By Mike Buchanan: British men and boys have been increasingly insulted and
demonised over the past 50 years by angry vociferous women driven by
misandry (hatred of men). Men’s and boys’ interests have been ever more
assaulted by the actions and inactions of politicians seeking to placate
those women, particularly over the past 30 years, with no democratic mandate to do so.
Conservative and Labour governments have been equally bad in this
respect, and the current Conservative-led coalition is the worst of them
all, with David Cameron slavishly following policy directions set by
Harriet Harman and other gender feminist politicians over the past 30
years.
Men collectively pay 72% of the state’s income tax revenues, while
women collectively pay only 28% and receive disproportionately far more
from the state in return. Men pay a total of £64 billion more income tax annually than women, yet they’re increasingly ignored and disadvantaged by the state they largely finance.
We’re receiving support (and donations) not only from men, but also from women, who believe (as we do) in equality of opportunities for men and women rather than equality of outcomes, which require anti-meritocratic social engineering initiatives to deliver, cause considerable damage to the fabric of a civilised society, and result in justifiable resentment among men who are unfairly disadvantaged.
We’re receiving support from women who are mothers of boys, and see them increasingly disadvantaged by the education system.
We’re receiving support from women who love their male partners, fathers, brothers, male friends and acquaintances, and who deplore the assaults on those men’s interests.
One area we find women particularly angry about is the state’s continuing failure to ensure men are allowed reasonable access to their children, if and when their vindictive ex-partners deny them that access. Many women believe, as we do, that such denial of access is emotional abuse of men and children.
Our party will raise public consciousness about the many disadvantages and discriminations faced by men and boys in modern Britain, and campaign to have them reversed.
On 2 March 2013 I wrote to David Cameron outlining our reasons for establishing a political party, and announced our intention to contest the top 30 Conservative marginal seats at the 2015 general election:
130302 open letter to David Cameron
We’re currently engaged in a public consultation exercise, and I invite you to contribute feedback on the associated document (link below). Your feedback will help us develop our first election manifesto.
http://j4mb.wordpress.com/our-public-consultation-exercise-2/
Our prime areas of concern, as outlined in the consultation document, are:
1. Paternal access to children – following relationship breakdowns, the state ensures fathers meet their financial obligations towards their children, whilst not ensuring them reasonable access to the same children. We believe this to be emotional abuse of both fathers and their children.
2. Domestic abuse – there’s a great deal of evidence showing women are at least as aggressive as men in their intimate relationships, yet virtually all state support for victims of domestic abuse is directed towards female victims, not male victims.
3. Anti-male bias in legislation and official guidelines for civil
servants – these anti-male biases should be scrapped. No legislation or
official guidelines favour men over women.
4. Political representation – there’s a Minister for Women, but no Minister for Men. The government should repeal legislation which enables political parties to use women-only shortlists to select prospective parliamentary candidates.
5. Education – a highly feminised education system ensures 60% of university students are female.
6. Employment – almost two-thirds of public sector workers are women, yet the ‘public sector equality duty’ in the Equality Act (2010) allows public sector organisations to favour women over men, when recruiting.
7. Marriage and divorce – in an era when women have long enjoyed equal employment rights as men, it’s unfair that women continue to achieve personal enrichment through divorce.
8. Health – the state spends far more on health provision for women e.g. almost as many men die of prostate cancer as women die of breast cancer, yet the state spends only a third of the sum on early diagnosis of prostate cancer, as it spends on early diagnosis of breast cancer.
9. Justice system – when convicted of the same crime, men are far more likely than women to receive custodial sentences, and more severe sentences generally. 80,000 British men are in prison, and 4,000 women, yet the government’s focus is on reducing the number of women in prison.
10. Anonymity for people suspected of sexual assault – the coalition government committed to reinstating anonymity for people suspected of sexual assault (until and unless convicted) but reneged on the commitment once in office. Many innocent men’s lives continue to be ruined as a result.
11. The business sector – the government continues to bully companies (through its continuing threats of gender quotas) into increasing the proportion of women in their senior reaches – e.g. in the boardrooms of FTSE100 companies – despite being aware of the evidence that in doing so, they’re harming those companies’ future financial performance.
12. Homelessness – over 90% of homeless people are men.
13. Suicide – the suicide rate among men is 3x that among women.
14. Retirement age – on average men die earlier, yet retire later.
15. Abortion law reform – in 2012, in England and Wales, 185,122 abortions were carried out. 180,117 (97%) of them were carried out on the grounds of reducing the risk of injury to the physical or mental health of the women. Of these, 180,008 (99.94%) were carried out on risk to mental health grounds although there’s no evidence to support the thesis that abortion reduces the risk to women’s mental health.
We plan to contest the 30 most marginal Conservative seats at the May 2015 general election. I’ll personally be contesting the Bedford & Kempston seat, while Ray Barry - the leader of another political party, The Equal Parenting Alliance – will be contesting the Wolverhampton South-West seat for our party.
At the 2010 general election those 30 seats were won by Conservative candidates with majorities in the range of 54 – 1,692 votes. While we shall be fighting to win those seats, even a modest number of votes would be enough to unseat the sitting MPs, and could change the outcome of the election. This would put men’s human rights squarely on the political ‘radar’ in the UK for the first time. The parties would thereafter have no choice but to start taking men’s human rights more seriously, and start to reverse 30+ years of state-sponsored discriminations against men and boys.
The hostile, poisonous, undemocratic, anti-meritocratic, anti-male culture which has developed over 30+ years must be challenged and defeated for the sakes of men, women, and children. For the sake of Britain as a civilised society. The challenge will have to start at the ballot box, which is why we’ve launched a political party.
Click Source Link for more or to support
Angelo Agathangelou: Enjoyed an interesting conversation with Mike this evening. A well spoken and thoughtful man. We discussed the resurging and growing movement of mature intelectual second wave men's equal rights exemplified by Canada's AVfM and it's burgeoning international community.
The above statement from the Justice for Men and Boys (and The Women Who Love Them) party site clarifies his position with which I wholeheartedly concur. He has my support in what will make an interesting statement if nothing else and is likely to expose the well of misery created by the disgracefully misandric UK family kangaroo courts supported by our labour and conservative politicos and for time beyond memory.
A vote for the lame stream parties is a vote against yourself and for big interests. I saw this from the inside. Red, Blue, Yellow, we have all seen the evidence that as groups, they all amount to the status quo of politicians self interest and bankster interests. Any independent or worthy cause is by definition not a politician in the manner of the filthy skimmers we have today and would be a far more worth while vote in my opinion.
Reading Mike's manifesto any reasonable and sane person may ask, how are they getting away with this? The answer as ever, ...all that is required is for otherwise good people to say nothing and allow it.
There's a buzz of excitement in the equal rights for men and boys movement as we enter 2014. If we continue on this trajectory, this promises to be another eventful year.
Men collectively pay 72% of the state’s income tax revenues, while
women collectively pay only 28% and receive disproportionately far more
from the state in return. Men pay a total of £64 billion more income tax annually than women, yet they’re increasingly ignored and disadvantaged by the state they largely finance.We’re receiving support (and donations) not only from men, but also from women, who believe (as we do) in equality of opportunities for men and women rather than equality of outcomes, which require anti-meritocratic social engineering initiatives to deliver, cause considerable damage to the fabric of a civilised society, and result in justifiable resentment among men who are unfairly disadvantaged.
We’re receiving support from women who are mothers of boys, and see them increasingly disadvantaged by the education system.
We’re receiving support from women who love their male partners, fathers, brothers, male friends and acquaintances, and who deplore the assaults on those men’s interests.
One area we find women particularly angry about is the state’s continuing failure to ensure men are allowed reasonable access to their children, if and when their vindictive ex-partners deny them that access. Many women believe, as we do, that such denial of access is emotional abuse of men and children.
Our party will raise public consciousness about the many disadvantages and discriminations faced by men and boys in modern Britain, and campaign to have them reversed.
On 2 March 2013 I wrote to David Cameron outlining our reasons for establishing a political party, and announced our intention to contest the top 30 Conservative marginal seats at the 2015 general election:
130302 open letter to David Cameron
We’re currently engaged in a public consultation exercise, and I invite you to contribute feedback on the associated document (link below). Your feedback will help us develop our first election manifesto.
http://j4mb.wordpress.com/our-public-consultation-exercise-2/
Our prime areas of concern, as outlined in the consultation document, are:
1. Paternal access to children – following relationship breakdowns, the state ensures fathers meet their financial obligations towards their children, whilst not ensuring them reasonable access to the same children. We believe this to be emotional abuse of both fathers and their children.
2. Domestic abuse – there’s a great deal of evidence showing women are at least as aggressive as men in their intimate relationships, yet virtually all state support for victims of domestic abuse is directed towards female victims, not male victims.
3. Anti-male bias in legislation and official guidelines for civil
servants – these anti-male biases should be scrapped. No legislation or
official guidelines favour men over women.4. Political representation – there’s a Minister for Women, but no Minister for Men. The government should repeal legislation which enables political parties to use women-only shortlists to select prospective parliamentary candidates.
5. Education – a highly feminised education system ensures 60% of university students are female.
6. Employment – almost two-thirds of public sector workers are women, yet the ‘public sector equality duty’ in the Equality Act (2010) allows public sector organisations to favour women over men, when recruiting.
7. Marriage and divorce – in an era when women have long enjoyed equal employment rights as men, it’s unfair that women continue to achieve personal enrichment through divorce.
8. Health – the state spends far more on health provision for women e.g. almost as many men die of prostate cancer as women die of breast cancer, yet the state spends only a third of the sum on early diagnosis of prostate cancer, as it spends on early diagnosis of breast cancer.
9. Justice system – when convicted of the same crime, men are far more likely than women to receive custodial sentences, and more severe sentences generally. 80,000 British men are in prison, and 4,000 women, yet the government’s focus is on reducing the number of women in prison.
10. Anonymity for people suspected of sexual assault – the coalition government committed to reinstating anonymity for people suspected of sexual assault (until and unless convicted) but reneged on the commitment once in office. Many innocent men’s lives continue to be ruined as a result.
11. The business sector – the government continues to bully companies (through its continuing threats of gender quotas) into increasing the proportion of women in their senior reaches – e.g. in the boardrooms of FTSE100 companies – despite being aware of the evidence that in doing so, they’re harming those companies’ future financial performance.
12. Homelessness – over 90% of homeless people are men.
13. Suicide – the suicide rate among men is 3x that among women.
14. Retirement age – on average men die earlier, yet retire later.
15. Abortion law reform – in 2012, in England and Wales, 185,122 abortions were carried out. 180,117 (97%) of them were carried out on the grounds of reducing the risk of injury to the physical or mental health of the women. Of these, 180,008 (99.94%) were carried out on risk to mental health grounds although there’s no evidence to support the thesis that abortion reduces the risk to women’s mental health.
We plan to contest the 30 most marginal Conservative seats at the May 2015 general election. I’ll personally be contesting the Bedford & Kempston seat, while Ray Barry - the leader of another political party, The Equal Parenting Alliance – will be contesting the Wolverhampton South-West seat for our party.
At the 2010 general election those 30 seats were won by Conservative candidates with majorities in the range of 54 – 1,692 votes. While we shall be fighting to win those seats, even a modest number of votes would be enough to unseat the sitting MPs, and could change the outcome of the election. This would put men’s human rights squarely on the political ‘radar’ in the UK for the first time. The parties would thereafter have no choice but to start taking men’s human rights more seriously, and start to reverse 30+ years of state-sponsored discriminations against men and boys.
The hostile, poisonous, undemocratic, anti-meritocratic, anti-male culture which has developed over 30+ years must be challenged and defeated for the sakes of men, women, and children. For the sake of Britain as a civilised society. The challenge will have to start at the ballot box, which is why we’ve launched a political party.
Click Source Link for more or to support
____
Angelo Agathangelou: Enjoyed an interesting conversation with Mike this evening. A well spoken and thoughtful man. We discussed the resurging and growing movement of mature intelectual second wave men's equal rights exemplified by Canada's AVfM and it's burgeoning international community.The above statement from the Justice for Men and Boys (and The Women Who Love Them) party site clarifies his position with which I wholeheartedly concur. He has my support in what will make an interesting statement if nothing else and is likely to expose the well of misery created by the disgracefully misandric UK family kangaroo courts supported by our labour and conservative politicos and for time beyond memory.
A vote for the lame stream parties is a vote against yourself and for big interests. I saw this from the inside. Red, Blue, Yellow, we have all seen the evidence that as groups, they all amount to the status quo of politicians self interest and bankster interests. Any independent or worthy cause is by definition not a politician in the manner of the filthy skimmers we have today and would be a far more worth while vote in my opinion.
Reading Mike's manifesto any reasonable and sane person may ask, how are they getting away with this? The answer as ever, ...all that is required is for otherwise good people to say nothing and allow it.
There's a buzz of excitement in the equal rights for men and boys movement as we enter 2014. If we continue on this trajectory, this promises to be another eventful year.
No comments:
Post a Comment