Telling the truth has become a revolutionary act, so let us salute those who disclose the necessary facts.
25 May 2013
Drowning In Central Banking Abyss - Max Keiser with Jim Rickards
THE PAEDOFILE: Why exactly was this particular fellow chosen to adjudicate in the McAlpine-Bercow case?
The Slog: Tediously, a very poor legal judgement earlier in this truly
depressing week for justice forces me to make one thing clear at the
outset of this post. After extensive enquiries, and genuinely to the
very best of my knowledge, I do not think that Lord McAlpine has any
history whatsoever of paedophile tendencies. So the fact that his name
appears in the same headline as the jeu de mot ‘Paedofile’ should not be taken, by hearse-following legal vultures, to mean that any libel is involved here.
I do think that, in the familial sense, Lord Ally McAlpine has been shall we way somewhat discreet since he was falsely accused of infant-buggery; but that is an entirely separate issue. No – this piece is about the continuing inability of the British to come to terms with the sex-maniacs in their midst.
We are a hopelessly divided country, I’m afraid. The Daily Telegraph columnist Graeme Archer, for instance, writes about the Bercow judgement today. He seems like a jolly good egg - but I’m quite certain that he is allowing the ‘form’ of Sally’s Silly Tweet to override the content of it. A no more than adequate defence team (and that lets Carter-Ruck off the hook, I’m led to understand) could have argued that she was commenting upon a trend, not opining upon – let alone suggesting – guilt.
I do think that, in the familial sense, Lord Ally McAlpine has been shall we way somewhat discreet since he was falsely accused of infant-buggery; but that is an entirely separate issue. No – this piece is about the continuing inability of the British to come to terms with the sex-maniacs in their midst.
We are a hopelessly divided country, I’m afraid. The Daily Telegraph columnist Graeme Archer, for instance, writes about the Bercow judgement today. He seems like a jolly good egg - but I’m quite certain that he is allowing the ‘form’ of Sally’s Silly Tweet to override the content of it. A no more than adequate defence team (and that lets Carter-Ruck off the hook, I’m led to understand) could have argued that she was commenting upon a trend, not opining upon – let alone suggesting – guilt.
The Fiat End Game: Preparing For A Way Forward
Monsanto promotes GMO abroad with US tax money!
Our System is So Flawed That Fraud is Mathematically Guaranteed
The inevitable consequences of a global rush from reality
The Slog: I could give you a hundred reasons why
globalised mercantilism is fatally flawed, but it’s more detail than
anyone needs. This essay isn’t an attempt to offer The Explanation of
Everything, but rather a clearly evidenced summary of the fundamental
“page one” reasons why globalism per se is:
* Based on a silly idea
* Executed using a discredited model
* Run by those with no thought for the consequences
* Far too big to control
* Incapable of evoking global responses
A silly idea
Ted Levitt was a highly intelligent man who
posited the idea that Homo sapiens was about to grow beyond cultural
influence and become One Species. He came to this conclusion because he
spent far too much time flying around in the company of multinational
executives with the same deluded idea as him. He also did so because he
was a Harvard Professor teaching economics who knew nothing about
cultural psychology or social anthropology.
George Galloway speaks about Woolwich murder
Japan + other markets drop, US QE might stop
Jack Lew's Triple Whammy - IRS Ignorance, Corzine Corruption, And The 'War On The Poor'
Rand Paul introduces bill to extend Fourth Amendment protection to electronic communications
Madison Ruppert: Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) has introduced legislation that seeks to extend Fourth Amendment protection to electronic communications, which if successful would be a major move to protect online privacy.
This comes after it was revealed that both the IRS and the FBI claimed they did not need a warrant to spy on the electronic communications of Americans.
However, some might be skeptical given Paul’s much-criticized apparent flip-flop on the drone issue.
Nonetheless, Paul has made some much needed statements about the lack of protection given to the private electronic communications of the American people.
“In today’s high-tech world, we must ensure that all forms of communication are protected,” Paul said in a press release. “Yet government has eroded protecting the Fourth Amendment over the past few decades, especially when applied to electronic communications and third party providers.”
The Fourth Amendment is supposed to protect the American people from unreasonable search and seizure, though that has been undermined quite a bit.
This comes after it was revealed that both the IRS and the FBI claimed they did not need a warrant to spy on the electronic communications of Americans.
However, some might be skeptical given Paul’s much-criticized apparent flip-flop on the drone issue.
Nonetheless, Paul has made some much needed statements about the lack of protection given to the private electronic communications of the American people.
“In today’s high-tech world, we must ensure that all forms of communication are protected,” Paul said in a press release. “Yet government has eroded protecting the Fourth Amendment over the past few decades, especially when applied to electronic communications and third party providers.”
The Fourth Amendment is supposed to protect the American people from unreasonable search and seizure, though that has been undermined quite a bit.