Telling the truth has become a revolutionary act, so let us salute those who disclose the necessary facts.
ALTERNATIVE NEWS
18 Sept 2015
Corbyn Pro EU Pro NATO Pro Mass Migration + Making Refugees Insures Loyalty To Fiat Money
Rise Of The Supernanny Feminists
By Joanna Williams: It can’t have taken #fearlessfeminist Charlotte Proudman long to choose the best turn of phrase for her public scolding of Alexander Carter-Silk, the man who had the temerity to tell her that her LinkedIn profile picture looked ‘stunning’. In reaching for the word ‘unacceptable’, Proudman repeats the tip-of-the-tongue buzzword of today’s unappointed language police.
The AGM Of 15 Square Britain's Leading Anti-MGM [Male Genital Mutilation] Charity
It took place last Saturday, and it was a very interesting event. It was good to meet so many anti-MGM campaigners for the first time.
Bank Of England Economist Calls For Cash Ban, Urges Negative Rates
Andy Haldane, one of the Bank’s nine interest rate setters, made the case for the "radical" option of supporting the economy with negative interest rates, and even suggested that cash could have to be abolished.
Hypergamy Pt 1: It's Existence & AWALT + Hypergamy Floats
Sandi Toxic On Last Night’s Question Time - Self-Nomination For A Gormless Feminist Of The Month Award
By Mike Buchanan: Sandi Toxic, spokeswoman for the Women’s Equality Party, was on Question Time last night. The iPlayer file will be available for 11 months. Four of her contributions are worth listening to:
2:45 – 4:32
She responds to the question, ‘Is Labour now more electable under Jeremy Corbyn, than it was under Ed Miliband?’
20:44 – 21:50
She talks after John McDonnell, Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, had apologised for remarks he’d made about the IRA’s contribution to the peace process in Northern Ireland.
35:54 – 37:45
She responds to the question from a 17-year-old man, put to Liz Truss, a Conservative MP, ‘When I’m eligible to vote, why should I choose the Conservatives over Labour?’ It’s in this section she nominates herself for a Gormless Feminist of the Month award, with this gem:
2:45 – 4:32
She responds to the question, ‘Is Labour now more electable under Jeremy Corbyn, than it was under Ed Miliband?’
20:44 – 21:50
She talks after John McDonnell, Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, had apologised for remarks he’d made about the IRA’s contribution to the peace process in Northern Ireland.
35:54 – 37:45
She responds to the question from a 17-year-old man, put to Liz Truss, a Conservative MP, ‘When I’m eligible to vote, why should I choose the Conservatives over Labour?’ It’s in this section she nominates herself for a Gormless Feminist of the Month award, with this gem:
Women are the majority, major beneficiaries of the welfare system. The real question that we have to be asking ourselves is, ‘Why are women the load bearers of austerity, and what are we going to do about it?’Her diversionary ploy of stating, ‘The real question we have to be asking ourselves is…’ is straight out of the Feminist Guide to Media Manipulation.
Belinda Brown Talks On BBC Woman Sour About The Charlotte Proudman Debacle
One of those women is the Belinda Brown, a social anthropologist and a Maggie award winner who talks from 9:20 and makes some very relevant points, including about feminism.
Obamessiah Meets Pope Francis, Misleaders Converge On UN
Brawl Breaks Out In Japanese Parliament Over “War Bill”
17 Sept 2015
Ann Coulter Accuses US Republican Candidates Of Pandering To ‘Fucking Jews’
David Duke: Controversial pundit tweets ‘how many fucking Jews do these people
think there are in the United States?’ after several candidates in
Republican debate stress improved U.S. ties with Israel.
Controversial conservative pundit Ann Coulter posted a series
of arguably anti-Jewish tweets at the tail end of Wednesday night’s
Republican debate, accusing the candidates of pandering to Jewish
voters, including one posing the hypothetical question of: “How many
fucking Jews do these people think there are in the United States?”
Coulter, who has 660,000 Twitter followers, was reacting to the
frequent mentions of Israel made by participants in the second televised
Republican debate held Wednesday at the Ronald Reagan Library in
California.
She first tweeted criticism of former Arkansas Governor Mike
Huckabee, Florida Senator Marco Rubio and New Jersey Governor Chris
Christie’s support for Israel when answering the question “What will
AMERICA [emphasis her’s] look like after you are president?”, asking
“How many fucking Jews do these people think there are in the United
States?” She also wrote: “Good Grief, Huckabee is running for prime
minister of Israel.”
Sexbots Increase The Market Value Of Some Women. Bring ‘Em On!
By Janet Bloomfield (aka JudgyBitch): Economics is often called ‘the dismal science’, and having sat through graduate level courses in Economics as part of my MBA, I can verify that claim.
I found economics to be incredibly frustrating because it can
articulate grand concepts like supply, demand, consumption, distribution
and production, but higher order analysis is founded on two completely
wrong assumptions. First, economic analysis assumes that people act in
their own self-interest always, and it assumes people have all the
relevant information they need to make a decision. Clearly, these two
assumptions are wildly,
grossly incorrect: people do not
always act in their own self-interest (which is why Donald Trump will
be the next POTUS), and people rarely have all the information they need
to make decisions, because there’s simply too many variables to
consider.
I do not have the ‘all numbers and calculations are inherently interesting’ gene, and therefore, given that all economic analysis proceeds on the basic of two deeply flawed assumptions, I found the math maddening. There appeared to be no point, other than to make pretty graphs. Economics is not like finance, which also requires some complex calculations and advanced quant skills, but at the end of a long series of numbers, you are left with something useful, such as the ability to calculate the future value of a stream of money over x amount of time at y rate of interest. You can go backwards and discount a sum, too! All very useful. Economics, not so much.
grossly incorrect: people do not
always act in their own self-interest (which is why Donald Trump will
be the next POTUS), and people rarely have all the information they need
to make decisions, because there’s simply too many variables to
consider.I do not have the ‘all numbers and calculations are inherently interesting’ gene, and therefore, given that all economic analysis proceeds on the basic of two deeply flawed assumptions, I found the math maddening. There appeared to be no point, other than to make pretty graphs. Economics is not like finance, which also requires some complex calculations and advanced quant skills, but at the end of a long series of numbers, you are left with something useful, such as the ability to calculate the future value of a stream of money over x amount of time at y rate of interest. You can go backwards and discount a sum, too! All very useful. Economics, not so much.
The Monstrous Male Gaze
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

