According to the manifesto, it isn’t even technically about women’s rights, or even reproductive rights—its an “intersectional” movement that bleeds over into all aspects of social justice.
Telling the truth has become a revolutionary act, so let us salute those who disclose the necessary facts.
ALTERNATIVE NEWS
8 Feb 2017
So-Called Feminist MPs Ignore Scourge Of Muslim Sharia Courts And Judaic Metzitzah B'peh MGM Culture
'Philip's key point is about feminist MPs not being willing to challenge religious lobbies, but the same is true of ALL MPs and peers with respect to MGM.'
By Philip Davies MP: It has happened pretty quickly – just week three on the Women and Equalities Committee and I have seen what a pathetic sham the self-styled feminists in Parliament really are.
If it was funny, you would have to laugh; but actually I found it utterly disgusting and depressing.
So what do our usual suspect vocal feminists in Parliament do when women’s basic rights are in competition with another of their politically correct shibboleths? The answer is absolutely nothing.The wonderful Crossbench Peer and Human Rights campaigner, Baroness Cox, has introduced a bill which would ban Sharia Councils from making decisions in the UK.
In advance of its second reading she held a meeting for all Parliamentarians to hear from three Muslim women their harrowing stories of how they had been treated by Sharia Councils in the UK, and how the UK courts were respecting the decisions made by them.
These extremely brave women told us how they were forced into marriage at gunpoint, how they were betrothed to men from Pakistan simply so they could move to the UK, how their husbands refused to touch them if they went to university because that made them dirty – and how men could divorce women simply by saying “I divorce you” three times, but women have nothing like the same rights.
Audi Super Bowl Commercial Pushes Feminism
Moral Supremacy And Mr. Putin
By Patrick J. Buchanan: Is Donald Trump to be allowed to craft a foreign policy based on the ideas on
which he ran and won the presidency in 2016?
Our foreign policy elite’s answer appears to be a thunderous no.
Case in point: U.S. relations with Russia.
During the campaign Trump was clear. He would seek closer ties with Russia and cooperate with Vladimir Putin in smashing al-Qaida and ISIS terrorists in Syria, and leave Putin’s ally Bashar Assad alone.
With this diplomatic deal in mind, President Trump has resisted efforts to get him to call Putin a "thug" or a "murderer."
Asked during his taped Super Bowl interview with Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly whether he respected Putin, Trump said that, as a leader, yes.
O’Reilly pressed, "But he’s a killer, though. Putin’s a killer."
To which Trump replied, "There are a lot of killers. We’ve got a lot of killers.
What, do you think our country’s so innocent?"
While his reply was clumsy, Trump’s intent was commendable.
Our foreign policy elite’s answer appears to be a thunderous no.
Case in point: U.S. relations with Russia.
During the campaign Trump was clear. He would seek closer ties with Russia and cooperate with Vladimir Putin in smashing al-Qaida and ISIS terrorists in Syria, and leave Putin’s ally Bashar Assad alone.
With this diplomatic deal in mind, President Trump has resisted efforts to get him to call Putin a "thug" or a "murderer."
Asked during his taped Super Bowl interview with Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly whether he respected Putin, Trump said that, as a leader, yes.
O’Reilly pressed, "But he’s a killer, though. Putin’s a killer."
To which Trump replied, "There are a lot of killers. We’ve got a lot of killers.
What, do you think our country’s so innocent?"
While his reply was clumsy, Trump’s intent was commendable.
The Past, Present And Future Of Goldman Sachs - Nomi Prins
College Professor Exposes Women’s March On Washington
Feminists Want Women To Stop Having Sex, Doing Chores, Because Trump
'Women who are witholding sex from their partners may need to provide them with a full bullet point “cheat sheet” so they know exactly what’s at stake.'
By Emily Zanotti: Feminists and women’s rights activists have announced the follow up to the Women’s March on Washington: a “Women’s Strike” planned for March 8th, where women who oppose Donald Trump’s “misogynistic, homophobic, transphobic and racist policies” will stop doing chores, attending work, and even having sex with their partners in a show of how much women matter.The idea, which took eight feminists to come up with, is that men and other assorted non-gendered partners should be made to feel what will happen when women become so oppressed that they disappear.
The strike, they say, is not just about Donald Trump, but about all men—and even collaborating women—who are contributing to the swift decline of women’s rights worldwide. “While Trump’s blatant misogyny was the immediate trigger for the huge response on 21 January, the attack on women (and all working people) long predates his administration.”
Mangina Of The Year Awards 2016: We Have A Winner!
Topsy–Turvy World
Bianco Footwear Advert Glorifies Violence Against Men
Via Tony Stott, J4MB: A video (1:36) on the Facebook page of Bianco Footwear. Scroll down to the piece posted 23 January, ‘Equal Pay is Not Enough (#WomenNeedMore)’. It’s had over 2.6 million views in the space of two weeks, presumably overwhelmingly among women, who will have learned that if they’re not happy about something (however fictitious – the feminist gender pay gap narrative, in this case) it’s the fault of men, so it’s perfectly OK to smash a mug into a man’s face. The full idiotic narrative is here:
Listen up! There’s still not equal pay for equal work anywhere in the world.
And it seems most women are not even angry about it. But we should be. So let’s set a new goal.
From now on, equal pay is no longer enough.
Because women need more.
Our haircuts are more expensive.
Our underwear is ridiculously more expensive.
It’s simply more expensive to be a woman than to be a man!
Should we seriously get paid less than someone who applies body lotion to his face? [Eh?]
He doesn’t need a new outfit for every new occasion. [Ah, needs and wants. So easy to confuse the two…]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)