By Roy: The more that I have pondered the generic behaviors of radical feminists, the more I have come to suspect that feminism is a personality disorder masquerading as a social movement.
This led me to wonder about actual clinical criteria for PBD's as defined by the professional psychiatric community.
One doesn't have to dig too deep to find repeated references to psychopathy, anti-social disorders, and sociopathology.
Do these clinical descriptions have any relevant relationship to feminism today?
Source
Angelo: Good observation. It's technically illegal for me to say this thanks to the rules of the secret UK kangaroo so-called family courts, so naturally I will in spite that Orwellian folly.
...Around eight years ago I made a similar observation to the judge who gave off an air that was a cross between the judge in the David Bowie film 'Merry Christmas Mr Lawrence and Black Adder's General Melched, "I'll have you shot for being rude to a lady" regarding my ex who was actively trying to get me imprisoned on a myriad of spurious charges, none of which stuck, but did muddy the waters plenty to her advantage.
My point was that completely flummoxed by my ex's behaviour, bearing in mind that we had children, that she was unscrupulously willing to use and abuse, ...I had discovered a list of ten behaviours that defined malignant narcissism and so I made the judge aware of this discovery and how it precisely mirrored the behaviour of the uncooperative party seeking sole custody.
She absolutely went from a person that I knew to be egalitarian and warm to a sociopath. I wouldn't have staid for six years or a New York Minute, being a natural born give no and take no shit egalitarian or MGTOW and I definitely would not have had children with the cold, calculating entitled radical feminist and the rest, malignant narcissist she had clearly hidden well.
To illustrate the dangers here, ...this is a woman who at one time had sat with me and a friend who was suffering due to the struggle to see his children and at that point she had shown great sympathy and stated clearly that she would never do such a thing, something I took as a good sign, but in hindsight that was a trap.
That’s the problem with sociopaths; they are very difficult to spot. I've fluked 156 IQ this year and missed it, ...if you see a flash of the lunatic, it's not period issues, it's a fucking lunatic, so get out immediately!
So it is with feminism, after all it took us long enough to speak up. I only went marching with F4J in 2002 because I was staring into an abyss of fear for my children, because malignant feminism came to my house and knocked down the door to take my kids and give them to a stone cold calculated perjurer with 0 remorse who spent the subsequent years convincing our/her kids that I had abandoned them, even as I was marching with 299 other father Christmas’s to stop my children losing their father for what the stats were saying was highly likely to be forever. Coo coo!
That's the issue with feminism right there; it's excellent cover for malignant narcissism.
As for a fair and actually just court, ...they would have treated the entire affair completely differently, for starters they would have treated me as well as they treated her and perhaps dare I say been interested in finding out the truth, rather than just covering their own asses every time my ex sneezed another gob of lies. They would have perhaps jailed her for a week or two when I proved on multiple occasions that she had lied to the court. If you were there, you could be forgiven for thinking that I was up on murder charges rather than what was actually happening, i.e. that I was bringing a case against her for denying me access to our children.
If god existed and I were he, I would build a special place in hell for white knight mangina judges who give female psychopaths wings, ...and if my gran had balls I'd call her granddad, ...ancient Greek proverb.
Best wishes to all my fellow personae non gratae and don’t forget, ABR for your own safety against ubiquitous biologically hardwired gynocentrism and the resultant rampant misandry that is the sea within which we swim today as ever. Long live the evolution, role on the true egalitarian renaissance.
This led me to wonder about actual clinical criteria for PBD's as defined by the professional psychiatric community.
One doesn't have to dig too deep to find repeated references to psychopathy, anti-social disorders, and sociopathology.
Do these clinical descriptions have any relevant relationship to feminism today?
Quote
* AGGRESSIVE SOCIOPATHS derive strong, yet nonperverse gratification from harming others. They like to hurt, frighten, tyrannize, bully, and manipulate. They do it for a sense of power and control, and will often only drop subtle hints about what they are up to. They polish their aggressive, domineering manner in such a way to disguise any intimidation others might feel.
They seek out positions of power, such as parent, teacher, bureaucrat, supervisor, or police officer. Their style is one of passive aggression as they systematically go about sabotaging the ideas of others to get their ideas in place.
... They are usually effective at getting their way, and are especially vindictive if resisted or crossed. They don't follow the social norm of reciprocity like others do.
Quote
(A Checklist of Sociopathic Traits - PCL-R by Hare.):
1. GLIB and SUPERFICIAL CHARM -- the tendency to be smooth, engaging, charming, slick, and verbally facile. Psychopathic charm is not in the least shy, self-conscious, or afraid to say anything. A psychopath never gets tongue-tied. They have freed themselves from the social conventions about taking turns in talking, for example.
2. GRANDIOSE SELF-WORTH -- a grossly inflated view of one's abilities and self-worth, self-assured, opinionated, cocky, a braggart. Psychopaths are arrogant people who believe they are superior human beings.
3. NEED FOR STIMULATION or PRONENESS TO BOREDOM -- an excessive need for novel, thrilling, and exciting stimulation; taking chances and doing things that are risky. Psychopaths often have a low self-discipline in carrying tasks through to completion because they get bored easily. They fail to work at the same job for any length of time, for example, or to finish tasks that they consider dull or routine.
4. PATHOLOGICAL LYING -- can be moderate or high; in moderate form, they will be shrewd, crafty, cunning, sly, and clever; in extreme form, they will be deceptive, deceitful, underhanded, unscrupulous, manipulative, and dishonest.
5. CONNING AND MANIPULATIVENESS- the use of deceit and deception to cheat, con, or defraud others for personal gain; distinguished from Item #4 in the degree to which exploitation and callous ruthlessness is present, as reflected in a lack of concern for the feelings and suffering of one's victims.
6. LACK OF REMORSE OR GUILT -- a lack of feelings or concern for the losses, pain, and suffering of victims; a tendency to be unconcerned, dispassionate, coldhearted, and unempathic. This item is usually demonstrated by a disdain for one's victims.
7. SHALLOW AFFECT -- emotional poverty or a limited range or depth of feelings; interpersonal coldness in spite of signs of open gregariousness.
8. CALLOUSNESS and LACK OF EMPATHY -- a lack of feelings toward people in general; cold, contemptuous, inconsiderate, and tactless.
9. PARASITIC LIFESTYLE -- an intentional, manipulative, selfish, and exploitative financial dependence on others as reflected in a lack of motivation, low self-discipline, and inability to begin or complete responsibilities.
10. POOR BEHAVIORAL CONTROLS -- expressions of irritability, annoyance, impatience, threats, aggression, and verbal abuse; inadequate control of anger and temper; acting hastily.
11. PROMISCUOUS SEXUAL BEHAVIOR -- a variety of brief, superficial relations, numerous affairs, and an indiscriminate selection of sexual partners; the maintenance of several relationships at the same time; a history of attempts to sexually coerce others into sexual activity or taking great pride at discussing sexual exploits or conquests.
12. EARLY BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS -- a variety of behaviors prior to age 13, including lying, theft, cheating, vandalism, bullying, sexual activity, fire-setting, glue-sniffing, alcohol use, and running away from home.
13. LACK OF REALISTIC, LONG-TERM GOALS -- an inability or persistent failure to develop and execute long-term plans and goals; a nomadic existence, aimless, lacking direction in life.
14. IMPULSIVITY -- the occurrence of behaviors that are unpremeditated and lack reflection or planning; inability to resist temptation, frustrations, and urges; a lack of deliberation without considering the consequences; foolhardy, rash, unpredictable, erratic, and reckless.
15. IRRESPONSIBILITY -- repeated failure to fulfill or honor obligations and commitments; such as not paying bills, defaulting on loans, performing sloppy work, being absent or late to work, failing to honor contractual agreements.
16. FAILURE TO ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR OWN ACTIONS -- a failure to accept responsibility for one's actions reflected in low conscientiousness, an absence of dutifulness, antagonistic manipulation, denial of responsibility, and an effort to manipulate others through this denial.
17. MANY SHORT-TERM MARITAL RELATIONSHIPS -- a lack of commitment to a long-term relationship reflected in inconsistent, undependable, and unreliable commitments in life, including marital.
18. JUVENILE DELINQUENCY -- behavior problems between the ages of 13-18; mostly behaviors that are crimes or clearly involve aspects of antagonism, exploitation, aggression, manipulation, or a callous, ruthless tough-mindedness.
19. REVOCATION OF CONDITION RELEASE -- a revocation of probation or other conditional release due to technical violations, such as carelessness, low deliberation, or failing to appear.
20. CRIMINAL VERSATILITY -- a diversity of types of criminal offenses, regardless if the person has been arrested or convicted for them; taking great pride at getting away with crimes.
http://faculty.ncwc.edu/toconnor/428/428lect16.htm
Source
Angelo: Good observation. It's technically illegal for me to say this thanks to the rules of the secret UK kangaroo so-called family courts, so naturally I will in spite that Orwellian folly.
...Around eight years ago I made a similar observation to the judge who gave off an air that was a cross between the judge in the David Bowie film 'Merry Christmas Mr Lawrence and Black Adder's General Melched, "I'll have you shot for being rude to a lady" regarding my ex who was actively trying to get me imprisoned on a myriad of spurious charges, none of which stuck, but did muddy the waters plenty to her advantage.
My point was that completely flummoxed by my ex's behaviour, bearing in mind that we had children, that she was unscrupulously willing to use and abuse, ...I had discovered a list of ten behaviours that defined malignant narcissism and so I made the judge aware of this discovery and how it precisely mirrored the behaviour of the uncooperative party seeking sole custody.
She absolutely went from a person that I knew to be egalitarian and warm to a sociopath. I wouldn't have staid for six years or a New York Minute, being a natural born give no and take no shit egalitarian or MGTOW and I definitely would not have had children with the cold, calculating entitled radical feminist and the rest, malignant narcissist she had clearly hidden well.
To illustrate the dangers here, ...this is a woman who at one time had sat with me and a friend who was suffering due to the struggle to see his children and at that point she had shown great sympathy and stated clearly that she would never do such a thing, something I took as a good sign, but in hindsight that was a trap.
That’s the problem with sociopaths; they are very difficult to spot. I've fluked 156 IQ this year and missed it, ...if you see a flash of the lunatic, it's not period issues, it's a fucking lunatic, so get out immediately!
So it is with feminism, after all it took us long enough to speak up. I only went marching with F4J in 2002 because I was staring into an abyss of fear for my children, because malignant feminism came to my house and knocked down the door to take my kids and give them to a stone cold calculated perjurer with 0 remorse who spent the subsequent years convincing our/her kids that I had abandoned them, even as I was marching with 299 other father Christmas’s to stop my children losing their father for what the stats were saying was highly likely to be forever. Coo coo!
That's the issue with feminism right there; it's excellent cover for malignant narcissism.
As for a fair and actually just court, ...they would have treated the entire affair completely differently, for starters they would have treated me as well as they treated her and perhaps dare I say been interested in finding out the truth, rather than just covering their own asses every time my ex sneezed another gob of lies. They would have perhaps jailed her for a week or two when I proved on multiple occasions that she had lied to the court. If you were there, you could be forgiven for thinking that I was up on murder charges rather than what was actually happening, i.e. that I was bringing a case against her for denying me access to our children.
If god existed and I were he, I would build a special place in hell for white knight mangina judges who give female psychopaths wings, ...and if my gran had balls I'd call her granddad, ...ancient Greek proverb.
Best wishes to all my fellow personae non gratae and don’t forget, ABR for your own safety against ubiquitous biologically hardwired gynocentrism and the resultant rampant misandry that is the sea within which we swim today as ever. Long live the evolution, role on the true egalitarian renaissance.
No comments:
Post a Comment