Telling the truth has become a revolutionary act, so let us salute those who disclose the necessary facts.
28 Feb 2013
Billionaires for Austerity: With Cuts Looming, Wall Street Roots of "Fix the Debt" Campaign Exposed
The Media Doesn’t Matter Trend: Beppe Grillo Proves It
By Gerald Celente: The
spectacular showing by Beppe Grillo’s Movimento 5 Stelle, which just
won more votes in Italy’s general election than any other single party,
represents a brand new, powerful, double-barreled trend that will
reshape the way political campaigns are run and, in so doing, will
reshape the future.
The
unanticipated results sent a shock wave across Italy and rattled world
equity markets. Taking 180 of Parliament’s 630 seats, Grillo’s party
amassed enough votes to not only deny front runner Pier Luigi Bersani
the clear majority needed to form a working government, it also sent an
even louder message to the entire eurozone: Adesso basta – enough is enough!
Faced
with the prospect of still-higher taxes and more German-inspired
austerity-as-usual, the Five Star Movement’s
anti-establishment/anti-austerity populist showing far exceeded the
predictions of the media, pollsters and politicians.
The
resurgence of the embattled and disgraced media tycoon Silvio
Berlusconi was also unanticipated. But his strong showing was less a
sign of popular support than the consequence of the mogul’s overt
multi-media-vote-buying campaign, promising amnesty for tax evaders and a
$5 billion tax refund to property owners.
Trend 1: Media Doesn’t Matter Beppe
Grillo, unlike all the other candidates, spurned Italian TV and instead
built his personal presence and party strength via a 73-stop
barnstorming tour and a brilliantly orchestrated Internet campaign. Nine
months ago he was polling only 5 percent nationally. With the largest
social media following of any politician in Europe, Grillo’s “head on
the Internet, feet on the ground” rise to prominence was generated
through his one million Facebook and Twitter friends and followers.
This is the trend of the future!
Australia central-bank documents strip some mystery from currency
Sarah Turner: The Reserve Bank of Australia issued a clutch of documents on
Thursday under the Freedom of Information Act in which it gave its
opinion on everything from which of the world’s central banks are
holders of the Australian currency to whether the Aussie dollar is
overvalued.
According to the RBA, neither the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan, the Bank of England nor the Bank of Canada have Australian dollars (or in other words, Australian sovereign bonds) in their vaults.
The RBA said it was their “best guess” that none of the above monetary authorities – as well as another 16 central to boot – hold the Australian currency, though they cautioned that “timely, reliable information is quite difficult to come by.”
At the same time, the RBA said another 16 central banks have publicly reported that they hold Australian dollars, while a further 18 “appear to hold Australian dollars.”
In the RBA’s Australian-dollar-holder category were the monetary authorities of Hong Kong, Switzerland, Brazil, the Russian Federation and Sweden. In the “maybe” category were those of China, France, Germany, India and Indonesia. The “unknowns” included Greece, Bulgaria, Portugal, Spain and Egypt.
But the RBA shied away from any definitive statements on who holds its currency now, warning that “any recent changes in reserve composition will not be reflected,” given that the data were collected from central-bank annual reports, “in most cases for 2011.”
Foreign central banks were believed to be buying the Australian dollar for its yield, as the interest rates on the Australian debt that the central banks would hold are often much higher than those of many other countries.
According to the RBA, neither the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan, the Bank of England nor the Bank of Canada have Australian dollars (or in other words, Australian sovereign bonds) in their vaults.
The RBA said it was their “best guess” that none of the above monetary authorities – as well as another 16 central to boot – hold the Australian currency, though they cautioned that “timely, reliable information is quite difficult to come by.”
At the same time, the RBA said another 16 central banks have publicly reported that they hold Australian dollars, while a further 18 “appear to hold Australian dollars.”
In the RBA’s Australian-dollar-holder category were the monetary authorities of Hong Kong, Switzerland, Brazil, the Russian Federation and Sweden. In the “maybe” category were those of China, France, Germany, India and Indonesia. The “unknowns” included Greece, Bulgaria, Portugal, Spain and Egypt.
But the RBA shied away from any definitive statements on who holds its currency now, warning that “any recent changes in reserve composition will not be reflected,” given that the data were collected from central-bank annual reports, “in most cases for 2011.”
Foreign central banks were believed to be buying the Australian dollar for its yield, as the interest rates on the Australian debt that the central banks would hold are often much higher than those of many other countries.
The 5 Stages of Economic Collapse: Financial, Commercial, Political, Social & Cultural – Where is the U.S. Now? + Response
munknee: Having given a lot of thought to both the differences and the
similarities between Russia and the U.S. - the one that has collapsed
already, and the one that is collapsing as I write this – I feel
ready…to define five stages of collapse to serve as mental milestones as
we gauge our own collapse-preparedness and see what can be done to
improve it. So writes Dmitry Orlov in edited excerpts from his original article* entitled Five Stages of Collapse.
Orlov goes on to say, in part:
…The proposed taxonomy ties each of the five collapse
stages to the breaching of a specific level of trust, or faith, in the
status quo. Although each stage causes physical, observable changes in
the environment, these can be gradual…
The 5 Stages of Collapse
Stage 1: Financial collapse
Faith in “business as usual” is lost. The future is no
longer assumed [to] resemble the past in any way that allows risk to be
assessed and financial assets to be guaranteed. Financial institutions
become insolvent; savings are wiped out, and access to capital is lost.
Stage 2: Commercial collapse
Faith that “the market shall provide” is lost. Money is
devalued and/or becomes scarce, commodities are hoarded, import and
retail chains break down, and widespread shortages of survival
necessities become the norm.
Stage 3: Political collapse
Faith that “the government will take care of you” is lost.
As official attempts to mitigate widespread loss of access to commercial
sources of survival necessities fail to make a difference, the
political establishment loses legitimacy and relevance.
The Vatican crumbles as the clown prince grabs the party hat
By Richard Cottrell: The reigning pope becomes the first in 600 years to hand back the Red
Velvet Slippers (“I don’t think we’re in the Vatican any more Toto”).
The Lateran State seethes with omens and portents that his successor
will be black and call himself Peter the Second, according to the
predictions of ancient Irish sage and regular bookies’ favorite.
Even as the cardinals cluster in their crisply pressed crimson party frocks and white pinafores, ready for the solemn conclave and the white smoke, the Holy See resembles the German Democratic Republic in its last, doomed days.
Spies from the Vatican secret police scour the corridors searching for priests performing acts that priests are not supposed to perform. The daily business of the Vatican, it seems, is not so much solemn prayer as having it off on a grand scale, and on a fairly ambidextrous basis at that. Is nothing sacred?
Informants and counter-informants gush to the media that at least half the clergy are homosexuals and the other half are playing straight. The Vatican, it seems, is collectively in heat, whichever way you consider matters.
One ex-Dominican monk claims that almost a majority of the recruits to Catholic seminaries are principally engaged in seeking gay heaven. Another quite senior cleric states that he sees nothing wrong in particular with an endless round of parties at which sex in one form or another is the prize attraction, since ‘everyone in Rome knows about it.’
Even as the cardinals cluster in their crisply pressed crimson party frocks and white pinafores, ready for the solemn conclave and the white smoke, the Holy See resembles the German Democratic Republic in its last, doomed days.
Spies from the Vatican secret police scour the corridors searching for priests performing acts that priests are not supposed to perform. The daily business of the Vatican, it seems, is not so much solemn prayer as having it off on a grand scale, and on a fairly ambidextrous basis at that. Is nothing sacred?
Informants and counter-informants gush to the media that at least half the clergy are homosexuals and the other half are playing straight. The Vatican, it seems, is collectively in heat, whichever way you consider matters.
One ex-Dominican monk claims that almost a majority of the recruits to Catholic seminaries are principally engaged in seeking gay heaven. Another quite senior cleric states that he sees nothing wrong in particular with an endless round of parties at which sex in one form or another is the prize attraction, since ‘everyone in Rome knows about it.’
Rand Paul’s Third Letter to the CIA: Can You Kill with Drones in the USA?
By Michael Krieger: This letter is a few days old, but is very important for every
American to be aware of. Essentially, Rand Paul is threatening to
filibuster Barack Obama’s nominee for the CIA, John Brennan, due to his
refusal to answer a simple question:
Do you believe that the President has the power to authorize lethal force, such as a drone strike, against a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil, and without trial?
This should not be a complicated question to answer, yet it seems Obama, Brennan and pretty much every other little power consumed bureaucrat is incapable of doing so. Below is Rand Paul’s letter reprinted in full (my emphasis added).
Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20500
Dear Mr. Brennan,
In consideration of your nomination to be Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), I have repeatedly requested that you provide answers to several questions clarifying your role in the approval of lethal force against terrorism suspects, particularly those who are U.S. citizens. Your past actions in this regard, as well as your view of the limitations to which you are subject, are of critical importance in assessing your qualifications to lead the CIA. If it is not clear that you will honor the limits placed upon the Executive Branch by the Constitution, then the Senate should not confirm you to lead the CIA.
Do you believe that the President has the power to authorize lethal force, such as a drone strike, against a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil, and without trial?
This should not be a complicated question to answer, yet it seems Obama, Brennan and pretty much every other little power consumed bureaucrat is incapable of doing so. Below is Rand Paul’s letter reprinted in full (my emphasis added).
February 20, 2013
John O. BrennanAssistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20500
Dear Mr. Brennan,
In consideration of your nomination to be Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), I have repeatedly requested that you provide answers to several questions clarifying your role in the approval of lethal force against terrorism suspects, particularly those who are U.S. citizens. Your past actions in this regard, as well as your view of the limitations to which you are subject, are of critical importance in assessing your qualifications to lead the CIA. If it is not clear that you will honor the limits placed upon the Executive Branch by the Constitution, then the Senate should not confirm you to lead the CIA.
USA Police State: DHS states electronic devices can be seized at or somewhat near borders for any reason
By Brent Daggett: The Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (which could be considered an oxymoron by some), in a two-page executive summary, revealed travelers near the nation’s borders can have their electronic devices seized for any reason.
In 2009, the DHS, one of the responsibilities of which is securing our borders, stated it would conduct a “Civil Liberties Assessment” into its policy of suspicionless search-and-seizures of electronic devices.
While the assessment was originally supposed to be delivered in around 120 days, it actually took three years of waiting before the review was issued.
“We also conclude that imposing a requirement that officers have reasonable suspicion in order to conduct a border search of an electronic device would be operationally harmful without concomitant civil rights/civil liberties benefits,” the executive summary stated.
The suspicionless search-and-seizure policy began in 2008 under the Bush administration.
In that year, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), an agency under the umbrella of the DHS, declared CBP had the right to search laptops, electronic devices and printed material of any traveler (U.S. citizen or non-citizen) at the border, “absent individualized suspicion.”
In 2009, the DHS, one of the responsibilities of which is securing our borders, stated it would conduct a “Civil Liberties Assessment” into its policy of suspicionless search-and-seizures of electronic devices.
While the assessment was originally supposed to be delivered in around 120 days, it actually took three years of waiting before the review was issued.
“We also conclude that imposing a requirement that officers have reasonable suspicion in order to conduct a border search of an electronic device would be operationally harmful without concomitant civil rights/civil liberties benefits,” the executive summary stated.
The suspicionless search-and-seizure policy began in 2008 under the Bush administration.
In that year, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), an agency under the umbrella of the DHS, declared CBP had the right to search laptops, electronic devices and printed material of any traveler (U.S. citizen or non-citizen) at the border, “absent individualized suspicion.”
Taking Away Our Instincts And Intuition
Founded By Geniuses And Run By Idiots - Monty Pelerin's World
H. L. Mencken correctly observed:
Government is actually the worst failure of civilized man. There has never been a really good one, and even those that are most tolerable are arbitrary, cruel, grasping and unintelligent.Mencken also was prescient:
As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their hearts desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.But this is not about Mr. Mencken. Rather it is about some unknown individual who committed the following to the email world:
Food for thought…
- If you can get arrested for hunting or fishing without a license, but not for being in the country illegally … you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.
- If you have to get your parents’ permission to go on a field trip or take an aspirin in school, but not to get an abortion … you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.
- If the only school curriculum allowed to explain how we got here is evolution, but the government stops a $15 million construction project to keep a rare spider from evolving to extinction … you might live in a country founded by geniuses but run by idiots.
THE PEOPLE v THE BANKS: Conviction beats Eviction
Equity aids the vigilant, not he who sleeps on his rights...