1 May 2015

Feminist U.N. Advises Women Need More In Order To Compete With Men

By Well here we are, back at the beginning of the debate. Do we want equal opportunities for all or do we want equal outcomes for all?
The U.N. released a report as noted in TIME that said the latter is what the world should strive for. I know this sounds like communism… Well it is communism, but apparently it’s for a good cause. It’s for the benefit of women. It’s not fair that they would be expected to perform the same as men. They often decide to stay home and raise children, and why should that affect their bottom line? Why in the world would anyone’s decisions have to change the outcome or solvency of someone’s lifestyle.
You think maybe I’m exaggerating? Nope, here’s a quote.

 We must go beyond creating equal opportunities to ensure equal outcomes, the report says. “‘Different treatment may be required to achieve real equality in practice. This report, called progress of the worlds Women 20152016,
I wonder how far this should go? Should we ensure that the decision to not go to college or university has no affect on a persons life outcome.
It’s really not fair to stop someone from becoming a programmer just because they never went to school to learn to program! Maybe they couldn’t afford it? Maybe they decided that they just don’t have enough time to dedicate to study and work which would cause them not to be able to spend the time at home that they are entitled too.

Ahhh, the age old question. Do I spend more time at work and make more money or do I spend more time with my family? One allows me to provide a better standard of living for my family, the other allows me to be there for my family in person. It’s not fair that one seems to always come at the cost of the other, and life should always be fair you know.
Another jewel from the article addresses this apparent inequality

Removing legal barriers to female employment is not enough, the report says, noting that we also need measures that free up womens time.
I don’t know of any legal barriers to women’s employment, admittedly I live in the west and we have a much richer society than many of the countries they are referring to.

 The U.N. is calling for more decent work for women, which they define as a job that is well paid, secure and compatible with womens and mens shared responsibility for children and housework. The report also says redistributing household duties is critical for achieving substantive equality worldwide.
 So men should do less paid work and women should do more paid work. Who gets to decide how a household should run? Should it not be up to the people who live in that household? If it makes more sense for a man to work out of the house due to an income he can likely expect in comparison to her then who is the U.N. to tell these people they are wrong. That if only they would split each duty evenly, never one doing more than the other on any specific task regardless of what it does to a specific household, we can finally expect to see parity.
So how about these thoughts, mandate that half of parental leave be taken by the father, if there is no father then there is no second half of the leave, same would go for fathers if there was no mother in the picture. This would allow men to spend more time with their kids in their formative years and simultaneously force women to gain valuable seniority and experience in the job market.
We could ensure women are filling up the fields that have few of them by mandating what courses are available to them when they apply to university or college. We could say, no we have enough women nurses, you are eligible to take engineering or math this semester. How about we do the same for men, no sir, engineering isn’t available to you, you can take early childhood education, or nursing this semester.
I know that there are places out there where gender roles are fairly seriously enforced by society, but telling industries, companies, governments and employers that women need special rules and a helping hand helps no one. Especially women. I sometimes think the major difference between a feminist and a member of the MHRA is that the feminist doesn’t truly believe that Women are absolutely as capable of making wise decisions regarding their own life, or that they should have to bear the responsibility for those actions. The MHRA on the other hand says, ‘Go ahead, Make your bed and lie in it just as we all do.’

About Jason Sinclair

Jason is a 37 year old father of 2 daughters. Daughters that he wants to see take responsibility for their mistakes and not give credit to others for their successes. To not believe they are victims by default, but fully developed human beings with agency and responsibility.



  1. Not surprised here. Many have known this statement would eventually be made at some point. Women have become so deeply entitled and narcissistic that even their hyper-gynocentric leaders (feminists) can't keep themselves from admitting that feminism has nothing to do with equality.

    Feminism has never been about equality. Feminism is about the destruction of the patriarchy. What does that mean? It means the destruction of men and the transfer of their wealth and power to women. It means better outcomes for women and far worse outcomes for men. In other words, feminism isn't about equality of opportunity or equality of outcome. Feminism is about female superiority. In the US, thanks to their dead husbands, fathers and divorce raped X husbands, women now hold the majority of US wealth.

    If you think the feminists are crazy - you're kidding yourself. The feminists will win. They've been winning for several decades. In the not too distant future, women will be far more privileged members of society than men than they already are. In the US, women already receive the majority of state and federal funding for heath, education and welfare. Men are the majority of poor and homeless. Laws are already in place to specifically privilege women over men and to give women easy access to destroy men's lives (no-fault divorce, Title IX, Yes Means Yes, Affirmative Action, the VAWA, etc). These laws and policies have nothing to do with equality and everything to do with ensuring women's privilege over men and the redistribution of men's wealth and power to women.

    The pope recently made the statement that men need to stop blaming feminism for their problems. THE POPE SAID THIS! Know why? For the same reason white knight politicians pander to women for their votes. Gotta keep the meat in the seats, keep the money rolling in and keep the gynocracy voting for socialism/Marxism.

    Men are so very deeply screwed (and not in a good way).

    1. I could not agree more. As a father of boys and a girl I fear for all of them. Imagine the poor quality male who would submit to a marriage contract with my daughter, never mind that my sons are born into an era of such blatant disadvantage.

      Does it seem odd that we still ask cui bono? Our more or less self-appointed rulers have made their positions very clear. The Conservatives, Labour, Lib-Dems representing the Banksters in bed with the MIC have made their positions very clear in the UK and the American oligarchy has followed suit, now that the Pope has rung the bell what more evidence do we need?

      Who grows up to be the greater, the child that is mollycoddled or the one that has learnt with some struggle to stand on his or her own two feet?

      We see it in the quality of argument from MRAs as opposed to that of modern feminism.

      Yet above the gender war I suspect that this is as you have eluded too, the work of those who wish to divide and conquer us and that they are the only ones that benefit over the staggered disadvantages they dole out to us.

      The feminists fight to keep and extend their meager privileges and we fight against them and injustice, the new form of rabble control or Roman circus. We are too busy fighting each other to notice they are robbing us all blind

      Everywhere around the globe the destruction of the family is the goal, …divided we fall and the few selfish women hanging onto the lie are traitors in our midst.

      Roll on the velvet egalitarian revolution.

    2. Yes. It's very important that everyone recognize that it's all about divide and conquer. Unfortunately, the majority of women will sit back and watch men be destroyed. Why? Because the denigration of men and the redistribution of wealth from men to women suits them. The bonus is - so long as they don't claim to be feminists - they really had nothing to do with the plight of men. It's no different than the mass silence of people during the slave days or the mass silence while the Jews were being slaughtered. There was an unacknowledged, unspoken gain being had - and those having it weren't going to rock the boat. Sure - there's a minority of women out there working for true fairness and equality, but the vast majority of women will sit idly by as men are pushed further and further down the economic and social ladder. What we get most right now is what I like to call "equality lip service". "Feminism helps men, too." LOL. See any women fighting against women's dominance in college? Nope!

      Now that men are opting out of marriage in record numbers and the birth rate is collapsing in Westernized nations, even the pope is getting his white knight on. Unfortunately, that means more male shaming and pandering to the gynocracy. That in turn means more division and more men opting out of marriage and family. Tis a return to the days of the fall of Rome.

      With all the evidence we have to date, it's clear that feminism is about privileging women at the expense of men's lives; which is why you don't see a strong, organized effort to nix male-only selective service or any other federal or state program that is unfairly funded or targeted at privileging women over men.

      I can definitely see where the rich would want women to have power, privilege and carefully disguised, man-hating authority over men. Why? Women create the next generation of wage and tax slaves. To the rich, keeping them happy and men subservient to women works in both women's and the rich's favor. For these reasons, every effort will be made to either boost the marriage and birth rates or to divert even more wealth and power from men to women. These "programs" will be extremely stealthy. Examples are the "cohabitation rights bill" in the UK, which was specifically written to give women rights to alimony and asset division upon breakup and "Yes Means Yes", which is a back door method of opening men up to civil law suits, a way to give women totalitarian control over sex (See Brian Banks and other high profile athletes) and a way for women to attack and destroy patriarchal power structures (see Rolling Stone and the Greek Fraternity attack) and female only STEM classes (they already exist).

      Feminism is all about money, power and control and the transfer of such from men to women. As the video in question indicates, one way or another, feminists are here to make sure that redistribution of power and wealth happens. Men opting out of marriage and family will not stop that redistribution. No-fault divorce isn't the only way to "get er done".

      I don't think most men realize what women are talking about when they talk about the "wage gap" - including the white knight pope. The point women are making isn't so much that men make more than women. The point women are making is that men make more because the things with which they choose to endeavor are more financially valuable (STEM fields) in the open market. To women, the jobs in which they normally endeavor should be paid more to compensate for the intrinsic lower market value of those positions (the not so STEM fields). Yes, this is most certainly socialism/Marxism. This video makes that ABUNDANTLY clear.