"...Despite the
increased investment in treatment, the majority of government spending on
responding to illegal drugs is still devoted to enforcing drug laws. It is
however difficult to estimate government expenditure on drug policy, as it is
not transparently reported. From the available data, we calculate that in the
UK, as in other nations, enforcement expenditure (including police, courts and
prisons) accounts for most of the total expenditure on drug policy..."
A
report launched by LSE and Release today (22nd August 2013), shows that
drug policing is dominating stop and search, that much of this activity
is focused on low level drug possession offences, and that black and Asian people are being disproportionately targeted.
http://www.ukdpc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Policy%20report
"...An analysis of UK Drug Policy..." Peter Reuter and Alex Stephens.
2008.
Niamh Eastwood,
Executive Director of Release and co-author of the report, states “...this
research shows that stop and search is not about finding guns or knives but
about the police going out and actively looking for people who are in
possession of a small amount of drugs, mainly cannabis...".
http://www.release.org.uk/publications/numbers-black-and-white-ethnic-disparities-policing-and-prosecution-drug-offences
http://www.release.org.uk/publications/numbers-black-and-white-ethnic-disparities-policing-and-prosecution-drug-offences
This is a truly
worrying statistic, it is alarming and disgusting at the same time. It proves
once and for all that policing in our country has become primarily an issue of determinable
statistics; policing is now so heavily politicised, that the Government insists
on demanding measurable metrics, by which to judge whether their policies are
effective or not. The Home Office presumes that statistics such as these show
that the police are doing their job effectively.
What they don't
realise is that, in reality, these statistics manage to prove that Government
law enforcement policies are a virtual complete failure because the vast
majority of police time is spent looking for small amounts of drugs, in the
possession of people who have them for their personal use, while the vast
percentage of real recidivist crime, theft, robbery, theft of and from motor
vehicles, and burglary in particular, goes virtually undetected!
What it means is
that the police are not looking to prevent crime as a whole, but just to get a
quick statistic, a cynical practice which is undermining the whole purpose of
British-style policing.
This is proving that
the original purpose of uniformed street policing as foreseen by Sir Robert
Peel and implemented by the first Commissioners, has been wholly subverted by a
bizarre political demand for meaningless statistics.
Proper policing
cannot be measured and it is pointless (and dangerous) to try. There is no
metric that can measure or value the worth of the visible presence of the
uniformed constable on the street, walking the beat and interacting with the
public in the community, and keeping the Queen's Peace.
The sense of public
safety and community well-being that the very presence of the uniformed
constable walking on the High Street, talking to passers-by, engaging with
shop-keepers, or joking with stall holders instils in the mind of the
law-abiding public is tangible and real, but it cannot be measured. Yet it is
the fundamental purpose for beat policing.
The only problem for
a modern Government is that it cannot be measured, and in today's society, if
it can't be measured, it doesn't exist!
The original
function of police was to prevent crime. That was why they were given certain
powers to stop and search persons and vehicles. These were general powers which
the police had to be able to justify using when they were applied. They were
very specific 'crime-preventative' powers.
Providing a power to
stop and search individuals under the Misuse of Drugs legislation has a
different function altogether, and was aimed at legitimating the act of
stopping the person and facilitating the arrest of offenders. They cannot be
claimed to be used to prevent crime, because the crime has already been
committed. However, it was never intended that the powers to search would ever
be used in this way.
Examine the figures.
Over 50% of stop and
searches made on the street are for drugs, 10% are for offensive weapons and
less than 1% are for guns .
The police in
England and Wales stop and search someone for drugs every 58 seconds.
These are not proper
stops made to assist in keeping the peace and preventing crime. These are 'line
of least resistance' stops designed solely to keep the figures up to keep the
Home Office happy!
Of the more than
half million stop and searches for drugs carried out in 2009/10 only 7%
resulted in arrest. This statistic alone demonstrates the 'scatter gun'
approach being adopted by police in their stop and search policies. It proves
that the individual officer rarely has a genuine sense of a real 'cause to
suspect', and is just exercising his powers randomly and without reason.
So why do I assert
that these random stops are increasing alienation among black and Asian people.
Well, the facts speak for themselves.
In 2009/10 there
were 10 stop and searches for drugs for every 1,000 people in England and
Wales.
Black people were
stopped and searched for drugs at 6.3 times the rate of white people, while
Asian people were stopped and searched for drugs at 2.5 times the rate and
those identifying as mixed race were stopped and searched for drugs at twice
the rate of white people. This is despite the fact that drug use is lower
amongst black and Asian people when compared to their white counterparts
.Black people are
arrested for a drugs offence at 6 times the rate of white people, and Asian
people are arrested at almost twice the rate of the white.
Black people are
more likely to receive a harsher police response for possession of drugs .
In 2009/10 78% of
black people caught in possession of cocaine by the Metropolitan Police were
charged for this offence and only 22% received cautions.
In comparison 44% of
white people were charged for the same offence and 56% received cautions.
Black people caught
in possession of cannabis by the Metropolitan Police are less likely to receive
a cannabis warning than white people, and are charged at 5 times the rate of
whites.
Prosecutions for
drug possession are at an all-time high and this is primarily being driven by
cannabis possession.
In 2010, the Crown
Prosecution Service brought more prosecutions for possession of drugs than in
any other year since the introduction of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 - 43,406
people were found guilty of drug possession. 60% of these prosecutions were for
cannabis.
Black people are
subject to court proceedings for drug possession offences at 4.5 times the rate
of whites, are found guilty of this offence at 4.5 times the rate, and are
subject to immediate custody at 5 times the rate of white people.
Once they have been
taken to court black people are less likely to be given a suspended prison
sentence for drug offences than white people.
Is it any wonder
that black people feel, (as it turns out, statistically correctly), that they
are subject to a far greater degree of police attention for something which is nothing
more than a personal life-style choice, albeit illegal!
Every year
approximately 80,000 people in England and Wales are convicted or cautioned for
possession of drugs. In the 15 year period, 1996 to 2011, 1.2 million
criminal records have been generated as a result of drug possession
laws.
In the light of
these statistics, let us just ask ourselves how it is the Government can go on
futilely seeking to persuade itself that 'The War on Drugs' is working? Can you
imagine the cost involved in persecuting (yes I have used that word deliberately)
80,000 people for nothing more than the possession of a small amount of a
naturally-growing plant which happens to provide them with some small degree of
personal pleasure, and which is entirely harmless to others.
This is why the
organisation that I chair in the UK, (Law Enforcement Against Prohibition UK, a
global organisation of former police officers and law enforcers), is so
determined that this is a policy which has got to be rescinded and taken off
the statute books. This is a piece of
legislative intervention whose time has run out and it must be reformed.
Of even more
importance, the police must be directed to stop this random stop and search
practice, if the aim is merely to find small amounts of drugs for personal use.
Police officers have a discretion as to how they exercise their many powers, (
I rarely. if ever engaged in randomly stopping members of the public to find
small quantities of marijuana)! There are many more useful things tat the
police could be doing with their time, regardless of the Home Office's
ridiculous statistics chase!
Michael Shiner,
co-author of the report and a senior lecturer in the department of social
policy at the London School of Economics said: “It’s shocking that police
officers are spending so much time targeting minor drug offences, rather than
focusing on more serious matters. This is not the result of a carefully
considered strategy, but is the unintended consequence of reforms that have
created a perverse incentive structure, rewarding officers for going after easy
pickings rather than doing good police work. While it is hard to see any
benefits in terms of tackling serious crime or promoting public safety, there
are real costs, including unnecessary infringements on people’s liberty,
discrimination against minorities and loss of trust and confidence in the
police.“
Ms Eastwood goes on
to say: “Black people are more likely to get a criminal record than white
people, are more likely to be taken to court and are more likely to be fined or
imprisoned for drug offences because of the way in which they are policed,
rather than because they are more likely to use drugs. Despite calls for police
reform of stop and search little has changed in the last 3 decades, this is why
the Government needs to take action and change the law.
Source
No comments:
Post a Comment