Telling the truth has become a revolutionary act, so let us salute those who disclose the necessary facts.
23 Jan 2014
Banksters: 100 Years Of The Federal Reserve
Moms Who Kidnap Kids: The back story
By Robert St. Estephe: Parental kidnapping, also known as parental child abduction, has a
long history. And it is a subject that has never been documented
historically. In the United States the phenomenon was by the 1850s so
widespread that in a news report on one such case, involving the
abduction of the children of a Mr. Ananias Thompson
by his wife which took place in northern California, the reporter noted
his reporting on one case “has all too many parallels in California.”
The most readily-available historical study that makes some effort to
offer the history of this phenomenon, Kidnapped: Child Abduction in America (Paula
S. Fass, Oxford University Press, 1997), is a poorly researched,
politically tendentious and unreliable source. One can quickly see how
its “social constructionist” attempt at offering an account of parental
kidnapping in the early 20th century is just by reading the first
article ever written, appearing in 1907, on the topic treating it as a
recognized social problem, titled “Love Proves Superior to Law’s Decrees.” The article was syndicated and appeared in numerous newspapers across the nation.
The quantity of material on parental kidnapping cases residing in old newspapers and that has gone untapped by scholars is of a scale that is truly monumental.
The quantity of material on parental kidnapping cases residing in old newspapers and that has gone untapped by scholars is of a scale that is truly monumental.
Autism And The US Vaccine Court Scam
Love From Occupied Palestine - A Dignified Call + Long Live Palestine
Five Rights Feminism Delivered For Women, But Doesn’t Want To Share With Men + Honey Badger Radio Alert: Erotica for me, Shame on thee
Two Powder Kegs Ready to Blow: China & India
China and India are both powder kegs awaiting a spark for the same reason:
systemic corruption.
By Charles Hugh Smith: The conventional view of China and India sports not one but two pair of rose-colored glasses: Chindia (even the portmanteau word is chirpy) is the world's engine of growth, and this rapid economic growth is chipping away at structural political and social problems.
By Charles Hugh Smith: The conventional view of China and India sports not one but two pair of rose-colored glasses: Chindia (even the portmanteau word is chirpy) is the world's engine of growth, and this rapid economic growth is chipping away at structural political and social problems.
Nice, especially from a distance. But on the ground, China and India (not Chindia--there
is no such entity) are both powder kegs awaiting a spark for the same reason: systemic corruption
in every nook and cranny of both nations. The conventional rose-colored
view is that corruption will inevitably decline with modernization and economic growth.
This is simply wrong on multiple levels: as the opportunities for crony/neofeudal skimming
increase, so does corruption. As the scale of the economy increases, so does the scale of
corruption.
China's "princelings" (offspring and family of the inner political circle and
top apparatchiks of the Communist Party) are billionaires, not mere millionaires.
A recent expose of offshore accounts held by various Chinese billionaires estimated
the wealth skimmed and transferred our of China at between $1 trillion and $4 trillion:
16 Year Old US Boy Gets SEXUALLY ASSAULTED By FEMALE POLICE OFFICER + @EverydaySexism UK/USA
HSBC Black Holes And Gov/Bank Fiddles - Max Keiser and Stacy Herbert with Payu Harris
The Ukrainian Government is Now Mass Texting Protestors with Warning Messages
By Michael Krieger: Earlier today, I highlighted the ingenious use of mirrors by Ukrainian protestors
to utilize non-violent, creative tactics to make powerful political
statements. With violence escalating in the past 24 hours, it appears
the Ukrainian government is now breaking out technological Big Brother
by sending mass text messages to protestors warning them that they are
being watched.
Remember: Your Government Loves You.
From CNET:
Your government wants to protect you. Because your government cares. Because your government works for you.
Except, that is, when you don’t like your government. That’s when your government works against you.
Take the Ukraine, which several people are trying to do just at the moment.
It’s decided to show what open government is really about. So it’s openly texting its citizens to tell them when they’ve been spotted protesting against the government.
Remember: Your Government Loves You.
From CNET:
Your government wants to protect you. Because your government cares. Because your government works for you.
Except, that is, when you don’t like your government. That’s when your government works against you.
Take the Ukraine, which several people are trying to do just at the moment.
It’s decided to show what open government is really about. So it’s openly texting its citizens to tell them when they’ve been spotted protesting against the government.
Man Who Donated Sperm To Lesbian Couple Forced To Pay Child Support
By Paul Elam: Shawnee
County District Court Judge Mary Mattivi has ruled that a Topeka,
Kansas man, William Marotta, who donated sperm to a lesbian couple after
responding to their online ad is the father of a child born to the
women and must pay child support.
Mattivi wrote that Marotta is more than a sperm donor and is financially responsible for the child because a licensed physician was not involved in the artificial insemination process. Marotta argued that he didn’t intend or desire to be a father. He signed a contract with the lesbian couple waiving all parental rights with the expectation that it exempted him from parental obligations.
The Kansas Department for Children and Families filed the case in October 2012 seeking to have the Topeka man declared the father of a girl born to Jennifer Schreiner in 2009. Their action was taken to recover $6,000.00 in public assistance and for future support of the child.
Mattivi wrote that Marotta is more than a sperm donor and is financially responsible for the child because a licensed physician was not involved in the artificial insemination process. Marotta argued that he didn’t intend or desire to be a father. He signed a contract with the lesbian couple waiving all parental rights with the expectation that it exempted him from parental obligations.
The Kansas Department for Children and Families filed the case in October 2012 seeking to have the Topeka man declared the father of a girl born to Jennifer Schreiner in 2009. Their action was taken to recover $6,000.00 in public assistance and for future support of the child.
Femopolis "Work A Day In His Boots" + Possibly the stupidest argument in the history of humankind
Instead of having a "walk a mile in her shoes" campaign, maybe we need a "work a day in his boots" campaign.
Mexican Citizens Topple Cartels And Are Rewarded With Government Retaliation
By Brandon Smith: There is one rule to citizen defiance that, in my opinion, surpasses
all others in strategic importance; and it is a rule that I have tried
to drive home for many years. I would call it the “non-participation
principle” and would summarize it as follows:
When facing a corrupt system, provide for yourself and
your community those necessities that the system cannot or will not.
Become independent from establishment-controlled paradigms. If you and
your community do this, the system will have one of two choices:
1) Admit that you do not need them anymore and fade into the fog of history, OR...
2) Reveal its tyrannical nature in full and attempt to force you back into dependence.
1) Admit that you do not need them anymore and fade into the fog of history, OR...
2) Reveal its tyrannical nature in full and attempt to force you back into dependence.