UK Gang Of Transgender Women Drop Kick 19-Year-Old Man

Sandman: "Gang of Transgender women drop-kicked then stamped on 19-year-old-man in London Tube attack after he told them they needed to have female genitalia to be women." I wouldn't be surprised if language and words are a form of assault in the UK already and that the 19 year old man was sent off to jail for making his statements. According to some people in the UK words are violent.

So it's only fair to meet violence with violence. Even if one form takes the form of words and the other takes the form of fists. So in a sense what these 4 TransWhamen did to him should sarcastically be called self defense. I'll discuss more in just a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor The MGTOW's guide to retiring on 200k in Southeast Asia: Anyways, now back to the video. So two members of the gang of transwhamen were sentenced to six-months curfew because the judge was probably worried they would come over and smack him down too for even taking the case to court. Of the other two one of them was sentenced to 20 days rehabilitation activity. One of them was given conditional discharge for two years. So I guess that's something. There's even a video of them stomping the guy at that link I shared. Those stilettos are dangerous weapons when they are stomping down on your junk. George Orwell got that line from 1984 wrong. He said that the future looks like a masculine boot stomping on a man's face from here to eternity. In reality he should have wrote that the future is a sharp and pointy Stiletto smashing your package for all eternity. But even he wasn't progressive enough to see the future was males dressing up as females calling themselves female. People can call themselves anything they want and others have the right to accept or reject it. I have the right to use words and language that may or may not offend you. Just like you have every right to live a lifestyle that may or may no offend me. That's what freedom is all about. If this were a situation where it was four men beat up a woman they would probably serve at least a year or two in prison. If it were four guys beating up another guy they would be going to prison for six months to a year. But because it's four trans women they don't have to play with drop to soap Tyrone in the big house. The 19 year old man that was beaten was taken to hospital having severe abrasions and a black eye. The judge with most fitting name in this case, Nigel Seed, told the trans gang this and I quote: "I accept that had it not been for the alleged victim in this case there probably wouldn't have been an incident." unquote. But what kind of logic is that? Imagine if you were in court after someone had stolen your car and the judge saying "Well if it hadn't been for you owning that Ferrari there wouldn't have been the crime of grand theft auto. What kind of precedent is this judge setting? also the man that was beaten is the alleged victim according to the judge.