WD: Shocking how closely US F4J's experiences mirror the issues faced by us men and women of UK F4J and the boys and girls of the new UK Children4Justice
Telling the truth has become a revolutionary act, so let us salute those who disclose the necessary facts.
30 May 2014
Fathers4Justice v Kids4Cash: US F4J Member Hazart Sanker Speaks On Family Law Corruption
The Truth About Maya Angelou + The Truth About Martin Luther King, Jr.
Feminist Daisy Kler Lying to the Public
By Diana Davison and John Hembling: In February 2014 the government in British Columbia set aside $5.5 million dollars to address domestic violence problems. This money is in addition to $70 million that they invest every year. On May 5, 2014 Daisy Kler, of Vancouver Rape Relief, stated repeatedly on CBC’s BC Almanac radio show that there is “no political will” to stop domestic violence. That was the first of many lies.
“No political will,” in Daisy Kler’s world, means that $75.5 million dollars designated to prevent domestic violence is meaningless because they didn’t offer it directly to her. One point of annoyance in her CBC speech is that Daisy had to phone the ministry herself. That apparent lack of political will is further complicated by Daisy’s admission that an entire ministry exists, by name, to deal with domestic violence. She states “There is an office of domestic violence within the Ministry of Children and Families and Development. We have made contact with them today, that was on my initiative, not theirs.” Daisy is really annoyed they didn’t call her.
The government, with their lack of will, seems to have listened closely to feminist rhetoric and followed the advice of women’s groups who’ve recently been insisting that only men can stop violence against women. $1 million has been assigned to men’s programs. That’s the million that Daisy wants. And she has reasons.
“No political will,” in Daisy Kler’s world, means that $75.5 million dollars designated to prevent domestic violence is meaningless because they didn’t offer it directly to her. One point of annoyance in her CBC speech is that Daisy had to phone the ministry herself. That apparent lack of political will is further complicated by Daisy’s admission that an entire ministry exists, by name, to deal with domestic violence. She states “There is an office of domestic violence within the Ministry of Children and Families and Development. We have made contact with them today, that was on my initiative, not theirs.” Daisy is really annoyed they didn’t call her.
The government, with their lack of will, seems to have listened closely to feminist rhetoric and followed the advice of women’s groups who’ve recently been insisting that only men can stop violence against women. $1 million has been assigned to men’s programs. That’s the million that Daisy wants. And she has reasons.
Honey Badger Radio Elliot Roger, Is He Really The Face Of Men's Rights
Their names were:
Cheng Yuan “James” Hong, 20
George Chen, 19
Weihan “David” Wang, 20
Three young men with their entire lives ahead of them.
He then went on to shoot three others, one man and two women.
Elliot Rodgers, who considered other men to be merely disposable obstacles to attaining attention from women… Elliot Rodgers, who expressed enough visceral rage to slash three young men to death with a knife… Elliot Rodgers who fancied himself superior to all other men, called himself an “alpha male”… he is now the face of men’s rights in the main stream media.
Old Despotic Wine, New Feminist Bottles
“Whatever crushes individuality is despotism, by whatever name it may be called” - J. S. Mill
By Adam Kostakis: Lecture 6
Domination. So much of feminist analysis revolves around this
concept. A man who punches his wife is not just angry at her; he is
attempting to dominate her. A man who disagrees with a woman and talks over her is not just being rude; he is trying to dominate her. A rapist is not really that bothered about sex; his crime is a display of power, he just wanted to dominate the woman.You see, the fact that these things happen at all is not enough for the male-bashers of the world; they shall forever require more grist for the misandric mill. Punishing actual criminals is one thing, but it’s simply not gratifying enough to leave it there – they need to articulate what their womyn’s intuition has always told them, and go on the attack against all men. The problem, of course, is that the overwhelming majority of men don’t attack women in any perceptible way whatsoever. The solution, as feminists found, is to play Dr. Freud and posit some subconscious, underlying motivation – a dark, sexual, deviant, violent mentality, which acts as a universal explanation for male behavior.
No Common Ground – Men and Boy's Rights
Feminism and Facebook + MGTOW Hangout
Hey Look! The Deaths Of Men Don't Matter To Anyone . . . Again + Santa Barbara Staged Killing Event - Letter From Canada
SpinCycleSubmission: Our men, and two women murdered by Elliot Rodgers while men are murdered at 3 1/2 times the rate of women, yet we should stop violence against women, and not people.
Meet Directive 3025.18 Granting Obama The Baby Bomber Authority To Use Military Force Against US Men, Women, Children, Babies, etc.
Submitted by Tyler Durden: While the "use of armed [unmanned aircraft systems] is not authorized," The Washington Times uncovering of a 2010 Pentagon directive on military support to civilian authorities details what critics say is a troubling policy that envisions the Obama administration’s potential use of military force against Americans. As one defense official proclaimed, "this appears to be the latest step in the administration’s decision to use force within the United States against its citizens." Meet Directive 3025.18 and all its "quelling civil disturbances" totalitarianism...
As The Washington Times reports,
Directive No. 3025.18, “Defense Support of Civil Authorities,” was issued Dec. 29, 2010, and states that U.S. commanders “are provided emergency authority under this directive.”
“Federal military forces shall not be used to quell civil disturbances unless specifically authorized by the president in accordance with applicable law or permitted under emergency authority,” the directive states.