"Why was Mossad's guilty Jewish paedophile Jeffrey Epstein who was actually involved in child sex trafficking NOT treated in the horrible way the innocent Tate Brothers are?"
Candace Owens: The Tate brothers get raided...again, Theo Von interviews Donald Trump, and Hollywood is still disturbed.
AI-driven content moderation is subtly shaping public opinion and political engagement...
Thus, users do not have a direct customer relationship with the platform. The network is not directly incentivised to “care” about the user before the advertiser. And no matter where you lie on the spectrum between “free speech absolutism” and “private entities have the right to censor any user”, with such low margins it is inevitable machine processing will have to be used to moderate posts and deal with the customer interface.
But it is a fact the customer processing and management capabilities Social Networks are now evolving is being utilised in a variety of ways beyond just moderation. And it is also true this automated processing is being done at scale and is now applied to every post every member makes. 68% of US voters are on Facebook. In the UK it’s 66% and France 73.2%. The figures are similar for every democratic nation in the West. So it is vitally important the applied rules should be politically neutral.
The power that exists within the ability to machine-process every users posts is far deeper and more profound than perhaps many realise. And while it can’t directly dictate what users write in their messages it has the capacity to fundamentally shape which messages gain traction.
Social Media services have become de-facto town squares and most would agree their corporate owners should avoid ever putting a hand on the scales and influencing politics.
Tucker Carlson with Bethany Hamilton
'This seems to have been an attempt to attack Russia's strategic nuclear capabilities!'
By Hal Turner: A Ukrainian "Kamikaze" plane, loaded with explosives, has been shot down by Russian Air Defenses over Murmansk, Russia, in the far north of the country.
Video below shows the plane and the shoot down.
Murmansk is approximately three-thousand kilometers from Ukraine; too far for any plane of this size and type to fly. So where did the plane come from? The only possibilities: Finland or Norway. The map below shows Murmansk with the Red Locator Pin:
If this aircraft can be shown to have originated in Finland, given Finland having just joined NATO, then this will have been an violation of Russian air space, by a hostile aircraft for an attack by NATO against Russia.
Cyrus Janssen: The Ukraine Invasion of Russia is major news, but what does it mean? Does Ukraine actually have a chance at victory? Or is this invasion an effort to drum up more support from Western countries? What will Putin do in response to this invasion? Also what will Trump or Kamala Harris do as President to end this war? We discuss all this and more today with Colonel Douglas Macgregor
...wars must be funded!
Authored by George F. Smith: The following is derived from a speech in my novel, The Flight of the Barbarous Relic
Wars must be funded, and for this governments functioning as states call upon the banking system for assistance.
Central Bank counterfeiting, which is another name for inflation, is the fuel that energizes the forces of war. Inflation, or counterfeiting, amounts to issuing receipts for something that doesn’t exist, which legally is the prerogative of the central bank. Calling such receipts money allows them to be created in massive amounts quickly. When the US Congress votes to send billions of fiat money to Ukraine, Israel or anywhere else, no one questions the nature of what is being sent because legal tender laws make it all copasetic.
Yet, we should know better.
As to the assumed authority of any assembly in making paper money, or paper of any kind, a legal tender, or in other language, a compulsive payment [Thomas Paine wrote in 1786], it is a most presumptuous attempt at arbitrary power. There can be no such power in a republican government: the people have no freedom, and property no security where this practice can be acted . . .
If anything had, or could have, a value equal to gold and silver, it would require no tender law: and if it had not that value it ought not to have such a law; and, therefore, all tender laws are tyrannical and unjust, and calculated to support fraud and oppression. [emphasis added]
'In debating what government should attempt, and how big it should be, let’s agree that its real size, its real cost, is what it spends, and keep that side of the ledger as clean and clear as humanly possible.'
_0.jpg)
I’m not sure when Friedman said it. But he died in 2006 aged 94, and the clip shows him in middle age, so it was around half a century back. We should have listened, because it has applied consistently since and still does.
In fact, I’d just read a column by my former colleague Randall Denley about an administration of ostensibly conservative inclinations touting its “prudent, responsible” fiscal management while “tracking a clear path” back to a balanced budget from its current massive scary deficit. As Denley added tartly, “As it turns out, tracking a balanced budget is like tracking a unicorn. The tracking is easy, but finding one is hard.”
"What is extreme misogyny? What ever the British government say it is. 'Anti-establishment rhetoric' and 'laughing at women's football' could earn you a visit from 'the terror police'. Thought criminals will take the place of real criminals."
Paul Joseph Watson