Executive summary
In the October 2022 version of the FAA Guide for Aviation Medical Examiners, the FAA quietly widened the EKG parameters beyond the normal range (from a PR max of .2 to unlimited). And they didn’t widen the range by a little. They widened it by a lot. It was done after the vaccine rollout.
This is extraordinary. They did it hoping nobody would notice. It worked for a while. Nobody caught it.
But you can’t hide these things for long.
This is a tacit admission from the US government that the COVID vaccine has damaged the hearts of our pilots. Not just a few pilots. A lot of pilots and a lot of damage.
The cardiac harm of course is not limited to pilots.
My best guess right now is that over 50M Americans sustained some amount of heart damage from the shot.
That’s a lot of people who will be very upset when they realize the vaccine they took to reduce their chance of dying from COVID actually worked in reverse making it:
More likely that people will get COVID
Be hospitalized from COVID and other diseases
Die from COVID (and other diseases)
You also have an excellent chance of getting a lifetime of heart damage for no extra charge.
But don’t worry; you can’t sue them. They fixed the law so none of them aren’t liable (the doctors, the drug companies, the government). After all, you took the vaccine of your own free will. It’s not like you were forced (or coerced) to take it or anything like that! And there were plenty of people warning you not to take the shots (even though they censored most of them).
In this article, I will explain the evidence and thinking behind all my claims.
As I learn more, I will refine the estimate.
Introduction
On October 24, 2022, the FAA quietly, without any announcement at all, widened the EKG requirements necessary for pilots to be able to fly.
The PR (a measure of heart function) used to be in the range of .12 to .2.
It is now: .12 to .3 and potentially even higher.
This is a very wide range; it accommodates people who have cardiac injury. Cardiologist Thomas Levy is appalled at this change:
Why did they make the change?
Why would they do that?
I’ll take an educated guess as to why they did that. I believe it is because they knew if they kept the original range, too many pilots would have to be grounded. That would be extremely problematic; commercial aviation in the US would be severely disrupted.
And why did they do that quietly without notifying the public or the mainstream media?
I’m pretty sure they won’t tell me, so I’ll speculate: it’s because they didn’t want anyone to know.
In other words, the COVID vaccine has seriously injured a lot of pilots and the FAA knows it and said nothing because that would tip off the country that the vaccines are unsafe. And you aren’t allowed to do that.
Why we sure it was the vaccine that did it
There are several clues that are consistent with “it was the vaccine and not COVID”:
They were quiet about it. If it was COVID, you can be public. But the vaccine is supposed to be safe.
The timing. October 2022 is late for COVID. If it was due to COVID, it would have happened well before now. They can make changes every month.
The vaccine creates far more injury to the heart than COVID (which creates NO added risk per this large-scale Israeli study of 196,992 unvaccinated adults after Covid infection).
Anecdotally, cardiologists only started to notice the damage post-vaccine.
All the sudden deaths started post-vaccine.
The data supporting my 20% damage estimate
I know from a study of 177 people in Puerto Rico (97% of whom were vaccinated) ages 8 to 84, that 70% of those people, when screened for cardiac injury using an FDA-approved testing device (from Heart Care Corp), exhibited objective signs of cardiac injury.
There was a study done on pilots. It will be published in The Epoch Times later this week. That indicated heart damage in over 20% of pilots screened (The Epoch Times will release the exact number).
The Thailand study showed nearly 30% of kids had abnormal cardiac biomarkers after the shot. But kids are indestructible so a 30% injury rate in kids translates into a higher rate for adults.
VAERS shows that cardiac damage happens at all ages, not just the young:
Bottom line: The most logical conclusion is that the FAA knows the hearts of our nations pilots have been injured by the COVID vaccine that they were coerced into taking, the number of pilots affected is huge, the cardiac damage is extensive, and passenger safety is being compromised by the lowering of the standards to enable pilots to fly.
The right thing would be for the FAA to come clean and admit to the American public that the COVID vaccine has injured 20% or more of the pilots (based on their limited EKG screening), but I doubt that they will ever do that.
The change: from 200 msec to 300 msec and beyond
The changes were made on October 24, 2022 to the GUIDE FOR AVIATION MEDICAL EXAMINERS.
Here is the change log where you can see the change listed (see page 4):
Here is what the policy was before the change. It was just one row:
Here are what it looks like as of Oct 24, 2022 (click the image to see the context):
So it’s now two rows, one for less than 300 ms (it used to be 200 ms), and a second row to handle 300 ms or more.
For more information about the change, see Myocarditis: Once Rare, Now Common.
The Thailand study
In the US, we are not allowed to do lab tests on people before and after the vaccine.
The reason for that is simple: it would make it crystal clear that the vaccines are unsafe. That is why there are no before/after studies in the US. There never will be.
Why? Because that is how science works in America today: it’s unethical to design a study that might expose that the COVID vaccines that they forced us to take cause harm.
Think I’m kidding about how they game the trials? Get yourself a copy of Turtles All the Way Down and just read the first chapter. It’s eye opening.
Even though we can’t do a before/after study in the US, they did such a study in Thailand on 301 kids. They found that 29.24% of the participants developed cardiac injuries within days after they got the second shot:
But here’s the most important part about that study that nobody points out:
None of the tests that were done in the Thailand study included doing a cardiac MRI with contrast on all the participants since that would be expensive and invasive. That test is the gold-standard for cardiac injury.
In other words, the 29% rate of injury was a lower bound of injury.
If you did a cardiac MRI on all those kids, you are going to find stuff that you will not find using the cheap and easy tests. Maybe a lot of stuff.
Summary
I believe that the actual rate of heart injury from these vaccines will be found to be well over the 29.7% rate of heart damage in the Thailand study.
At a more conservative 20% injury rate, we are looking at 50M Americans with heart damage caused by the jab.
As more studies are done, it’s going to be crystal clear why so many people are dying suddenly, especially kids. It’s also going to explain why nursing homes have lost up to 33% of their residents in 12 months where before they were losing only 1 or 2% a year. It’s going to explain why I was unable to find even a single nursing home where the all-cause mortality dropped after the vaccines rolled out. And it’s going to explain why none of the nursing homes wanted to talk to me about what happened to people after the shots rolled out.
Confidence in the CDC and the medical community should hit rock bottom after it is revealed how extensive the damage caused by these vaccines is.
The fact that the Thailand study was published in a peer-reviewed journal, that they only did the easy-to-do assessments (which only found a portion of the damage), and the FAA quietly changed their EKG guidance should at least open your mind to the possibility that I might be right.
This narrative is going to start falling apart at an accelerated rate.
Stay tuned. The best is yet to come. And it’s going to be epic.
The COVID vaccines cause strokes. There is no doubt about it.
In fact, I’m so sure of this, I will bet anyone $1M. I’m willing to put my money where my mouth is. Are any of the drug companies willing to do that? If they don’t, you should be worried. Very worried.
Surely there is someone at the CDC or FDA who will take my bet? If not, then why not admit the truth: that they have absolutely no confidence at all when they claim that the COVID vaccines don’t cause strokes and there is nothing to worry about.
Will anyone in the entire world take my bet? Of course not. You have to ask yourself, why not? Don’t you believe the CDC? Apparently, NOBODY IN THE ENTIRE WORLD believes them.
In this article, I’m going to prove to you I’m right.
But, hey, if you think I’m wrong, accept my bet please! Because I could always use an extra $1M.
Introduction
Thanks to the heroic work of Dr. Naomi Wolf and Amy Kelly in investigating the Pfizer documents, it was recently brought to my attention that Pfizer knew about 300 stroke-related events that happened in the first 3 months after the vaccine was released.
Check out this document which summarizes the stroke data from the new unredacted Pfizer 5.3.6 document. There were a total of 42,086 adverse events, but it was a secret as to how many people that represents (the denominator).
We can estimate it though because they told us that there were 611 anaphylaxis events. We know from the Blumenthal paper that there are 2.4 cases of anaphylaxis per 10,000 shots. This implies 2.5M shots were given which means 1.25M people reported events here. This is an estimate of the “denominator” that Pfizer didn’t disclose.
The reason for redacting the denominator is simple: if anyone knew how small that number was, they’d have stopped the vaccine immediately. If the denominator was large, Pfizer would be willfully supplying the denominator. The fact that they aren’t disclosing the denominator means that they knew that the adverse event rate was unacceptably high.
What’s interesting is that the disclosed the denominator: 126,212,580 which is 64M people. OBVIOUSLY THE EVENTS WERE SEVERELY UNDERREPORTED as we can see from the anaphylaxis data. So that number is meaningless. What matters is the estimated underreporting factor; we know from the calculation above that the minimum underreporting factor (for serious events) is 50.4. This is quite comparable to the minimum underreporting factor of 41X for VAERS.
The Pfizer document says:
The reporting is for a 90 day period starting Dec 1, 2020
Within the stroke data set, there are 275 patients with 300 different events reported; and 20% of the stroke events were fatal.
Half the events happened within 2 days of the shot.
Is the temporal proximity to the shot a smoking gun? Sort of…
OK. When I read that my first reaction was, “Wow, half the events happened in 48 hours after the shot. That’s not normal at all…it should be spread out evenly over time if there is no causality.”
However, upon further investigation, many of the AEs reported by Pfizer have relatively short median time frames so there is a bias to report things that happened in close proximity to the shot and to not report things that happened a week or more after the shot.
Even with all that, a 48 hour median is short compared to the other AEs and suggests there is causality here.
The rate of stroke events vs COVID events is 1:4… that’s way too high
Let’s look at the rate of stroke events to COVID events reported in the trial.
We’ll limit ourselves to the first two days since that is when we get the most accurate rate.
So we have 150 stroke events in the first two days as noted above.
We have 3067 COVID events with a median of 5 days, so basically 613 events in the first two days.
That means that during the first two days after the shot (which is the only period where we get reliable reports), you were 4 times more likely to get COVID than get a stroke.
Whoa! That’s way too high for a safe vaccine that doesn’t cause stroke, don’t you think?
The absolute number of stroke events is 10X normal
150 stroke events in 2 days for 1.25M people reporting is a rate of stroke 21,900 strokes per million per year.
The normal rate of stroke is 800,000 strokes/yr. But there are 340M people. So the rate is 2353 strokes/M-yr.
This means that the observed rate of stroke is 10X normal after the shot.
That sounds pretty darn causal to me.
But let’s do another check just to make sure.
After all, we wouldn’t want to leave any stone unturned for Dr. Susan Oliver and her dog Cindy, to use to make a video criticizing these calculations. Confidentially, I’m not that worried about Dr. Oliver; it’s her dog Cindy I worry about.
The VAERS data makes it OBVIOUS
Here’s a simple search that took me all of 30 seconds to do. I searched ALL vaccines for ischaemic stroke and look what I found. A signal. A big signal! It jumps off the page. You can’t miss it if you are looking!
INSTRUCTIONS: View the chart above. Can you spot the unsafe vaccine? Hint: It causes strokes at a much higher rate than all the other vaccines combined. Can you guess which one it is?
If you guess the COVID vaccine, you’re right!
If you didn’t guess the COVID vaccine, you should immediately apply for a job with the CDC in the safety monitoring department. They are looking for people with your analytical skills.
The 1,549 death reports
The surveys of dead people show (I limited the records to US only, sanity checked, and deaths from 2021 onwards):
10/170 unvaccinated died of neurological causes: 5.8%
75/666 vaccinated died of neurological causes: 11.2%
The percentages should the the same. They aren’t.
The result is statistically significant with p=.0455.
However, there can be age confounding.
Let’s look at <50 year olds
1/18 unvaxxed=.055
5/78 vaxxed = .064
So these are closer as we’d expect, but the numbers are too small here to get a good signal. Too noisy.
Let’s look at those over 65:
unvaxxed 7/104=.067
vaxxed 53/400=.1323
Big difference.
We have a very dangerous vaccine here. Too bad the CDC doesn’t do their own survey of dead people by vaccination status, isn’t it? They’d have found this out 2 years ago.
Oddly, to this day, they don’t want to look at this. It’s so easy. It took about an hour of my time to do this. Why don’t they want to know.
Personal anecdotes
There is nothing like personal experience to make sure we got it right. I hear these stories of young people dying of strokes or bleeding in the brain. Horrible. You don’t forget these.
People who have seen multiple black swans
Have you ever heard of a healthy 23 year old who has 8 strokes after getting vaccinated? I got this note from Marc on Jan 18, 2023:
Dear Steve,
I had a dear friend who had been in remission for some sort of cancer and was doing week then he died suddenly from stroke IN HIS SUKKAH in Sept 2021.
Not long after his 2nd vaxx as I understand it. His name was Harry. We drank coffee together and I miss him. He used to pick up my daughter from school or work if my wife had our car. We learned torah together and were a bit late starters with our Judaism. We both have a daughter.
We know of another beautiful 22 yr old – friend of our daughter - from South Africa, was living near TelAviv and had something like 8 strokes after her 2nd vaccination (Pfizer). She finally went back to South Africa and had open heart surgery. I hear she is thank G’d doing well. We pray for her every day. I met her finally last year at a wedding. Beautiful person – inside and out.
It is a tragedy beyond comprehension what has gone on here and how there is STILL no accountability.
Keep going.
Mechanism of action
The PEG enables the LNP to cross the blood brain barrier. There, the vaccine causes both clotting and inflammation. This is well know.
The safety signal in VAERS and VSD: The final nail in the coffin
And finally, we have official CDC safety signals that were triggered in both VAERS and VSD.
That’s the final nail in the coffin.
Poll
Note
I originally wrote this as a $10M dollar bet but realized that would work against me (even though it would be more profitable).
The $1M is a much lower bar… it shows that they wouldn’t even bet $1M that the CDC is right.
If there are no takers, maybe I should lower the bet until I get a taker. This will quantify in dollars just how much people believe the CDC. Wouldn’t that be cool? I think the number will be vanishingly small.
For more information on the Pfizer data
I want to acknowledge the work of Dr. Naomi Wolf, Amy Kelly, and the rest of the dailyclout.io for their excellent work in surfacing the data and bringing it to people’s attention.
Here are a couple of links you can follow to learn more.
The birth rates are dropping all over the world. In some countries, the drop is more than they’ve seen in the last 150 years. AFAIK, we have never seen a simultaneous drop in birth rates worldwide like we are seeing today.
I asked one of the fact checkers about what is causing this and he said, “it could be lots of things such as nervousness about the economy.” I asked for the evidentiary basis for that hypothesis but it was not provided. That’s just the way science works. If things don’t go your way, just make something up.
Remember: if someone tries to bamboozle you like that, always ask for the data behind their hypothesis. It’s rarely there.
In this video, Dr. Naomi Wolf talks about all the evidence Pfizer knew very early in the rollout that this was not a safe vaccine.
Summary
We looked at the evidence eight different ways and all the evidence is consistent: the COVID vaccines cause strokes.
Furthermore, it isn’t just correlation; we have causality because all five Bradford Hill criteria are met.
Finally, this is so obvious to everyone that I am certain that NOBODY IN THE ENTIRE WORLD BELIEVES OTHERWISE.
If anyone believed I was wrong, they’d be rushing to take my $1M.
I predict no takers. I’d be delighted to be proven wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment