"Dishonour and ruthlessness still run in the British royal family!"
2nacheki: Buckingham Palace has declined an official request to return the remains of an Ethiopian prince who they kidnapped and held hostage for several years and then buried at Windsor Castle in the 19th Century.
Sounds like Charles the philanderer can't return the Ethiopian prince, because his despotic family disposed of the prince's body back in the day and there is now no body available to return. The statement that it might offend or disturb others rings hollow and is merely a poor excuse and attempt to avoid the truth of their barbarity and ill deserved superiority complex being laid bare for all to see.
ReplyDeleteThere is already a large republican movement in Britain that wishes to abolish the monarchy, this would add more fuel to the republican cause.
It usually does run in the family, like the murderous former queen, her son the paedophile Andrew, and the royal philanderers, so could a fellow necrophiliac royal be rather attached to the Ethiopian prince and is that why they refuse to return the body to his people?
ReplyDeleteThis idea posited by king philanderer that others would be upset more than the dead Ethiopian princes kin just doesn't sit well with me and as long as Charlie baby refuses to return the African prince to his people we are bound to continue to attempt to connect the dots, right, or wrong and consider, murderers, kidnappers, philanderers, paedophiles, ...necrophiliacs?
Yep, it has to be one, or the other, given the philanderer's response, either they dumped the prince's body in the trash and there's no body to return, or he and Mrs HRH philanderer have their own real live Ethiopian sex doll and role playing colonialism really gets their juices flowing... Sounds more plausible than the flimsy excuse we've been given so far.