How Does The World Not Know The Truth About This

Bonobo3D: Sarah Clendenon and her husband travelled 700 miles the Social Justice Film Festival in Seattle to see the award winning documentary film, 'American Circumcision.' Following the screening Sarah discussed her awakening to the issue by a college professor who showed the class a brutal circumcision video, almost causing her to vomit in class.

19 November 2017: International Men's Day, London

Mike Buchanan: It starts early in the day, in Trafalgar Square, before most people arrived. We marched to the Royal Courts of Justice, the speakers on this video are Jordan Holbrook, then another man (can someone please let us know his name?), then Nigel Pankhurst.

An Open Letter To The Chair, Board Of Directors, White Ribbon Australia

Robert Brockway
President of Australian
Men’s Rights Association Inc.
Email: [Redacted]

Nicholas Cowdery AM QC
Chair, Board of Directors
White Ribbon Australia
Email: [Redacted] Mr Cowdery,
White Ribbon Australia bills itself as “preventing men’s violence against women.” Within this context much of the activity of White Ribbon Australia is focused on domestic violence (DV) and intimate partner violence (IPV). Taking this approach, while ignoring the larger picture of DV and IPV, disadvantages not just men who are victims of DV/IPV but women who are victims of DV/IPV as well.
Reciprocal IPV involves intimate partner violence in which each person in the relationship is both a perpetrator and victim of IPV. The Partner Abuse State of Knowledge (PASK) Project, the largest meta-analysis of DV/IPV research ever undertaken, shows that more than half of all IPV is reciprocal.[1]
The Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study found high rates of reciprocal IPV among study participants. The document “Findings About Partner Violence From the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study” released by the US National Institute of Justice found:

When the data were analyzed, victimized women were 10 times more likely to be perpetrators than other women and male perpetrators also were 19 times more likely to be victims than other men.”[2]

Giving Thanks... TO FEMINISM!

Raging Golden Eagle: You read that correctly. Feminism may have made women and traditionalist men much more miserable, but guys like me have benefited greatly from it! And the type of men feminists hate the most as well funny enough!

Urban Dictionary: Mangina

A Mangina is a self-depreciating man who subconsciously hates himself and blindly believes women are superior to him. He has been raised to think masculinity is inherently wrong - perhaps even a genetic/evolutionary/social flaw - and must be corrected by embracing his "feminine side" to the point of losing the very qualities that make him male. He believes women are beautiful, innocent angels and men are filthy animals who need to be controlled.

Manginas see women as the ultimate being and place them on a pedestal, focusing only on sex or the satisfaction of women all the while not giving a damn about his fellow man.

Manginas support women's issues which are against his fellow men. Someone who espouses feminism but is really being suckered into a form of chivalry in which women's interests take precedence over men's. Unaware that they are merely "useful idiots", doing what women want in the vain hope of getting laid. When his usefulness is over she tosses him out with the rest of the rubbish.

Manginas are betrayers and enemies of men

Black Friday = Planet Rape & Slavery

Deek Jackson

American Beauty: The Red Pilling Of Lester Burnham

Part one's been banned by copyright fascists

Paul Elam

The Truth Will Get You Into Trouble

'If Jews delve into their past in an attempt to understand its historicity, they may well gather that they are  repeating the exact mistakes in the present!'

By Gilad Atzmon: Perhaps in the goyim’s world, the truth will set you free, but in the Jewish Chronicle’s universe, the truth gets you into trouble. In the ghetto, the truth is at best an obstacle and at worst, a bitter enemy that must be suppressed. The Jewish Chronicle today reveals that an inquiry has been launched into the conduct of a truth telling teacher who had the audacity to present historical facts in the “presence of pupils.”
Apparently, Ethan Saunders, who teaches history and politics at Jewish Free School, “strongly defended” Ken Livingston’s truthful statements about Zionist collaboration with Nazis. Saunders’ statements came during a book launch for Dr. David Hirsh’s latest book, ‘Contemporary Left Antisemitism. 
Hirsh, an anti intellectual academic and a dedicated hasbara mouthpiece, complained to the JC: ‘“There were questions from students and then a teacher stood up at the back and, in a fairly kind of belligerent way, said: ‘I don’t agree with anything you said.’ He said that I hadn’t told the whole story to the students; it was a pretty clear allegation not only that I kind of got it wrong, but that I was speaking in bad faith.”

Russian Industry Should Be Ready For War - Putin

" ... the ability of the economy to rapidly increase defense production ... is one of the most important pillars in ensuring
the strategic safety of the country"  - V. Putin

By Louis Heyward: This is how a country which feels threatened behaves.
This is a very revealing Russian TV news report. Full transcript follows below. Just from the manner of the announcer, one can see he thinks this is very significant. It is the first story at the top of the hour.
The Russians are prepared to build extra capacity into many of their biggest civilian industrial companies, which serves no commercial purpose, but would allow them to rapidly increase military production if necessary - that would be mostly auto and aviation manufacturing, but also medicine and food supplies.

The goal is to upgrade manufacturing facilities and create a reserve of material and technical resources, a kind of inviolable reserve.

Putin is taking no chances with a plainly aggressive and hostile NATO, and US military establishment pushing war on several continents.

Transcript
Anchor:
Vesti live, we’re on the air. All large strategic companies in Russia regardless of their form of incorporation should be ready to increase their defense production output at anytime if required.

Women Underestimate Own Sexual Intention And Men Overestimate Women’s Sexual Intention

By Jordan Holbrook:  With all the recent furore around consent and the so-called ‘rape culture’, how many of these crossed wires and sexual/romantic faux pas are the fault of men? According to a recent study, men and women could be both held equally accountable for giving and reading into wrong signals, resulting in miscommunication and a touch on the knee or an attempt at a kiss when one isn’t wanted. These findings contradict the argument that it is men who overstep the boundary by assuming a woman is giving sexual signals when she is not.

Whilst it is true that it has been found men do predict a woman’s sexual intentions to be higher than what she later says her intentions actually were, it has previously been argued whether this occurs because men overestimate women’s intentions or because women underreport their intentions.

In the study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Professor Priya Raghubir, chair of the Marketing Department at NYU Stern School of Business, and former NYU Visiting Postdoctoral Scholar Isabelle Engeler, find a gap in how women and men interpret dating situations and intentions.

Across three experiments, they measured the ‘misprediction bias’ between men and women. In the first experiment, they assessed the overall size of the misprediction bias then they altered the order-of-elicitation of self- and other-reports to assess the impact of the order on self-awareness and honesty, which occurred in experiments two and three.

Interview With Brother Nathanael - Whose Side Are You On?

Brother Nathanael

UK Prisoners By Sex: The MoJ Report

By MRA-UK:

1. Introduction and Background

Well, well, what do we have here? A report from the MoJ itself on gender disparity in prison sentencing. I’ll get to that. First, a brief reprise.
It was in February 2014 I first wrote an article, on my older site, about men being treated more harshly than women by the judiciary in regard to imprisonment. In the process I discovered I was not the only one to have noticed. Philip Davies, MP for Shipley, had spoken about the matter in Parliament on 16^th October 2012 (2:30pm). I later posted a precis of the argument on this site on 21^st November 2014. It was to become the most visited article on this site (excluding the Home Page and “Introduction”).
I addressed various challenges to my (admittedly crude) analysis in this post which followed in March 2015. Later I presented an updated analysis, here, based on indictable offences only, which I now regard as more robust. Both the original analysis and the updated analysis were presented in a public talk held at UCL on 25^th February 2016 (see the Powerpoint slides or watch the video).
Then, on the 8^th July 2016 Philip Davies spoke again, at ICMI16, on the matter of the different treatment of men and women as regards prison sentencing.