Telling the truth has become a revolutionary act, so let us salute those who disclose the necessary facts.
ALTERNATIVE NEWS
11 Mar 2016
Karen Straughan's Interview With Christian At #GGinTO
Dustin Hoffman: I’m A Jew - They All Survived For Me To Be Here
By Gilad Atzmon: What do you make out of this emotional episode? It reminded me why I decided to join the unchosen..
Thought Crimes In Feminist / Zionist Shill Trudeau’s Canada
By Davide Mastracci: The Liberal Party of Canada, which is led by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and came to power in October 2015, brands itself as a progressive alternative to the Conservatives. In some respects, they are: the Liberals have ended airstrikes in Syria, accepted more than 25,000 Syrian refugees and lifted sanctions on Iran.
When it comes to Israel and the Palestinian-led campaign for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS), however, the Liberals have continued down the Conservatives’ troubling path, violating Canadians’ wishes and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms along the way.
On 22 February the House of Commons passed a motion by an overwhelming margin of 229-51 votes in condemnation of the BDS movement.
The Liberals have a majority in the House of Commons and the motion, introduced by two Conservative members of parliament, would not have passed without them. Only two of 184 Liberal MPs voted against the motion.
When it comes to Israel and the Palestinian-led campaign for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS), however, the Liberals have continued down the Conservatives’ troubling path, violating Canadians’ wishes and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms along the way.
On 22 February the House of Commons passed a motion by an overwhelming margin of 229-51 votes in condemnation of the BDS movement.
The Liberals have a majority in the House of Commons and the motion, introduced by two Conservative members of parliament, would not have passed without them. Only two of 184 Liberal MPs voted against the motion.
The motion emphasizes the “friendship,” economic and diplomatic relations between Canada and Israel and claims that the BDS movement “promotes the demonization and delegitimization of the State of Israel.”
The Consuming Instinct And Female Hypergamy - Gad Saad
Obama To Push Passage Of Pro-Corporatist New World Order TPP Trade Deal Despite Rising Public Opposition
The United States is in the final stages of negotiating the Trans-Pacific-Partnership (TPP), a massive free-trade agreement with Mexico, Canada, Japan, Singapore and seven other countries. Who will benefit from the TPP? American workers? Consumers? Small businesses? Taxpayers? Or the biggest multinational corporations in the world?
One strong hint is buried in the fine print of the closely guarded draft. The provision, an increasingly common feature of trade agreements, is called “Investor-State Dispute Settlement,” or ISDS. The name may sound mild, but don’t be fooled. Agreeing to ISDS in this enormous new treaty would tilt the playing field in the United States further in favor of big multinational corporations. Worse, it would undermine U.S. sovereignty.
ISDS would allow foreign companies to challenge U.S. laws – and potentially to pick up huge payouts from taxpayers – without ever stepping foot in a U.S. court.
One strong hint is buried in the fine print of the closely guarded draft. The provision, an increasingly common feature of trade agreements, is called “Investor-State Dispute Settlement,” or ISDS. The name may sound mild, but don’t be fooled. Agreeing to ISDS in this enormous new treaty would tilt the playing field in the United States further in favor of big multinational corporations. Worse, it would undermine U.S. sovereignty.ISDS would allow foreign companies to challenge U.S. laws – and potentially to pick up huge payouts from taxpayers – without ever stepping foot in a U.S. court.
Black History
Three Basic Human Rights Men Gain From “Legal Abortion”
By Alice Smith: Recently the youth wing of Sweden’s Liberal Party has put forward an interesting proposition: that men should be granted the right to opt out of paternity via a “legal abortion”. However extreme and peculiar some of their other stances are, I cannot help but see the good this particular act would do if it made its way through international legal systems. How this would work is that men would be permitted to opt out of parenthood fully up to the eighteenth week of pregnancy, by current Swedish physical abortion laws. The man then severs all ties to the child, as though it were dead to him. (1) Cold and cruel? Maybe, but so is the physical act of killing an unborn child.
Sometimes people have no ability to raise a child and, where the opt-out is present for one sex, it is an injustice not to offer an equal option to the other. This proposal would give men and women almost equal grounds on which to decide parenthood and would open the way for men to regain three core human rights that they can be denied.
Right 1: The right to choose parenthood.
The Cairo Programme of Action states that:
Reproductive health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity, in all matters relating to the reproductive system and its functions and processes.
Sometimes people have no ability to raise a child and, where the opt-out is present for one sex, it is an injustice not to offer an equal option to the other. This proposal would give men and women almost equal grounds on which to decide parenthood and would open the way for men to regain three core human rights that they can be denied.Right 1: The right to choose parenthood.
The Cairo Programme of Action states that:
Reproductive health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity, in all matters relating to the reproductive system and its functions and processes.
Loss Of National Inheritance
CS MGTOW's Interview With Jolyon Jenkins On BBC Radio 4
CS MGTOW discusses his view of MGTOW Men Going Their Own Way with a smarmy mangina from the BBC.
10 Mar 2016
Syria Would Be Fully Under ISIS Control If Not For Russia - Serbian President
RT: Serbia’s president has praised Russian efforts in fighting terrorists in Syria, saying that if Moscow hadn’t intervened, the Middle Eastern country would have ceased to exist as a sovereign state. The statement comes in stark contrast to NATO’s assessment of the situation.
Tomislav Nikolic emphasized the need for Russian military involvement in Syria, stating that “If it [Russia] didn’t intervene, Syria would be a country of the so-called Islamic State [IS, ISIS/ISIL],” in an interview with TASS on Tuesday.The Serbian leader was quoted as saying that the Russian military is essential to protecting peace in Syria and countering the jihadist threat, which might spread globally and affect other countries, including Russia, if not contained at this stage.
“Russia should be in the military aspect involved in the protection of Syria at the request from Syria, as it would mean protection from terrorism, and it is much better to be protected from it in Syria than in Russia,” he added, pointing out that the strategy employed by the Russian government is in fact akin to that of the US, which on numerous occasions has used its forces to fight terror overseas.
Commenting on the breakthrough ceasefire deal brokered by Russia and the US, he called it “a very encouraging sign” and urged both parties to curb Turkey’s posture in the region, which he said was “the master” while “staying in the shadow.”
The US Neo-Con-Artists Do Not Want Peace In The World
Another Mass Killing - U.S. Slaughters 150 People In Somalia
Nobody Knows the Identity of the 150 People Killed by The U.S.A. in Somalia, but Most Are Certain They Deserved It
By Glenn Greenwald: The U.S. used drones and manned aircraft yesterday to drop bombs and missiles on Somalia, ending the lives of at least 150 people. As it virtually always does, the Obama administration instantly claimed that the people killed were “terrorists” and militants — members of the Somali group al Shabaab — but provided no evidence to support that assertion.
Nonetheless, most U.S. media reports contained nothing more than quotes from U.S. officials about what happened, conveyed uncritically and with no skepticism of their accuracy: The dead “fighters … were assembled for what American officials believe was a graduation ceremony and prelude to an imminent attack against American troops,” pronounced the New York Times. So, the official story goes, The Terrorists were that very moment “graduating” — receiving their Terrorist degrees — and about to attack U.S. troops when the U.S. killed them.
With that boilerplate set of claims in place, huge numbers of people today who have absolutely no idea who was killed are certain that they all deserved it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

