‘Six MPs in Amsterdam’ fingers The Monday Club
The Slog: The Exaro investigative
site this morning quotes sources inside the Met’s Fernbridge paedophile
operation as saying they’re following “new lines of enquiry” involving
six former Conservative Ministers who frequented Amsterdam’s paedophile
brothels during their time in office. One of these is a former Minister
who has been under suspicion for some time…and probably also the
protection of one or two embarrassed spooks and Sir Humphreys who were,
no doubt, blackmailing him about it at the time.
A senior detective is quoted as saying this time there will be no
cover-up, so he may well have booked himself a slot in the
upside-down-in-ditch position. We shall see: but the really interesting
thing here is that the mention of recreational trips to Amsterdam can
only mean one Tory ginger group: the infamous but now defunct Right Wing
Monday Club.
Last March, The Slog posted a lengthy piece pointing
the finger at seven former members, some of whom were also implicated
in Monday Club circulars talking of trips to Amsterdam. One former
Clubber was the quiet former Tory Wet Peter Bottomley, whose politics
are light years away from the Club, and yet bizarrely he was a
member….
his own Wikipedia entry indeed confirms this: ‘He was for some
years a member of the Conservative Monday Club despite disagreeing with
their policies on immigration, race relations, Rhodesia and South
Africa.’ So one is left wondering what he had in common with them. Or
not, as the case may be.
His wife is of course Baroness Nettlehead Fruntbotham, currently the spokesman for profiteering sawbones
private health concerns in the House of Lords. Despite constant denials
by both parties, she and Jeremy Hunt are related. In an interesting
move, Hunt’s Wikipedia entry has been amended to say they are “related
by marriage”, but it’s not by his as Mrs Hunt is Chinese. So it must be
by hers to….Peter Bottomley. As far as the family tree attests, they
seem to share an uncle somewhere up the line. Anyway, endlessly denied –
but now admitted. You read it here first.
Those who imagine, by the way, that it’s just a few pols who don’t
want all this diahorrea leaking from the cess tank are being extremely
naive: a great deal of the control exercised by the security services
and Whitehall over Westminster is base on detailed knowledge of corpse
burial locations, and skeletons behind firmly closed cupboard doors.
There are many reasons for one to not just suppose this but know it
to be absolutely true. One such is being told about it after a few
glasses of peppery Côte D’Or reds by folks as disparate as retiring
Ministers, COI officials, and spooks themselves. Others include the
seeming immunity of the MoD or FCO from attacks of any nature, another
is the illegal pensions all the top Sir Humphreys awarded themselves
after 2005. The simple fact is that MPs screw up – and around. There is
no escaping the little Black Book.
This might also explain a well-hidden statistic just released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) about cuts in the Civil Service.
‘In the year to 31 March 2013 Civil Service employment decreased by
around 3 per cent. Just under 449,000 people worked in the Civil Service
in March 2013.The decrease in Civil Service Employment consisted mainly
of full-time staff’, says the overview. Excellent: 100,000 less of the
buggers than there were two years ago, and they were all fulltime, not 2
day a week tea ladies. Progress at last.
Um, except for this little gem concerning the seven grades of
nincompoop there are in Whitehall. The Top Wallies at Grades 6 and 7, in
terms of pay and pension liability, account for just short of £3 in 5.
And guess what? ‘Since March 2012 headcount at Grades 6 and 7 increased by 4 per cent.
Employee numbers at all other responsibility levels showed a decrease.
The largest decrease was at the Administrative responsibility level
(Administrative Officers and Assistants) with a fall of 6 per cent.
Fewer chaps down below? Excellent! All the more for us here on the Bridge. Now then, iceberg? What iceberg?
No comments:
Post a Comment