Early in 2011, the London Bullion Market Association began to push for
gold to be recognised by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision as
the ultimate high-quality liquid asset. It has been a planned approach
involving the wider financial community, with the European Parliament
voting unanimously to recommend that central counterparties (basically
regulated settlement intermediaries for securities markets) accept gold
as collateral under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation
(EMIR). Lobbying by the LBMA certainly contributed to this favourable
outcome. A growing acceptance of gold as collateral in regulated markets
is forcing the Basel Committee to reconsider the position of gold as a
banking asset, which currently has a 50% valuation haircut. It is now a
racing certainty the haircut will be revised to zero, the same status as
secure cash.
This is an important development for the physical gold market, and
early warning of the change was signalled by a consultation document
issued by the Fed and banking regulators in the light of forthcoming
Basel 3 regulations1. It must have stuck in the Fed’s craw to have to circulate a proposal that “A
bank holding company or savings and loan holding company may assign a
risk-weighted asset amount of zero to cash owned and held in all offices
of subsidiary depository institutions or in transit; and for gold
bullion held in a subsidiary depository institution’s own vaults, or
held in another depository institution’s vaults on an allocated basis,
to the extent the gold bullion assets are offset by gold bullion
liabilities.”(Page 291 and elsewhere).
There can be little doubt if history is any guide that the US Treasury
and the Fed would rather not give gold a status that rivals the dollar,
but they cannot boss the Basel Committee around.