By Charles Hugh Smith: A system that suppresses dissent is fault-intolerant, ignorant and fragile. Increasing centralization has been viewed as the solution for all social and economic problems for quite some time. The Eurozone project is one recent manifestation of this belief.
The basis of this belief is rationality and efficiency. If we centralize production and decision-making, we eliminate all sorts of inefficiencies. Decisions can be made by "top people," and supply chains can be rationalized from a hopelessly inefficient clutter down to a supremely rational and cost-effective pathway.
Ironically, in eliminating inefficiency and messy decision-making, centralization eliminates redundancy, decentralized pathways of response and dissent. Once you lose redundancy and all the feedback it represents, you lose resiliency and fault-tolerance. The centralized system is fault-intolerant and fragile.
By rationalizing decision-making and authority in a centralized
hierarchy, the system slowly but surely eliminates dissent: those who
"don't get on board" and "get with the program" imposed from the top are
marginalized, pushed out or liquidated.
From the point of view of the "top people," this is merely rational; why
tolerate a lot of chatter and resistance that doesn't serve any real
purpose except to bog down the duly chosen program?
As Nassim Taleb has observed, dissent is information. Eliminate
or marginalize dissent and you've deprived the system of critical
information. Lacking a wealth of information, the system becomes a
monoculture in which the leadership is free to pursue confirmation bias,
focusing on whatever feedback confirms its policy mandates.
A system that suppresses dissent is fault-intolerant, ignorant and fragile. Any
event that does not respond to centralized, rationalized policy creates
unintended consequences that throws the centralized mechanism into
disarray. Lacking dissent and redundancy, the system piles on one
haphazard, politically expedient "fix" after another, further
destabilizing the system.
The event that triggers crisis and collapse isn't important; the system,
rendered unstable and fragile by centralization, is primed for crisis
and collapse. The dry underbrush is piled high, and if the first
lightning strike doesn't start the fire, the second one will. With
dissent and the inefficiencies of redundancy and decentralized pathways
of response gone, there is nothing left to stop a conflagration that
consumes the entire forest.
No comments:
Post a Comment