By Gilad Atzmon: If you want to grasp the level of contempt American ‘progressive’ Jews hold towards their host nation all you have to do is subscribe to the Forward. Jay Michaelson, a contributing editor for the kosher outlet, proclaims that Donald Trump is the candidate of “the losers.” The fact that progressive Jews don’t like goyim, especially when they appear in white, is not new, but Michaelson takes Jewish bigotry to a new level. “As is now well known,” Michelson writes, Trump’s “core supporters are white, undereducated men who have been left behind by technology, globalization and the attendant erosion of America’s manufacturing base. Moreover, their days of white supremacy are coming to a close, and they’re mad as hell about it.” Why does it seem natural for a Jew to label about half of the American people as ‘white supremacist’ i.e., rabid racists. In case you failed to get the message, the Jewish writer reiterates for you: “Trump’s supporters are the losers of the new economy on the one hand, and of multiculturalism on the other.” Trump supporters, pretty much like Bernie Sanders’s betrayed followers, have one thing in common: they crave a radical change. They long for a productive America, a country with a prospect of hope and a future.
Raging Golden Eagle: It seems that ready access to porn has done more to stop people from having sex than abstinence based sexual education ever did. Big surprise, you overexpose someone to something, and it stops being nearly as interesting!
Mike Buchanan: When I first went to Speakers' Corner, a member of The London Group warned me to look out for 'a belligerent little bugger, with a beard and a beer', who they'd nicknamed 'Rupert the Beer'. Last Sunday he kindly outlined his views on the legal position of MGM.
Stefan Molyneux says we 'hate jews' because they are 'intelligent.' This is how 'shills' like Molyneux always try to frame the debate. No, we hate their criminal and immoral behavior. The banking scams the Federal Reserve undertakes, and usury banksters perpetuate, in general, should be illegal -- period. - Stefan Molyneux is an Irish-born Canadian blogger. Molyneux's areas of interest include anarcho-capitalism, atheism, secular ethics, right-libertarianism, cryptocurrencies, and familial relationships. He is a self-published author and has spoken at libertarian conferences and on podcasts. Molyneux formerly worked in the software industry.
Cheeky Bastard: What is disturbing is the complacency and the complacency of men to degenerate into victims even in your own demise. People will talk about it, make fun about it and some even creep out as watching a dark web horror flick. It is so scary that people are prepared to sit and watch the stupidity of others and make fun of it as if it is doing no damage to our society, a way of life, the future of our children and the speed in which things can so drastically change of the worst.
By John Pilger:The exoneration of a man accused of the worst of crimes, genocide, made no headlines. Neither the BBC nor CNN covered it. The Guardian allowed a brief commentary. Such a rare official admission was buried or suppressed, understandably. It would explain too much about how the rulers of the world rule.
The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) has quietly cleared the late Serbian president, Slobodan Milosevic, of war crimes committed during the 1992-95 Bosnian war, including the massacre at Srebrenica. Far from conspiring with the convicted Bosnian-Serb leader Radovan Karadzic, Milosevic actually “condemned ethnic cleansing”, opposed Karadzic and tried to stop the war that dismembered Yugoslavia. Buried near the end of a 2,590-page judgement on Karadzic last February, this truth further demolishes the propaganda that justified Nato’s illegal onslaught on Serbia in 1999. Milosevic died of a heart attack in 2006, alone in his cell in The Hague, during what amounted to a bogus trial by an American-invented “international tribunal”. Denied heart surgery that might have saved his life, his condition worsened and was monitored and kept secret by US officials, as WikiLeaks has since revealed.
"I was coming out of the longest and last relationshit of my life. I felt like everything I did around her had to be done according to her explicit specifications and if it wasn't I was in trouble. By the end I started seeing the world in her eyes and was always afraid of displeasing her. Do you think that this was a form of mental abuse she put me through? Did she intentionally make me afraid to be myself? Because it certainly felt that way and I can't shake the feeling. I'm a free man and can do as I please. Cheers!" - I think the term you're looking for is walking on eggshells. Women have this uncanny ability to make us afraid of displeasing them.
Why does it seem natural for a Jew to label about half of the American people as ‘white supremacist’ i.e., rabid racists.