By Mike Buchanan [J4MB]: A female Telegraph
journalist reports on some insane witterings from a taxpayer-funded
female academic who’d be unemployed if the world were a fairer place. I
couldn’t get beyond the first two paragraphs, in the interests of
maintaining what’s left of my mental composure:
School boys should be encouraged to take part in cheerleading and other traditional female pursuits to promote gender equality in sport, an academic has said.
Amy Pressland, a lecturer in education at the University of East Anglia (UEA), argued that PE classes should be mixed-sex to promote better gender relations, not only in society, but in business as well.I think ideologically-driven idiots like Amy Pressland should be fired, to promote higher standards in universities.
If this pig is so interested in promoting gender equality then why doesn't she encourage boys to go to college?? Most colleges are predominately female. Could it be because Pressland is a feminist halfwit that is against the education of men?
ReplyDelete'Pressland', what an appropriate name for a person endorsed here by what I like to call the lame-stream media. Your statement seems undisputed, even by feminists, that from around 60% of the student population 40 years ago, which does not seem at all lopsided bearing in mind studies that show men are so much more work centric to a figure today that is falling down past 35% at a dramatic pace.
DeleteFeminism does seem to make halfwits out of even the most intelligent people. They follow the lame-stream narrative and it seems natural to them that of course we should advocate for equality without question and of course they end up hoisted with their own petard. I have a cousin Anna M Agathangelou who is currently a Visiting Research Fellow at Harvard, a highly intelligent woman who's mind is as sharp as you like, but when it comes the feminism it all falls apart for her and when we debate I am left thinking she is little more than a second rate hack. She is not by any means, but feminism definitely blinds her. Indeed last summer she and two of her fellow lecturers could do little more than look at each other for support and giggle occasionally at fallacious axioms as their platitudes were disintegrated one by one. One can lose all ones former friends and family very quickly in trying to feed them that red pill.
I postulate that we are so immersed in it that even the most intelligent become infected. For the female faculty I think they need it, they need to believe it because otherwise it would be apparent to them that indeed women preside in the middle ground and men are at each end of the spectrum and therefore their peers in highest level academia are invariably superior. They need the religion of feminism to justify their very existence and their male peers must be chivalrous lest they be marked as misogynistic.