Indeed, there is strong and rather conclusive evidence available that completely wipes off the table the mainstream belief of the origins of the number 6,000,000 – in relation to jews and the second world war.
In June the Mindener Tageblatt reported that German police had searched Haverbeck’s house as part of ongoing investigations into her holocaust denial. She has criminally been charged according to various reports.
It can not be denied that the assumed victors of both world wars have written the history books in such ways as they wanted next generations to be indoctrinated in the future while the facts be damned. As a result also today in relation to more recent developments and events anyone trying to expose major lies is branded an extremist or potential terrorist.
Can the criminalization of questioning the holocaust be compared to the criminalization of questioning the official man made global warming narrative as many are now suggesting? And can the criminalization of wanting to travel to ISIS-held territories also be compared in the same manner? And if so. Is it because in all three cases there are major lies to remain secret for the general public?
I say yes and eventually the truth must come out and future generations will look back and condemn the frauds of the past. It can’t possibly be any different as long as at least one hardcore information rebel is alive.
Also see: Why do the numbers for Auschwitz-Birkenau keep changing?
Source
10 newspapers dating from 1915 to 1938 (The Sun New York, June 6, 1915; New York Times, October 18, 1918; New York Times, September 8, 1919; New York Times, November 12, 1919; Atlanta Constitution, February 23, 1920; New York Times, May 7, 1920; New York Times, July 20, 1921; Montreal Gazette, December 29, 1931; New York Times, May 31, 1936; New York Times, February 23, 1938) – before there was any mentioning by governments and press back then of any holocaust and before alleged holocaust activities in Germany – attest to the fact that the number 6 million already was widely used BEFORE WW2 and at least since 1915. Thus completely proving false the scholarly belief that the term ‘6 million jews’ originated during and after world war 2 (youtube.com/watch?v=Dda-0Q_XUhk).Last March the German national TV channel ARD 1 interviewed Haverbeck in which she was allowed to voice her doubts and to raise questions. Likely the first ever such program broadcasted in Germany, and across Europe, since the war since Germany has strict laws forbidding its citizens to openly question the holocaust, especially in cases where the government believes this could cause the disturbance of public order. Which is in fact a wide blanket to outlaw any criticism at all.
In June the Mindener Tageblatt reported that German police had searched Haverbeck’s house as part of ongoing investigations into her holocaust denial. She has criminally been charged according to various reports.
It can not be denied that the assumed victors of both world wars have written the history books in such ways as they wanted next generations to be indoctrinated in the future while the facts be damned. As a result also today in relation to more recent developments and events anyone trying to expose major lies is branded an extremist or potential terrorist.
Can the criminalization of questioning the holocaust be compared to the criminalization of questioning the official man made global warming narrative as many are now suggesting? And can the criminalization of wanting to travel to ISIS-held territories also be compared in the same manner? And if so. Is it because in all three cases there are major lies to remain secret for the general public?
I say yes and eventually the truth must come out and future generations will look back and condemn the frauds of the past. It can’t possibly be any different as long as at least one hardcore information rebel is alive.
Also see: Why do the numbers for Auschwitz-Birkenau keep changing?
Source
No comments:
Post a Comment