A rant in the park
by johntheother
by johntheother
As men, whether we’re a Men’s Activist, or just Going you Own Way, or
a man otherwise lacking self hatred, it’s easy to recognize social
violence against ourselves when we look at feminism.
Even this simple observation will be met with shrieks that the definition of feminism is equality – and that anyone who doesn’t agree is a woman hating, evil, shrivelled penis, neck-bearded, rape apologist.
But we’re not using the dictionary as our guide, instead, we’re using our knowledge of the real world in which feminism is just one political camp’s extension of gynocentrism.
Even this simple observation will be met with shrieks that the definition of feminism is equality – and that anyone who doesn’t agree is a woman hating, evil, shrivelled penis, neck-bearded, rape apologist.
But we’re not using the dictionary as our guide, instead, we’re using our knowledge of the real world in which feminism is just one political camp’s extension of gynocentrism.
And although policies driven by feminism are noxious, and
antithetical to civil rights, the feminist enterprise is a surface
symptom of a deeper issue.
Did tens of millions of men die during the wars of the world due to feminism? No, they died because in human cultures, men have always been disposable. You, gentlemen, are utilities to be used to your own destruction and discarded when broken.
Did tens of millions of men die during the wars of the world due to feminism? No, they died because in human cultures, men have always been disposable. You, gentlemen, are utilities to be used to your own destruction and discarded when broken.
And the narrative, constructed in recent history of the endless
victimization of women and their subjugation by men, is a narrative. It
is a story. And the fact that, as a narrative, it does not match with
our shared understanding of reality does not matter.
I was a men’s rights activist for many years, and a large part of
what I did was to point out the difference between reality as I
understood it, and the narrative feminist fantasy of every man being a
rapist in potential and every woman an eternal, helpless, child-like
victim.
Has anybody ever heard that 1 in 4 women on a university campus will
be sexually assaulted? This is a statistic so deeply embedded in the
public story of our culture that we can say the words “1 in 4” without
saying “women,” or “rape,” almost everybody in earshot will know that
we’re talking about the victimization of women. We’re not talking about
how many people carry a genetic leaning to contract diabetes, we’re not
talking about how many trees in BC are infested with pine beetles. You
say 1 in 4, and people just know.
And all the actual statistics, and studies, and law enforcement
publication of collected data, will not dislodge that so called fact
from public consciousness. It’s false, but it wont go away, and those
whose political narrative is bolstered by it have no hesitation to keep
trotting it out – false as it is. The real number is closer to 1 in
several thousand, for anybody who cares.
But I say don’t fight feminism. Don’t oppose it. Not because it’s not
based on lies, it is. And not because it’s violent and hateful, because
it’s those things too. Simply because you won’t stop it, and you will
end up closer in spirit to the flingers of hate when you try to oppose
them.
In fact – if you really are successful in taking the steam out of
some feminist campaign or other – your primary impact will be to amplify
the sense of victimization that feminists thrive on, and you will
energize that sector of the feminist project to greater excesses than
they would previously have entertained.
If you need an example of this, just think of Anita Sarkeesian. She’s
a grifter and a con artist, and every time this is publicly pointed
out, she is re-victimized – and walks away with another fat bag full of
cash and a humanist of the year award for her troubles. Debunking is
transmogrified to victimhood, and that is the fuel they run on.
There’s another reason to not fight feminism.
It helps men. I know that feminists like to claim this point, but
they generally mean something different than what I am suggesting here.
There are a number of people who, in response to feminist driven
social policies and laws, now advocate for traditionalism (or a
“neo-traditional” model) for male-female relations and family dynamics.
Some variation of a traditional family framework is what we generally
assume to have been standard prior to what is now a largely feminist
social structure.
And it is feminism we have to thank for the abandonment by men of
that old social model. The model that put men’s self actualization last
in line after the satisfaction of women’s safety, provision, comfort,
shopping, and shoes.
But men wouldn’t have woken up to just what a crap deal they were
getting if it had not been for the movement we now refer to as feminism.
And it wasn’t first, or even second wave feminism that woke men up. It
was the current gang of idiots. Being told that all men are rapists, and
that’s all they are, wasn’t enough. Being told that in spite of
history’s record of male creativity, that women are exactly as creative
as men – in fact, they’re more creative. So if you’re a man
with a lot of creativity, screw you, you’re a second rater because women
are better at the thing you’re best at. The only reason women didn’t
invent almost all of civilization is because you and your male ancestors
held them down like the tyrant you are.
Being told that when you do things to benefit women, you’re being a
sexist, in fact, just as much of a sexist as a guy who actively
disparages women. Being told that the way you sit down on public transit
is an act of aggression that harms women. Being told if you’re a male
feminist that no matter how much you do you’ll never have the esteem
granted to female feminists – nothing will ever be enough.
But I still say don’t fight feminism. And the reason is that the
stone cold hatred and weapons grade crazy is what men apparently need to
break free. But not to break free from feminism, that’s just a symptom.
To break free from the deeper problem of gynocentrism. The social force
that leads men to die on the job for a wife’s shopping spree and shoes,
or to die on a foreign battlefield to keep the price of gas down for
soccer moms to fill up their minivans.
With feminism, you are a hated subhuman, still chained to traditional
gender role of protect and provide, and die when it’s convenient for
others. But without feminism, what we would have is traditionalism –
which is where you were a mule chained to a cart, and once in a while
you get a carrot.
I don’t think you’re a mule, and I don’t think a carrot is good
enough. But it took the excesses of modern feminism to properly wake
men up. To wake some men up. It’s going to take more stone cold
crazy and weaponized hate to wake the rest up. And that’s why I say
don’t fight feminism, don’t oppose it.
In fact, I want to thank modern current wave feminists. They’re the wake up call for men.
No comments:
Post a Comment