Telling the truth has become a revolutionary act, so let us salute those who disclose the necessary facts.
2 Jan 2016
Farrakhan: Donald Trump Will Take America Into The Abyss Of Hell!
The Voice Of God-Jewish Religions And The Prospect Of Dissent
"The Jewish religion is a religion of Mitzvoth (commandments) and without this religious idiom, the Jewish religion doesn’t exist at all." Professor Yeshayahu Leibowitz. In reality, the first Jews invented a God who chose them over all other people. For some reason this God is occasionally cruel, often non-ethical and as if this were not enough, not exactly a nice father. The Jewish God doesn’t even allow his people to call him by name. One may wonder what led the first Jews to invent such a horrid father figure. One may further question what led the Jews to sustain their ‘relationship’ with such an obnoxious father. The answer is surprisingly simple. They don’t.
Feminists’ Manipulation Of Wikipedia Content
By Mike Buchanan: I’m a big fan of Wiki, and barely a day goes by during which I don’t consult the site on some matter. But when it comes to gender political matters, the site is highly inaccurate, due to the dire influence of feminist editors. My thanks to T for pointing me to a piece in which feminists describe and gloat about their manipulations of the site. It’s titled, ‘Chipping away at Wikipedia’s gender bias, one article at a time’.
Many Wiki pieces – including those on subjects without an obvious gender political angle, to normal people (i.e. non-feminists and anti-feminists) – have content starting with things like, ‘Feminist scholars say that…’, rather than the altogether more accurate, ‘Taxpayer-funded men-hating lying women say that…’.
Many Wiki pieces – including those on subjects without an obvious gender political angle, to normal people (i.e. non-feminists and anti-feminists) – have content starting with things like, ‘Feminist scholars say that…’, rather than the altogether more accurate, ‘Taxpayer-funded men-hating lying women say that…’.
Ukrainians Loathe The Kiev Government Imposed By Obama
By Eric Zuesse: On December 23rd, Gallup headlines “Ukrainians Disillusioned With Leadership,” and reports that “nearly nine in 10 Ukrainians (88%) say corruption is widespread in their government, and about eight in 10 (81%) see the same widespread problem in their country’s businesses.” 8% of Ukrainians now say they “have confidence … about the national government.” 17% approve of the job-performance of their President, Petro Poroshenko. While the pre-coup President, Viktor Yanukovych, was in office, 2010-2014, that figure had been averaging about 23%, and was never as low as Poroshenko’s is now.
Gallup reports, “fewer Ukrainians now say their leadership is taking them in the right direction than before the revolution,” but that statement calling this coup a ‘revolution’ embodies the propaganda-lie of one of Gallup’s main clients, the U.S. government itself, which calls the U.S. coup in Ukraine in February 2014 a “revolution,” when every honest and knowledgeable person now knows that this U.S. government claim — that it had helped install democracy instead of having ended it in Ukraine on 20 February 2014 — to have been a lie. Even the founder of the “private CIA” firm Stratfor has called the overthrow of Yanukovych “the most blatant coup in history.”
Gallup reports, “fewer Ukrainians now say their leadership is taking them in the right direction than before the revolution,” but that statement calling this coup a ‘revolution’ embodies the propaganda-lie of one of Gallup’s main clients, the U.S. government itself, which calls the U.S. coup in Ukraine in February 2014 a “revolution,” when every honest and knowledgeable person now knows that this U.S. government claim — that it had helped install democracy instead of having ended it in Ukraine on 20 February 2014 — to have been a lie. Even the founder of the “private CIA” firm Stratfor has called the overthrow of Yanukovych “the most blatant coup in history.”
On Feminism And Labels
5 Ways Rey Kicks Feminists In The Face
By Janet Bloomfield (aka JudgyBitch):According to the Wookieepedia, Rey is a ‘force sensitive human female scavenger’ who conducts her trade on the planet of Jakku, located in a remote section of the Western Reaches, thirty years after the Battle of Endor. These factoids are all relevant to who Rey is, as a person, but since feminists have a hard time seeing individuals as humans (and are embarrassingly ignorant about science fiction worlds in general), Rey was immediately proclaimed a feminist heroine because she has a vagina and does manly stuff, like pilot ships, fix them when they break and speak more than one language.
Naturally, it didn’t take long before feminists started in-fighting over Rey, with enthusiasts declaring her freaking amazing, and detractors muttering over her “Mary Sue” status. I’m particularly amused by Casey Cipriani, writing at Bustle, who writes “[t]he very existence of Rey was a bright spot in the often dark pit of female representation in science fiction, particularly in Hollywood blockbusters.”
Really, Casey? Didn’t feminists just wrap up caterwauling over Charlize Theron in Mad Max: Fury Road? Are your memories really that short? And what rock do you need to live under to have missed that whole Terminator and Alien blockbuster franchise thingy?
Naturally, it didn’t take long before feminists started in-fighting over Rey, with enthusiasts declaring her freaking amazing, and detractors muttering over her “Mary Sue” status. I’m particularly amused by Casey Cipriani, writing at Bustle, who writes “[t]he very existence of Rey was a bright spot in the often dark pit of female representation in science fiction, particularly in Hollywood blockbusters.”
Really, Casey? Didn’t feminists just wrap up caterwauling over Charlize Theron in Mad Max: Fury Road? Are your memories really that short? And what rock do you need to live under to have missed that whole Terminator and Alien blockbuster franchise thingy?