Companies partner to forward ‘commercial-scale integration’ of intention scanning technology
By Madison Ruppert: Suspect Detection Systems, the company behind Cogito intention scanning technology, also known as malicious intent (or malintent) detection technology,
announced on Dec. 18 that they would be partnering with SDB Partners, a
Washington, D.C.-based company, in order to market and distribute their
products to U.S. law enforcement agencies.
This same type of technology is also marketed as “threat assessment” technology
which, supposedly, analyzes individuals for behaviors which indicate
potential terrorist activity or intent to commit some kind of criminal
act.
However, as I have shown in the past, just about everything imaginable can be considered an indicator of potential terrorist activity including most bodily movements.
Thus, when systems are programmed according to the indicators provided by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) among others like state law enforcement and the military, most people could be flagged by the systems.
Yet the companies behind such technology continue to pretend that it
is some kind of incredibly accurate practice through clever marketing
practices and unsubstantiated claims.
The technology is nothing new, although most likely are completely
unaware of its existence. Indeed, the technology has even been covered
by mainstream broadcast news networks, although in a characteristically
uncritical manner:
Interestingly, as the above clip reveals, the system has been tested
in Israel and was developed in part by a former Mossad agent.
In the case of Cogito, they claim it “utilizes two sophisticated
layers to detect a potential terror or criminal suspect at a point of
entry, such as an airport, transportation terminal or border crossing,”
according to Government Security News Magazine.
“First, potential suspects are rapidly identified among a crowd using
a remote ‘intention scanning’ technology,” the article, which is likely
just a press release, continues. “Suspects flagged by remote
identification are then questioned by an automated interrogation system
that can accurately identify whether the suspect intends to commit an
act of crime or terror, or has ties to a criminal organization.”
Such “automated interrogation” systems are already being tested at border crossings in the United States.
The automated interrogation is then followed up by additional law enforcement action.
According to the Government Security News Magazine article, it is not
just law enforcement agencies utilizing this technology to supposedly
detect intent to commit a crime or to “determine a suspect’s association
to a particular criminal action or organization.”
“Private sector security companies similarly utilize Cogito to detect
intent to harm an employer’s interests, among employees, management or
job applicants,” the article states.
“Suspect Detection Systems products bridge a gap because they
discover the intent of a person or persons,” said Stephen Bryen, CEO of
SDB Partners.
However, such methods are inconsistent at best and misleading at
worst. The fact that biometric indicators vary widely from person to
person is far too often ignored by proponents of such technology.
“Until now, screeners either had to find something incriminating, or
have advanced knowledge through intelligence gathering of a potential
threat,” said Bryen, pointing out that probable cause could increasingly
be eliminated from the equation thanks to technology like Cogito.
“While screeners at airports and border crossings can ask questions
of suspects they face two problems: they are guessing whether they
really have a genuine suspect, often guessing wrongly; and accurately
judging suspect responses is very difficult if not impossible. That is
where Suspect Detection Systems has invented a hugely important gap filler,” claimed Bryen.
“We believe there are many applications for Cogito Technology and
look forward to distributing this easy-to-implement, multi-layered
security system in the United States,” said Bryen.
“Suspect Detection Systems has identified a partner with the
experience and know-how to market and distribute proven security
technologies in the United States, the nation that understands the role
of technology in advancing Homeland Security,” said CEO of Suspect
Detection Systems Gil Boosidan.
“We are confident that our alliance with SDB Partners has significant
potential to lead to the commercial-scale integration of Cogito
Technology in the United States — realizing a major goal of our
company,” added Boosidan.
How exactly will this technology be implemented and where? Will it be
relied on as heavily as the companies selling it would obviously like?
Is this technology acceptable and accurate? Can it hold up under legal
scrutiny?
All of these questions and more will have to be addressed as they
work towards the “commercial-scale integration” of Cogito and other
similar systems.
No comments:
Post a Comment