Telling the truth has become a revolutionary act, so let us salute those who disclose the necessary facts.
16 May 2015
Most Prestigious Legal Body In America Is Considering Changing Model Penal Code To Criminalize Holding Your Girlfriend’s Hand On A Date
By Pierce Harlan: The
American Law Institute is the most important and most prestigious
organization of legal scholars and prominent attorneys in the United
States. The ALI drafts model laws that become statutes and Restatements
of the Law that are widely cited as authority in judicial opinions.
Next week, the ALI is considering a proposed revision to the sexual assault provisions of the Model Penal Code that represents both a grotesque expansion of criminal law and an attempt to transform gender relations by punishing male conduct that has long been socially acceptable.
A group of very prominent legal scholars who have no political agenda are fighting back. They’ve written a stinging memorandum exposing the injustices in the proposed revision, That memorandum is set forth at the end of my post. I don’t have the intellectual firepower to add anything to it, but a few items that jumped out:
The proposed revision to the Model Penal Code would turn a young man on a date into a criminal if he timidly reaches out to hold his date’s hand without her prior positive agreement.
Next week, the ALI is considering a proposed revision to the sexual assault provisions of the Model Penal Code that represents both a grotesque expansion of criminal law and an attempt to transform gender relations by punishing male conduct that has long been socially acceptable.
A group of very prominent legal scholars who have no political agenda are fighting back. They’ve written a stinging memorandum exposing the injustices in the proposed revision, That memorandum is set forth at the end of my post. I don’t have the intellectual firepower to add anything to it, but a few items that jumped out:
The proposed revision to the Model Penal Code would turn a young man on a date into a criminal if he timidly reaches out to hold his date’s hand without her prior positive agreement.
The Female Peacock - MGTOW
Russia Tips The Grand Chess Board
26 Most Terrifying Words
Greece Will Default On June 5 Without Deal, IMF Leaks
Submitted by Tyler Durden: Another week came and went with no
breakthrough in negotiations between Greece and its debt-mongers. The IMF
is now fed up and has reportedly refused to be a part of any new bailout
program for Greece, after Athens drew down its SDR reserves
to makes its latest payment to the Fund. That money will now need to be
repaid and in a move that surely marks the new gold standard for absurd
circular funding schemes, Greece will likely look to use the next
tranche of IMF money to payback its IMF SDR reserve which it tapped to
pay the IMF. The country’s public sector employees live in limbo, not
knowing from one week to the next whether they will be paid and
commuters are now subjected
to a 50 second looped highlight reel of the Nazi occupation meant to
rally the country behind the government’s quarter trillion euro war
reparations claim (they might as well just ask for a 'gagillion') on
Germany which has now become the symbol of tyranny and debt servitude
for many Greek citizens.
Given the situation, one would be inclined to think that Alexis
Tsipras would be falling all over himself to cut a deal with creditors
because while giving up on campaign promises to voters isn’t ideal, it’s
better than going down in history as the PM who sent the country
careening into a drachma death spiral, and besides, giving up on
campaign promises is something most politicians do all the time (it’s a
job requirement for the US presidency). Alas we were back to the now
ubiquitous ‘red line’ rhetoric on Friday as Tsipras continued to employ
the “tell EU officials one thing behind close doors and tell the public
the exact opposite a day later” negotiating technique.Fixing How Some MGTOWs Get The MHRM Wrong (Part One)
By Paul Elam: I recently received an email that was sent to both AVFM and to a
prominent MGTOW online forum, regarding the assumed differences between
MHRAs and MGTOW. In it, several questions were posed. The way the
questions were framed indicated to me that the sender did not have a
real horse in the race. His wording was for all appearances unbiased and
his attitude genuinely in search of honest answers. He got cordial,
fairly detailed responses from both parties.
There was more than one question, all of them cogent and deserving of answers. I will take one at time, answering them all in a series of pieces, hopefully returning the thoughtfulness of his query with commensurate effort on my part to answer in kind.
I do not have permission to reveal this individuals name, or copy verbatim the contents of his email, but I do state this with an open invitation to the writer to come to these comments and point out if I make any mistakes that might mislead readers.
I also note that the answer you see from me here is not verbatim what I sent back in the email. It is an edited and expanded response (for the sake of publication) of what I sent back to the writer, but it does not stray at all from the general intent of what I had to say. Again, the person who contacted me is welcome to appear here to either validate or contradict that as he sees fit.
There was more than one question, all of them cogent and deserving of answers. I will take one at time, answering them all in a series of pieces, hopefully returning the thoughtfulness of his query with commensurate effort on my part to answer in kind.
I do not have permission to reveal this individuals name, or copy verbatim the contents of his email, but I do state this with an open invitation to the writer to come to these comments and point out if I make any mistakes that might mislead readers.
I also note that the answer you see from me here is not verbatim what I sent back in the email. It is an edited and expanded response (for the sake of publication) of what I sent back to the writer, but it does not stray at all from the general intent of what I had to say. Again, the person who contacted me is welcome to appear here to either validate or contradict that as he sees fit.
The Film Festival That Didn’t Make It To The Lame-Stream Media - Gaza
The film festival was a 3-day event (May 12-14, 2015) and focused
mainly on human rights, understandably, but shouldn’t be seen as any
less important than the counterpart in Cannes for example. Especially
when the stage of the events in Gaza is being considered.
The video of which I uploaded a copy due to its historical value, depicts a surrealistic setting of how and where the Gaza film festival was hosted. Surrounded by the completely destroyed neighborhood in Sheja’eya, rubble and debris – resulting from Israel’s crimes against humanity
The video of which I uploaded a copy due to its historical value, depicts a surrealistic setting of how and where the Gaza film festival was hosted. Surrounded by the completely destroyed neighborhood in Sheja’eya, rubble and debris – resulting from Israel’s crimes against humanity
The New Postmodern Illness
PC BS Misandry: Female UK Conservative MPs 2.35 Times More Likely To Be Given Cabinet Posts Than Their Male Colleagues
By Mike Buchanan: 47 of the current 331 Conservative MPs (14.2%) are women. Dave has
just given a third of cabinet positions to women, thereby meeting his
longstanding target – which only begs the obvious question:
If these women have been appointed on merit, why was there a need for a target?
Where next? A gender-balanced cabinet, as introduced by President Francois Hollande in France? That’s been a roaring success…
A female Conservative MP is 2.35 times more likely than her male colleagues to be given a cabinet position, on the grounds of gender alone. Gender equality is a fine thing. There must be numerous male Conservative MPs denied a cabinet position solely on the grounds of their gender. Not one has said a word about the matter.
If these women have been appointed on merit, why was there a need for a target?
Where next? A gender-balanced cabinet, as introduced by President Francois Hollande in France? That’s been a roaring success…
A female Conservative MP is 2.35 times more likely than her male colleagues to be given a cabinet position, on the grounds of gender alone. Gender equality is a fine thing. There must be numerous male Conservative MPs denied a cabinet position solely on the grounds of their gender. Not one has said a word about the matter.