Telling the truth has become a revolutionary act, so let us salute those who disclose the necessary facts.
21 Jul 2013
Anti-Islam demo turns violent in UK
The New (Ab)normal: When 200 People Have More Wealth Than 3,500,000,000
Submitted by Tyler Durden: The following brief video created by TheRules.org, using data sourced
from this website, is the latest vivid demonstration of the most
adverse (and dangerous) side effect of nearly five years, and counting,
of global monetary intervention by central banks: a world in which the
poor get poorer, the rich get richer, and the middle class disappears.
The video's punchline "The richest 300 people on earth have as much wealth as the poorest 3 billion" is not exactly correct: in truth the situation is even worse: the richest 200 people have about $2.7 trillion, which is more than the poorest 3.5 billion people, who have only $2.2 trillion combined.
Our chortling UK Prime Minister: come all ye paedophiles and merchants of death, and find ye sanctuary there +
The Slog: I have to fess up and say that, what with world market developments,
the accelerating EU slide into shitfarce, rage at the blood transfusion
issue, starting a pressure group and – most important of all – the
arrival of my granddaughter down here, the unpleasant Mr Lynton Crosby
was but a small blip on the outer ring of my steam-driven radar. The
return of the first Slog grandchild has been an unalloyed joy, made even
more profound by the awareness that, at any time, I can hand her back
to the parents. But she truly is a little belter.
However, as little Lyla Murphy took her first dip in a grown-up pool, a Michael Deacon tweet alerted me to the fact that David Cameron had been on Andrew Marr this morning. I make a point of never, ever watching shows on telly where pols are interviewed, because the cost of replacing axed televisions was getting too much for my meagre Zirped investment income and QE-screwed pension to bear. But there was something in the Deacon deadpan that made me find a link, and watch it.
However, as little Lyla Murphy took her first dip in a grown-up pool, a Michael Deacon tweet alerted me to the fact that David Cameron had been on Andrew Marr this morning. I make a point of never, ever watching shows on telly where pols are interviewed, because the cost of replacing axed televisions was getting too much for my meagre Zirped investment income and QE-screwed pension to bear. But there was something in the Deacon deadpan that made me find a link, and watch it.
The Power Of Gold & An Economic Collapse
Gerald Celente: “That’s what he (Bernanke) said, ‘Nobody
understands gold prices.’ He also called gold, I love this one, ‘An
unusual asset.’ And he said that some people see gold as ‘disaster
insurance.’ Yes, disaster insurance against what people like him and
other central bankers are doing -- creating a global disaster by
printing all of this digital money....
Great Job, Feminists (and SJMs) + Masturbation: The Beautiful Reality Response
David Cameron, Lynton Crosby involved in serious fraud - BBC Sucks O Cocks News
The artist taxi driver
"Watching TV is like looking down the barrel of a gun!"
"This is a conspiracy to defraud the public. This is not a recession, it's a fucking robbery! CALL THE FUCKING COPS!"
"Watching TV is like looking down the barrel of a gun!"
"This is a conspiracy to defraud the public. This is not a recession, it's a fucking robbery! CALL THE FUCKING COPS!"
Krishnamurti, Thought & Enlightenment - Alexander Barry
MIC Global Gulag: WAS HE RIGHT?
The Burning Platform: Ron Paul wrote this scathing assessment and prediction about the
newly created DHS eleven years ago. He was outraged by the $3 billion
price tag. The DHS 2014 budget is $60 billion. Were his warnings about
the American people being spied on by our government accurate? Are you
safer today than you were in 2002? Do you have more or less liberty and
freedom than you had in 2002? Was it worth it?
The Homeland Security Monstrosity
Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX)
November 19, 2002
Congress spent just a few short hours last week voting to create the biggest new federal bureaucracy since World War II, not that the media or even most members of Congress paid much attention to the process. Yet our most basic freedoms as Americans – privacy in our homes, persons, and possessions; confidentiality in our financial and medical affairs; openness in our conversations, telephone, and internet use; unfettered travel; indeed the basic freedom not to be monitored as we go through our daily lives – have been dramatically changed.
The Homeland Security Monstrosity
Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX)
November 19, 2002
Congress spent just a few short hours last week voting to create the biggest new federal bureaucracy since World War II, not that the media or even most members of Congress paid much attention to the process. Yet our most basic freedoms as Americans – privacy in our homes, persons, and possessions; confidentiality in our financial and medical affairs; openness in our conversations, telephone, and internet use; unfettered travel; indeed the basic freedom not to be monitored as we go through our daily lives – have been dramatically changed.