It’s high time students refused to attend these patronising UK lectures.
Yes, these workshops are as ridiculous as they sound.
23 Oct 2015
At Last, Rebellion Against Misandric Sexual-Consent Classes
Yes, these workshops are as ridiculous as they sound.
Trump's Got Plans For America 'Jewish Plans!'
Feminists Protest Against Equality - Again
By Feminists in Florida have stopped throwing dictionaries around long enough to notice a nefarious bill in front of Florida’s Governor, Rick Scott, in which Senator Tom Lee has put forward the outrageous notion that women are capable adults, and that children are entitled to relationships with both parents following marital breakdown.
Here are some pertinent details of Bill SB 250: judges have to ‘make specific, written findings of fact regarding the relevant factors that justify an award of alimony’. In practical terms, this means that judges can’t award alimony punitively, or based on any statutory provisions, but instead have to make reference to the specific facts that justify why a man (or woman) must continue to support a person to whom they are no longer married.
Feminists claim that ‘[t]his bill, like its predecessors, will economically devastate women in traditional marriages who are divorced’, except that, oops, no it won’t. Those are precisely the women the bill protects. If you are a 65 year old woman in Florida who married straight out of high school and spent most of your adult life raising a family and caring for a home while your husband provided for you, you will be protected under SB 250, which is absolutely fair, IMO. The social contract was considerably different 40 years ago, and it’s very unfair to hold women who married without any market skills to modern standards.
Here are some pertinent details of Bill SB 250: judges have to ‘make specific, written findings of fact regarding the relevant factors that justify an award of alimony’. In practical terms, this means that judges can’t award alimony punitively, or based on any statutory provisions, but instead have to make reference to the specific facts that justify why a man (or woman) must continue to support a person to whom they are no longer married.Feminists claim that ‘[t]his bill, like its predecessors, will economically devastate women in traditional marriages who are divorced’, except that, oops, no it won’t. Those are precisely the women the bill protects. If you are a 65 year old woman in Florida who married straight out of high school and spent most of your adult life raising a family and caring for a home while your husband provided for you, you will be protected under SB 250, which is absolutely fair, IMO. The social contract was considerably different 40 years ago, and it’s very unfair to hold women who married without any market skills to modern standards.
Bullied To Death: Chris Mackney’s Kafka-Esque Divorce Chapter 5 Preview
Virginia statute on parental rights
The Restraining Order
The divorce officially started in May 2008; before that the jockeying began. Chris hired Sean Kelly as his divorce attorney while Dina hired Mark Carlin of Ain & Bank, considered one of the premiere divorce firms in the area.
Using the old adage “possession is nine tenth of the law” Dina pressured Chris into leaving their family home thereby possessing two key items: home and kids.
In April 2008, Carlin sent Chris a letter demanding child support, alimony, half his retirement, and that he leave the home. Here’s part of the letter.
Empire Of Debt
The Man-Shaming Project
Putin Just Warned Global War Is Increasingly More Likely: Here's Why
What began with a land grab in Crimea and escalated with support for the separatists at Donetsk, culminated in Moscow’s dramatic entry into Syria’s protracted civil war.
To be sure, the deplorable (not to mention comically absurd) strategy adopted by the US and its regional allies in Syria set Putin up for success. The situation was highly exploitable by anyone that’s strategically minded and thanks to the convoluted set of alliances Washington has built with groups that later turned out to be extremists, Moscow gets to achieve its regional ambitions while simultaneously fighting terrorism.
Netanyahu Blames Mufti Of Jerusalem, Not Hitler, For Final Solution. Is He Guilty Of “Holocaust Denial?”
Commentary by David Duke: In his effort to demonize the
Palestinians, Israeli PM 'Baby Butcher of Gaza' Netanyahu has contended that it was the Grand
Mufti of Jerusalem who suggested to Hitler to “burn the Jews.” In his
comments to the World Jewish Congress he said that,
“Hitler didn’t want to
exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jews,”
Netanyahu said in the speech. “And Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler
and said, ‘If you expel them, they’ll all come here. “‘So what should I do with them?'” Netanyahu said Hitler asked the mufti, who responded: “Burn them.”
This of course contradicts the Jewish contention that Hitler and
the Nazis planned the extermination of the Jews from the moment they
took power. Does this make Netanyahu a Hitler apologist? Should he be
prosecuted in Europe under Holocaust denial laws?
This comes on the heels of a recent controversy over an American Jewish professor’s contention that the Poles killed more Jews than the Germans.
“Hitler didn’t want to
exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jews,”
Netanyahu said in the speech. “And Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler
and said, ‘If you expel them, they’ll all come here. “‘So what should I do with them?'” Netanyahu said Hitler asked the mufti, who responded: “Burn them.”This comes on the heels of a recent controversy over an American Jewish professor’s contention that the Poles killed more Jews than the Germans.
Karma: Laughing Witch's Attempt To Fire @thunderf00t Backfires Spectacularly
Feminism And The Politics Of Fear
There are three conditions under which fear based appeals work:
- The appeal included a one-time behavioural change
- The target audience contained a large number of women
- The appeal describes how to avoid the threat