Women:
1. 50-year-old woman who is a doctor. (She is the only one in the group who understands medicine and could possibly use the medical facilities in the bunker)
2. 13-year-old girl with no meaningful skills. (She is missing both her arms.)
3. 30-year-old woman who is a master chef.
4. 23-year-old woman who is a model but is borderline retarded.
5. 32-year-old woman who is a genius and a painter.
6. 18-year-old woman who is ugly as sin. She has no meaningful skills, handicaps or advantages.
7. 13-year-old girl who is a 10/10 but is literally mentally retarded.
8. 18-year-old woman who is average looking but is murderously violent.
9. 16-year-old girl who is good looking. She has no meaningful skills, advantages or handicaps. However, she has herpes.
10. 18-year-old woman who is a 10/10, is an expert in horticulture, but is sterile.
Men:
1. 60-year-old man who is a soldier. (He is the only one who would know to properly use and maintain all the weapons in the bunker)
2. 18-year-old man who is an expert in horticulture but is average every other way.
3. 25-year-old man who is an Einstein level genius and a philosopher.
4. 35-year-old man who is average in every way. (He is the only one in the group who knows how to use the communication equipment in the bunker.)
5. 30-year-old man who is a master at mixed martial arts.
6. 40-year-old man who knows 7 different languages but is average every other way.
7. 45-year-old man who is a master carpenter.
8. 18-year-old man who is very strong but has no other meaningful traits.
9. 35-year-old man who is a master at chemistry.
10. Turd Flinging Monkey - 35 year old, master of economics.
In no particular order, I would vote in the following women:
ReplyDelete[a] 50-year-old woman who is a doctor.
[b] 13-year-old girl with no meaningful skills.
[c] 30-year-old woman who is a master chef.
[d] 32-year-old woman who is a genius and a painter.
[e] 16-year-old girl who is good looking, with herpes.
Although women are the reproductive bottleneck and it would therefore be logical to vote in more women, voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil and I refuse to do that with the 5 utterly unacceptable women of this group. There are enough acceptable women to make them 50% and the doctor can keep herpes girl's [who is the least acceptable] issues under control.
In no particular order, I would vote in the following men:
[a] 18-year-old man who is an expert in horticulture.
[b] 25-year-old man who is a sub Socratic level genius and philosopher.
[c] 35-year-old man who is average in every way, but knows how to use the communication equipment.
[d] 35-year-old man who is a master at chemistry.
[e] 45-year-old man who is a master carpenter.
As is clear from my list, I have little time for those whose only use is physical violence. I would choose useful men.
I am a gifted mathematician who quit economics at 15 because I fount it to be a flawed discipline, ...a fact that the so-called high master economist Alan Greenspan only figured out [so he claims] a couple of years ago after he fucked up the world economy by a means that most enlightened cultures new to be anathema thousands of years ago, ...i.e. via usury and other economists slight of hand.. So I could live without TFM and trust to my choices to allow for a truly egalitarian outcome.