“Our Western Values” No Longer Exist

'How can it be that tranny toilet facilities are more important than the West’s ongoing gratuitous
destruction of Muslim countries?'

By Paul Craig Roberts: Let’s be honest. The US attack on Mosul, Iraq, is not an attack on ISIS. It it a repeat of Israel’s operation Cast Lead in Gaza. The purpose is to kill as many Muslims for Israel as possible. Here is the evidence:
http://news.antiwar.com/2017/03/23/reports-us-airstrikes-killed-230-civilians-in-mosul-overnight/
http://news.antiwar.com/2017/03/23/child-victims-of-mosul-overwhelm-emergency-hospital/
http://news.antiwar.com/2017/03/23/un-warns-worst-is-yet-to-come-with-400000-civilians-trapped-in-western-mosul/
Remember, the reason ISIS is in Iraq and Syria is that the US equipped ISIS and sent ISIS to overthrow Assad when the British Parliament and the Russian government blocked Obama’s planned invasion of Syria. ISIS is Washington’s creation, just as is Al Qaeda.
After 16 years and trillions of dollars, the Afghan Taliban still holds sway over “the world’s only superpower”

Blowback In London

'The fact that Britain is still at war after 15 years surely means that some serious rethinking is required about foreign policy.'

By Paul Rogers: This week’s attack was the worst in London for 12 years and has caused shock and horror, especially for the way in which a vehicle was so easily and violently used to killed innocent pedestrians. We will know in the coming days the extent to which this was an individual attack or whether it involved others and, if the latter, why there was apparently no warning.

The immediate reaction is to think of the families and friends of the victims and that is right and proper, but in due course we have to look at why there is still this threat. Britain has now been involved in the “war on terror” for over 15 years, yet the sense of fear and concern over the risk of attacks is as high as it has even been. Why is this so?

One core issue makes for difficult reading and it concerns the “disconnect” in Britain between the terrible event this week and the continuing war in Iraq.

More Calls For The Internet Kill Switch And Suspending The First Amendment

Lionel Nation: “Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us." Said Justice William O. Douglas. It appears that various guides guides to mounting a car terror attack were available on Google and Twitter and this is inspiring calls to shut the Internet down or dust off the prototype kill switch. Holy overkill, Batman!

History Needs David Irvings

Introduction by Gilad Atzmon: I learn from the Times of Israel that the LSE (London chool of Economics) is “investigating anti-Semitic comments at (Professor Richard) Falk’s event”.  The LSE will look into “alleged hate speech at an event they hosted on Monday night, when audience member Gilad Atzmon, told students to read the works of notorious Holocaust denier David Irving.”
I look forward to hearing from the LSE ‘investigating team’,  just so I can remind them that recommending human beings to read books is actually what universities are for.
But I will also mention to the LSE investigatory unit, that my views of Irving’s importance are actually identical to those of one of LSE best historians , Professor Donald Cameron Watt who, in 2000, claimed that “History needs David Irvings” and “The truth needs Irving's challenges to keep it alive.”
Sooner or later, the LSE will have to decide whether it is an Athenian institute subscribing to Logos and free intellectual exchange, or whether it prefers to engage in Jerusalemite book-burning. It will have to choose whether it endorses Karl Popper’s vision of the ‘Open Society’ or whether it prefers  to switch sides and become simply the ‘Enemy’  

What follows is Professor D.C. Watt’s article, as published by the London Evening Standard,  April 11, 2000

Eleanor Of Aquitaine And Her ‘Courts Of Love’

By Peter Wright: The following is a fascinating look at the medieval assizes established to adjudicate in love disputes. The ‘Court of Love’ is the historical forerunner to all later models of state interference in private affairs, as we see in today’s family courts and also at university honour courts set up to adjudicate sexual relations between students. The following account by professor Amy Kelly explains how this longstanding Western tradition first began.

___________________

BY Amy Kelly (1937)^1: ANDREAS CAPELLANUS furnishes in his Tractatus² the principal source of our notions, which are scanty enough, of the institution known as the ‘courts of love’ in the twelfth century.
In his work we come as near as possible to the original character of the courts before their ideas and practices became a stereotyped element in the chivalric convention, a part of a shaping influence in the social customs and the literary traditions of the Renaissance. The Tractatus (published 1190 AD) is based closely in theme and substance on Ovid’s Ars Amatoria (published 1 BC). In both works the conception of love is that of illicit passion; but there is a significant difference.

The Amazon Book Burning

"Whatever offends the Jews, that dies. Jews got this first batch of books banned not because they could be factually incorrect, but because Jews have real trouble with facts, historical and forensic facts like those presented in these books that expose the holocaust as a hoax." Said ex-Jew Nathanael.

Amazon Alexa - The Feminist Ghost In The Machine

By Andy Thomas (aka "Andy Man"): I’ve just received delivery of an Amazon Echo. If you’ve been living in the wilderness for the last year or so and don’t know what this is, Echo is Amazon’s equivalent to a Google Home device – a talking AI assistant that really works (by default, you address the Echo device as “Alexa”).
For me, this is the science fiction of my childhood come true!
Unfortunately, every silver lining has a cloud and Alexa comes with a distinctly dystopian one…

Alexa, are you a feminist?
Yes, I am a feminist, as is anyone who believes in bridging the inequality between men and women in society.

Misandric Jewish Dominion

"You kill all their [every non-Jewish male in the world] males, by sword. You leave the women."

Zionist Report: Nohide Laws are nothing more than 'men's law' and it is what Christ harshly condemned. The Jews do not follow the Torah but the Talmud.

McCain World Order - William Banzai7

MGM: Claimed Medical Benefits - Part 1

By William Collins aka MRA-UK: This post is the first of a series which will address the claim that circumcision is beneficial in reducing the likelihood of certain diseases. This first part introduces my motivation for revisiting this issue, namely a recent publication by Brian Morris and co-authors. After making some general observations about this journal paper, and setting it in the context of world opinion, I present a specific critique of the claims regarding the impact of circumcision (male genital mutilation, MGM) on urinary tract infections. Providing I have the stamina, Part 2 will critique the claims for other diseases. Part 3 will examine the quantifiable risks or disbenefits of circumcision, and hence the overall position on risk-benefit. In addition, Part 3 will present my rebuttals of some appallingly biased counter-arguments to intactivism.
These posts refer to circumcisions carried out by medical practitioners in clean surgical conditions. Some data on traditional Jewish brit milah is included, but this is not the focus of interest. Most importantly, ritual circumcisions of the type which are common in many African countries are not addressed. These latter practices are so brutal, and result so frequently in maimings or death, that any question of the benefit outweighing the risk does not arise at all.