11 Oct 2013
Jesse Ventura for President + The Golden Jackass
The NWO: Investigation launched in Luxembourg over Skype’s links to NSA surveillance programs
The link between the NSA and Skype is hardly secret at this point, especially given the exposure of “Project Chess,” the secret program aimed at making Skype calls easily available to intelligence agencies.
Furthermore, in early June it was revealed that Skype was one of the partners working with the NSA on their massive Prism program.
Skype, owned by Microsoft, could face both administrative and criminal sanctions, including a ban on secretly passing any user communications to US intelligence agencies, the Guardian reports.
If the investigation finds that Skype’s data sharing is found to violate Luxembourg’s data protection laws, the company, headquartered in the European country, could also be fined.
Misandry: NCFM advisory to university fraternities + RBK's channel flagged down, sub the new one
A Voice for Men: Recently, there were two alleged incidents of sexual assault at
Montana State University Bozeman frat houses resulting in the university
temporarily suspending both fraternities.
Universities and national fraternities frequently suspend fraternity
chapters in similar situations to prevent future allegations and
occurrences if indeed there were actual occurrences in the first place,
quell public demonization, minimize risks, appease feminists, cower to
the onerous oversight of the Federal Department of Education, and above
all, protect their funding.
However, simply banning women from the implicated fraternities until
investigations were completed and any corrective steps were taken would
have protected the rights of all involved without condemning entire
fraternities through guilt by association, nor should doing so conflict
with the radical feminist ideology which drives related laws, policies,
and regulations.
Regardless, many young men and their families have suffered
life-altering and pain-filled experiences when as college students the
young men became targets of false accusations. Witness the inexcusable
harm done to Duke University lacrosse players who had their lives
horrifically disrupted by vindictive false rape accusations and
vigilante justice.
Feminism picked the wrong target! + Who says romance is dead…
In short, I quickly realized that feminists didn’t quite live in reality. I also got the impression that instead of attempting to understand the big picture they were too focused on particulars. If needed, they would just come up with ad hoc explanations that have an air of the desperate, at least if you’re versed in “tools of oppression” like mathematics or logic.
Misandry: Timeline of gynocentric culture
By That we live in a gynocentric (woman-centered, woman-elevating)
culture is not rationally disputable to anyone who looks around with
open eyes. Many thinkers believe this elevation of women–and the
intensification of misandry that so frequently results from it–is
genetic and inescapable. Male disposability, rather than being a nominal
reality that is little more than an escape hatch for extreme
emergencies, is said to be central to the species. Protection and
provision of women first and foremost and putting men’s interests dead
last is supposedly just a built into our core natures and is thus
inescapable and inevitable, with only a tiny handful of people able to
see this for what it is: marginalization of and contempt for the vast
majority of men, especially men who stumble and fail in their “duty” to
destroy themselves for women. But for some time now, Peter Wright–a Man
Going His Own Way for many many years now–has been doing tireless work
exposing how foolish this genetic fatalism is, and how the gynocentrism
that pervades our popular culture today has a distinctly traceable
origin going to about the 11th Century in Europe, spreading from there
to other societies through literature, art, music and, eventually,
Hollywood movies, influencing other cultures throughout the world.Conflicts of Interest: Brussels' Revolving Door for Top EU Officials
Senior
European Commission officials have a penchant for changing sides when
they join the private sector. They take up positions with Chinese
companies, cigarette manufacturers or PR firms and
conflicts of interest are often ignored.
By Christoph Schult and Christoph Pauly: When Karel De Gucht came into office, he suspected that he would be
inundated with lobbyists. "It's a fact of life that there are a lot of
lobbyists; it's because you are important that there are a lot of
lobbies," the European Union Trade Commissioner-elect said before the
European Parliament at the time. For that reason, the Belgian politician
noted, he would counter "third-party interests where these have undue
influence," adding that he intended to defend his "independence."At the moment, Chinese companies are paying especially close attention to De Gucht. His decision to impose punitive tariffs on Chinese solar-panel manufacturers in a dispute over price dumping has made it clear to the Chinese that De Gucht meant what he said about his independence. He has been viewed as an enemy in China since then. A Chinese newspaper described him as "stubborn."
US DEBT CRISIS: forget the ceiling, take a look at the foundations. Then you will realise…
…the US debt problem is insoluble
“Don’t just stand there, raise the fuckin’ ceiling”
The Slog: As regards the continuing US deficit, there isn’t a crisis, there
never was a crisis, and there isn’t going to to be a crisis about any US
deficit, ever. It’s under 4% of GDP and falling.
America may have reached its debt ‘ceiling’ of $16.7 trillion (that’s
16,700,000,000,000 in zeros) but there are going to be talks and the
ceiling will be raised. There is no debt crisis because there is no debt
ceiling….it will just keep going up and up, because there is no way the
GOP Business Party is more powerful than the banks and Wall Street, and
no way anyone wants the American Dream to end.
What there is, however, is a debt problem. A problem is bigger than a
crisis where you can solve the crisis, but there is no solution to the
debt problem. As and when the cost of borrowing goes up – which (as I’ve
been saying since last February) it must – then the debt will beyond
management for even the Americans.
Consider: if average bond yields got up to 5% (10 yr T-bonds rose to
2.66% yesterday) then immediately 1 in every 6 US tax dollars would go
on debt management. Not repayment, just managing it at $16.7
trillion. And that’s before a single weapon is made, hospital injection
given, or Federal employee paid. Historically, such a yield would not be
at all unusual.
Last year, debt management was 6% of all Washington expenditure. This
year it is going to be 10%.