords, make sure her acolyte Hunt gets the Health secretaryship, get lots of cooperation from rich private health insurers; support Murdoch’s bid for BSkyB, get Newscorp support for the Tory election bid. ‘Open for business’ is the new graft.
Tawergha: Libya's Dirty Secret in Focus
Noam Chomsky: "The Emerging World Order: its roots, our legacy"
SISSAschool: On September 17, 2012, Noam Chomsky held a public lecture with the title
"The Emerging World Order: its roots, our legacy" at Politeama Rossetti
in Trieste. Source
French Mali Intervention a Disaster - Yahya
'Marriagephile, not homophobe': Hundreds of thousands protest against gay marriage law in Paris
The protesters, many of whom travelled from outside the capital, formed three columns that converged at the Eiffel Tower.
"We love homosexuals but a child must be born from a man and a woman, and the law must respect that,” said Frigide Barjot, the alter ego of comedian Virginie Tellene, the intentionally apolitical face of the protest.
Assad enjoys support of millions across Syria: Mimi al-Laham (aka Syrian Girl)
Remembering Aaron Swartz - Commons man
Most of this he did for little or no compensation. One exception was Reddit, though he later sounded almost contrite about the riches showered on him and his colleagues by Condé Nast, the publisher of Vogue and over a dozen other prominent lifestyle magazines, which bought the popular social news site in 2006. In any case, he wasn't a good fit for corporate life, he said, and left a few months later—or, depending on whom you talk to, was asked to leave. But the cash did let him focus on his relentless struggle to liberate data for online masses to enjoy for free.
CEO of German Multinational: Costs Of Monetary Union Too High
By Wolf Richter: Bernd Scheifele, CEO of HeidelbergCement—one of the world’s largest
producers of construction materials with nearly 55,000 employees at
2,500 locations in over 40 countries—lashed out against European
politicians and their inability to bring budgets under control. But he
reserved the most devastating judgment for the euro itself.
HeidelbergCement’s long history—it was founded in 1873—almost ended during the financial crisis. For more than 100 years, the company had expanded in Germany. But in 1977, it began to branch out internationally by acquiring Vicat in France and Lehigh Cement in the US. At the end of the 1980s, it invested heavily in Central and Eastern Europe, then moved via acquisitions into Northern Europe, Africa, and Asia—piling on debt as it went. The acquisition spree culminated in 2007, when it paid GBP 9.5 billion for Hansen plc., a British company with 26,000 employees. HeidelbergCement had become one of the world’s largest producers of cements and aggregates, the two key raw materials for concrete.
Then the financial crisis unfolded. Worldwide revenues dropped from €14.2 billion in 2008 to €11.1 billion in 2009, and net profits from €1.92 billion to €168 million. Staggering under nearly €12 billion in net debt, the company laid off 15,000 people. Shares plunged from €120 in May 2007 to €20 in early 2009. Credit became scarce. On the verge of bankruptcy, the company underwent some financial re-engineering that included a capital increase and the issuance of 62.5 million new shares.
It survived. By December 2011, revenues had recovered to €12.9 billion. Net profit approached €1 billion. Net debt had been reduced to €7.8 billion. And shares have more than doubled since their 2009 lows.
“The result of hard work, hard efforts to save money,” Scheifele told the FAZ. The crisis, “an absolutely exceptional situation,” had surprised him. Until then, he said, it was “hard to imagine” that sales would plunge “in almost all countries simultaneously.” But they did.
HeidelbergCement’s long history—it was founded in 1873—almost ended during the financial crisis. For more than 100 years, the company had expanded in Germany. But in 1977, it began to branch out internationally by acquiring Vicat in France and Lehigh Cement in the US. At the end of the 1980s, it invested heavily in Central and Eastern Europe, then moved via acquisitions into Northern Europe, Africa, and Asia—piling on debt as it went. The acquisition spree culminated in 2007, when it paid GBP 9.5 billion for Hansen plc., a British company with 26,000 employees. HeidelbergCement had become one of the world’s largest producers of cements and aggregates, the two key raw materials for concrete.
Then the financial crisis unfolded. Worldwide revenues dropped from €14.2 billion in 2008 to €11.1 billion in 2009, and net profits from €1.92 billion to €168 million. Staggering under nearly €12 billion in net debt, the company laid off 15,000 people. Shares plunged from €120 in May 2007 to €20 in early 2009. Credit became scarce. On the verge of bankruptcy, the company underwent some financial re-engineering that included a capital increase and the issuance of 62.5 million new shares.
It survived. By December 2011, revenues had recovered to €12.9 billion. Net profit approached €1 billion. Net debt had been reduced to €7.8 billion. And shares have more than doubled since their 2009 lows.
“The result of hard work, hard efforts to save money,” Scheifele told the FAZ. The crisis, “an absolutely exceptional situation,” had surprised him. Until then, he said, it was “hard to imagine” that sales would plunge “in almost all countries simultaneously.” But they did.
What Happens When China Goes “Gray”?
By Mark W. Frazier: Developed economies are beginning to struggle with aging populations and more retirees. China may soon join them.
As China's major trading partners try to control rising public pension and health care costs, they may not realize they also have an important stake in China's ongoing struggle to fashion a safety net for its own rapidly aging population. Many observers assume China has no pensions or healthcare insurance for the 185 million people over the age of 60 (13.7% of population), the highest official retirement age for most workers. They may well believe this explains why Chinese families save so much–more than 30% of household income–and therefore spend less on consumer goods, including imports from trading partners.But this line of reasoning is faulty because China already has large and rapidly growing public pension and health insurance programs in the cities, and is in the process of extending them to rural areas. It's time that China's trading partners, especially the United States, understand what this means for China's economic future and, by extension, their own.
Scientists warn Obama administration about climate change in new draft report
By Marco Volpe: The National Climate Assessment has sounded the alarm to the US
government with a new draft report over 1,000 pages long about the
dangers of the intensification of global warming in the upcoming years
and decades.
Editor’s note: for a dissenting opinion, see this opinion article. If you agree or disagree you’re free to submit your own article on this or any other subject.
On the scent of the dramatic report by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which flagged 2012 as the hottest year on record by far, Obama is facing still more pressure on the climate issue.
An over 1,000-page report by the National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee, called “the National Climate Assessment,” has urged the White House to take immediate action to curb the intensification of global warming.
The report made clear that the steps taken by Obama so far to slow down emissions have not been “close to sufficient”.
The body’s findings aren’t original, stressing the effects of the anthropogenic impact on the environment, such as the rise of weather extremes and the rise of the sea level.
The assessment said that temperatures will keep rising and offered different scenarios for the future — including temperatures rising between 2.8 to 5.6 degrees Celsius (or an increase between around 5 to 10 degrees Fahrenheit) after 2050 if emissions climb further.
Editor’s note: for a dissenting opinion, see this opinion article. If you agree or disagree you’re free to submit your own article on this or any other subject.
On the scent of the dramatic report by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which flagged 2012 as the hottest year on record by far, Obama is facing still more pressure on the climate issue.
An over 1,000-page report by the National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee, called “the National Climate Assessment,” has urged the White House to take immediate action to curb the intensification of global warming.
The report made clear that the steps taken by Obama so far to slow down emissions have not been “close to sufficient”.
The body’s findings aren’t original, stressing the effects of the anthropogenic impact on the environment, such as the rise of weather extremes and the rise of the sea level.
The assessment said that temperatures will keep rising and offered different scenarios for the future — including temperatures rising between 2.8 to 5.6 degrees Celsius (or an increase between around 5 to 10 degrees Fahrenheit) after 2050 if emissions climb further.