By Mike Buchanan: In our [J4MB]general election manifesto we explored two forms of paternity fraud (pp 52-54): – leading a man to believe he’s the biological father of a child, when he’s not. A crime under the Fraud Act (2006) for which the state never prosecutes the woman concerned. Men have to take out civil actions – not many could afford to do so – and cannot get financial compensation for the expense they incurred whilst unwittingly supporting children who were not theirs. At the most they might get compensation for emotional suffering, invariably under £20,000, usually under £10,000
– frustrating a contraceptive method in order to become pregnant – most commonly, a woman ‘forgetting’ to take the daily contraceptive pill Our manifesto proposals in this area: 1. The government should introduce compulsory paternity testing for all new-born babies, and both parents should be informed of the result of the tests (verbally and in writing) within a week of the babies’ births. If a man is not the biological father of a baby, he should be informed of the fact in the course of a face-to-face meeting with a health professional, and sign a document confirming he’s been made aware of his non-paternity of the child in question. 2. The state should only require a man to have financial responsibility for a child if he’s previously signed a legal declaration that he’s willing to support a child who results from the sexual relationship in question, and a paternity test has proven him to be the child’s biological father.
By Steve Brulé:This video series will air every Thursday, featuring professor, and anti-feminist, Janice Fiamengo commenting on contemporary culture. Janice Fiamengo is an outspoken critic of academic feminism, censorship and gender bias, and she is an ardent supporter of freedom of speech. Janice is an English professor at the University of Ottawa, and this series captures her thoughts on contemporary culture, and the destructive influence of feminism. Source
By Michael Krieger: Oh ISIS. The latest existential enemy that we are supposed to relinquish all of our civil liberties in order to battle. The terror group that has everyone so afraid, yet no one asks where they came from, and why their ranks continue to grow. We have asked those questions, and the clear answer is that ISIS arose out of the chaotic power vacuum created by the U.S. government’s unprovoked war in Iraq. But it’s worse than that. Far worse. Some of the biggest funders of ISIS from the very beginning, were represented by America’s Middle East “allies.” This is something I highlighted last year in the post: America’s Disastrous Foreign Policy – My Thoughts on Iraq. Here’s an excerpt:
But in the years they were getting started, a key component of ISIS’s support came from wealthy individuals in the Arab Gulf States of Kuwait, Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Sometimes the support came with the tacit nod of approval from those regimes; often, it took advantage of poor money laundering protections in those states, according to officials, experts, and leaders of the Syrian opposition, which is fighting ISIS as well as the regime. “Everybody knows the money is going through Kuwait and that it’s coming from the Arab Gulf,” said Andrew Tabler, senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Studies.
Reported by Gilad Atzmon:Commentators
on modern Jewish history are often puzzled by the animosity of secular
Jews toward gentiles. Particularly puzzling is the scale of Jewish
‘revolutionary’ violence towards Christianity and churches in
particular. It is no secret that Bolshevism set many churches ablaze.
The International Brigade followed a similar pattern in Spain (1936). It
is an established fact that Yiddish was the lingua franca of
the International Brigade that was formed following a tidal wave of
Church burning by the Republicans. That act of barbarism didn’t seem to
deter the salt of the Jewish Left who rushed to liberate Spain in the
name of the ‘International’. And yet, historically, this kind of
barbaric act was never associated with rabbinical Judaism.
Apparently,
this is not the case anymore.In the Jewish State, Orthodox Jews do
burn churches and they do it in the name of the Torah and in accordance
with their interpretation of the Jewish religion. In an unusually brave
article, Ynet revealed yesterday
that, Bentzi Gophstein, the head of Lehave, an Orthodox Jewish
organisation dedicated to preventing assimilation in the Holy Land, said
that he unquestionably supports burning churches and'houses of
idolatry.' Gophstein further stated that church burning is a legitimate
act under Jewish law. The right wing activist made the statement during a
summer seminar in Jerusalem.
Submitted by Tyler Durden:Deflecting criticism surrounding Ankara’s anti-terror air campaign, Turkey’s foreign minister Mevlut Cavusoglu last week told state television that strikes against ISIS targets would pick up once the US had its resources in place at Incirlik which will supposedly serve as a hub for a new "comprehensive battle." Turkey has had a difficult time explaining why, after obtaining NATO support for a new offensive campaign to root out "terrorists", its efforts have concentrated almost solely on the PKK and not on ISIS. As we’ve discussed in great detail (here, here, and here), and as the entire world is now acutely aware, Ankara’s newfound zeal for eradicating ISIS is nothing more than a cover for its efforts to undermine support for the PKK ahead of snap elections where President Tayyip Erdogan hopes to win back AKP’s absolute majority in parliament which it lost last month for the first time in 12 years. Cavusoglu was effectively suggesting that the reason it appears as though Ankara is overwhelmingly targeting the PKK at the possible expense of efforts to weaken ISIS is because Turkey must wait for the US to show up first, at which point the "real" fight will begin with the possible assistance of Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Qatar. In the meantime, the country is descending into civil war and for many Kurds, the frontlines are all too familiar.
SyrianGirlpartisan: The Cuckservative meme, what does it mean? Many news outlets have jumped the gun, calling it a far-right label, but this video examines its true meaning according to those who us it.
