By
Rosie Taylor
and
Tom Payne: The
barrister who accused a male solicitor of sexism after he described her
photograph on a business website as ‘stunning’ has previously told men
online they were ‘hot stuff’.
Charlotte
Proudman, 27, claimed Alexander Carter-Silk had ‘objectified her’ with
the message he sent on the networking site LinkedIn.
She
then posted his comments – and her outraged response – on Twitter,
telling the married 57-year-old that focusing on women’s looks ‘silences
women’s professional attributes as their physical appearance becomes
the subject’.
The row was triggered on Monday when Mr Carter-Silk responded to an approach from her to ‘connect’ on LinkedIn.
He
wrote: ‘I appreciate that this is probably horrendously politically
incorrect but that is a stunning picture!!! You definitely win the prize
for the best LinkedIn picture I have ever seen.’
She
responded: ‘Alex, I find your message offensive. I am on Linked-in
[sic] for business purposes, not to be approached about my physical
appearance or to be objectified by sexist men.’
He
emailed her an apology on Wednesday, but Miss Proudman said there was
‘no acknowledgement that the message he sent was inappropriate or is
sexist’.
Within hours, thousands of people were replying to her tweets, praising and ridiculing her for shaming Mr Carter-Silk.
However,
it emerged yesterday that the award-winning human rights barrister has
commented on pictures of men on Facebook herself to praise their looks.
She also told female friends they looked ‘sexy’ and ‘stunning’ – the same word used by Mr Carter-Silk.
On
the profile of a postgraduate student at Cambridge, where Miss Proudman
is on sabbatical from her chambers to study for a PhD, she wrote: ‘Hot
stuff!’, while under an image of a long-haired male friend, she wrote:
‘oooo lalala!’
Beneath
photos from women, she was also happy to compliment their looks, saying
to different friends: ‘Oh ladies, wowwweeeeee!!!!!!’, ‘wow!
stunning!!!!’ and ‘Sexy lady!’
Miss
Proudman said Mr Carter-Silk’s comments were particularly unacceptable
because he made them in a workplace environment in his capacity as a
senior solicitor.
No comments:
Post a Comment