What Should Be Done To Curb Big Tech?

When every single major tech company is making the exact same decision over who to deplatform and what to ban, doesn’t that seem like the behavior of a cartel? Why should a handful of Jewish billionaires have the power to decide who may have free speech?

Authored by Bari Weiss: Do your eyes gloss over when you see the words “Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act”? Mine do.

Yet the subject of Big Tech’s might — Should Facebook have the power to ban a president? Should Amazon have the power to ban the sale of a controversial book? Should Twitter have the power to permanently bar a user over a single tweet? And if not, what should the government be doing about it? — is both fascinating and incredibly important. 

Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas

I don’t think there is a group left in America who is happy about the power that companies like Facebook and Twitter and Google have arrogated to themselves. According to a recent poll from Vox and Data for Progress, 59% of Democrats and 70% of Republicans think Big Tech’s economic power is a problem. It’s hard to think of another issue with that kind of bipartisan consensus.

Bill Gates Backs Project To 'Dim The Sun' So That He Can Sell Us More Vaccines - Tucker Carlson Reacts

FN:

'Apocalypse Never' author Michael Shellenberger calls idea 'terrible' on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.'

The "War On Cash" Is Really A War On Your Freedom

Dr. Ron Paul: "Vaccine Passports"? ... "War on Cash,"? ... The common thread is that these authoritarian ideas are war on our freedom. Total surveillance has been sought by authoritarians for thousands of years; always with the goal of trying to control how people move, or how they spend their money. The spread of the ideas of Liberty are necessary in order to save us from encroaching tyranny.

Even The Danish Government Knows Smart Men Won't Date Feminist Women

Better Bachelor: What a fail. Rather than stop the women's behavior, the Denmark Government is trying to bribe guys.

“Regime” And “CCP”: Propaganda Tools For Dissociating A Targeted Nation From Its Government

'...To facilitate the agendas of a ruling class of sociopaths who operate the most deadly and destructive power structure on the face of the earth [The Jews' vassal USA].'

By Caitlin Johnstone: Have you ever seen a mainstream news report containing the phrase “the French regime”? How about  “the British regime” or “the Australian regime”?

If these phrases look a bit odd, it’s because you’ve never seen them written down before. Ostensibly the word simply means “a form of government” or “a government in power”, but it’s generally understood that it’s got a kind of negative connotation to it just because of the way it tends to be used. In theory its meaning is closer to “a bad or authoritarian government”, and in practice by the western media it means “a government which disobeys the dictates of Washington”.

Just look at some recent examples of the way that word has been used in headlines by the mass media:

The REAL Holocaust: The 1915 Christian Armenian Genocide And Its Jewish Russophobic Origins

"As a result of the Jewish lobby's recommendations, the Young Turks government removed Armenians from Anatolia in 1915. Hence, the economy of the country was left in the hands of Jewish capital." - Ekrem Buğra Ekinci of The Daily Sabah Turkish newspaper, October 13th 2017.

Johann von Bernstorff (German ambassador); "The way the Armenian problem was solved was hair-raising. I can still see in front of me Talaat's cynical expression, when he emphasized that the Armenian question was solved."1

Einar af Wirsén (Swedish Diplomat) "When I kept on pestering him about the Armenian question, he once said with a smile: 'What on earth do you want? The question is settled, there are no more Armenians'".2