The real cause of the unrest is mass immigration imposed on Britain against the wishes of the native population.
By John Daniel Davidson: The rioting in Britain is what happens when a country’s political
class tries to depoliticize mass immigration — smearing anyone who
objects to it as “far-right” — and then imposes a policy of mass
immigration by force. At some point, the people revolt.
Britain’s liberal elites have latched onto online misinformation and
racism from the far-right as an explanation for the riots. But the real
explanation is that Britain’s leaders have sold their countrymen out for
decades, importing an unassimilated foreign population against the
wishes of native Britons. That is a recipe for social unrest, civic
strife, and ethnic conflict, which is exactly what Britain’s ruling
class has brought about.
Set aside the triggering incident — in this case, a horrifying knife
attack that left three little girls dead in Southport, a town in
northwest England. It doesn’t matter that the accused attacker,
17-year-old Axel Muganwa Rudakubana, is neither a Muslim nor an
immigrant, but merely the son of Rwandan immigrants. What matters is
that this attack was the latest in a long string of attacks by
non-native Britons against the native population, and that it occurred
in the context of ongoing mass immigration. The riots have been labeled
“anti-Muslim” and “far-right” by the government and the corporate press,
but they are really anti-immigration, and not at all restricted to the
far-right. Demonstrators have been quite clear about this, chanting
“stop the boats” and “we want our country back.” Those are reasonable
sentiments for ordinary citizens to express about their homeland,
whatever Britain’s ruling elite might say.
