By Mike Buchanan: From time to time I put myself through the pain of reading titles such as the Guardian and Independent. As a matter of principle I read library copies, rather than buying them. The Independent, once a fine newspaper, becomes ever worse. From the Editorial of today’s edition of the paper:
Yvette Cooper is campaigning to become the Labour Party’s first woman leader on a platform of putting families back ‘at the heart’ of party policy, first by extending free childcare to children aged two, so that more parents can go back to work.
The doublespeak here is astonishing, but it reminds us why she won a
‘Gormless Feminist of the Month’ award. She equates putting families
back at the heart of party policy, with incentivising ‘more parents’
into paid employment. By ‘more parents’ she largely means ‘more
mothers’, of course, regardless of whether they want to engage in paid
work when their children are so young.
Who will foot the enormous bill of extending yet further taxpayers’
funding of childcare? Mainly working men, of course, who already pay 72%
of the income taxes collected in the UK. Many of the working men paying
for this extra childcare will simultaneously be denied access to their
own children – denied by the family courts, which will not deal robustly
with the malicious mothers who are the cause of the problem, abusing
both ex-partners and their own children.
William Gruff says: The insidiousness of social welfare is
that men, who pay almost three times as much personal tax as women, are
denied the right to choose not to bring up children, since they are
compelled to pay for children that are not theirs. In that sense,
childcare funded from the preponderantly male public purse is akin to
paternity fraud.
epistemol says: Adam Kostakis in his excellent series of lectures ‘Gynocentrism Theory’ tells us that feminism is;
(1) The expropriation of resources from men to women.
(2) The punishment of men.
(3) To increase (1) and (2) in terms of scope and intensity indefinitely.
This would certainly tie in with Williams comment above.
(2) The punishment of men.
(3) To increase (1) and (2) in terms of scope and intensity indefinitely.
This would certainly tie in with Williams comment above.
Mike Buchanan says: Agreed. Feminists’ greed and sadism is insatiable.
nrjnigel says: Quite. It is important that J4MB
continually reminds the public of who pays the taxes that are so freely
spent. On Mrs. Balls – it is interesting to note that here in the north
UKIP made huge inroads into the Labour vote. In fact if one looks at the
votes cast the “right” won. One wonders if Labour continues to push
their trendy agenda of modern isms it may alienate it’s vote, which
tends to the socially conservative.Source
_______
Who Funds Engender, The Scottish Radical Feminist Campaigning Organisation?
By Mike Buchanan: On Friday I emailed Emma Ritch, the Chief Executive of Engender, a
Scottish radical feminist campaigning organisation, asking her to direct
me towards ‘lots of evidence’ she claims exists, showing that
increasing female representation on corporate boards leads to enhanced
corporate performance. If our previous experiences of challenging
radical feminists are anything to go by, she won’t be responding by the
deadline of 5pm on Friday 29 May, after which we’ll present her with our
‘Lying Feminist of the Month’ award.A supporter has emailed me to ask if I know anything about how Engender is funded. A Google search soon led me to their 2013/14 annual report. Their funding and outgoings are broken down on p7. Of their £237,927 income, the Scottish government provided £120,000, a little over half. At the other end of the scale, the smallest source of income was donations, at £783 (0.3% of the total).
It’s a familiar pattern. Feminist-run organisations are often parasites on taxpayers, although almost three-quarters of the income tax collected in the UK is paid by men. Radical feminist ‘academics’ running Gender Studies courses are parasites too, and would surely otherwise be unemployable.
British men are funding the women (and sometimes men) who assault their interests, the people who lie relentlessly about domestic violence, rape, and so much else, decade after decade. And yet the mainstream media never expose them as the lying hate-driven people they are. With rare exceptions academics don’t expose them either, even anonymously. Source