By Laura Perrins: First came the announcement that Hollywood was going to create an all-girls Lord of the Flies, then on Saturday John Lewis said it would make all its children’s clothes ‘gender neutral’. The all-out assault on children, their innocence and reality itself has been relentless.
First, the idiotic idea that one can make an all-female Lord of the Flies movie that remains faithful to the message of the book. The big problem with an all-girls Lord of the Flies is that a gender switch means it is no longer Lord of the Flies.
This is obvious because of the inherent differences between the sexes, which are played out day in, day out, in homes and schools across the country. We know what happens when a group of boys get together: they are boisterous, they wreck your house, they like to fight.
Yes, there are quieter boys who like to read a book, and they are boys just as much as the house-wrecker. But the point, as William Golding demonstrated so effectively, is that these quiet boys are the ones that get picked on by the bullies when adults are not there to impose rules and civilise said bullies.
What exactly will the writers do with the girls in the wild? Will the mean ones psychologically torture the nice ones, while they all starve to death? Will the tomboy who went to Boy Scouts organise everyone to sit around the campfire and collaborate on what to do next?
Or will they, as the feminists would have us believe, do exactly what the boys did – go wild, savage and turn on the weaker girls? This is the golden thread in feminist thought: the idea that it is a great triumph when women live down to the lowest standards of men.
The point is that in scenario one or two the film is no longer Lord of the Flies, and in scenario three the idea is too unbelievable to be taken seriously, because in general girls are not as rough and wild as boys.
Which brings us nicely to the equally idiotic decision by John Lewis to make all their girls’ and boys’ clothes ‘gender neutral’.
The Independent said: ‘John Lewis has become the first UK retailer to remove gender labels from its children’s clothing. The department store chain has not only taken “girls” and “boys” labels from clothes, but has also done away with the separate sections in stores. John Lewis own-brand children clothing will now simply say “Girls & Boys” or “Boys & Girls”.
Let’s be clear: this is not countering sexism, it is promoting delusion. The idea that a girl might like dinosaurs, therefore you could put dinosaurs on a dress, was too much for John Lewis to handle. No, instead they have to pretend that this dress can be worn by both boys and girls.
This move does not push back on sexism; in fact it subtly reinforces it. It seems one cannot have a girls’ t-shirt with ‘Future Scientist’ on it – instead we should abolish this notion of girls as scientists completely.
This campaign to tell children that boys and girls can switch genders as easily as they can change their clothes is evil. It propagates the lie, like the idea behind the Lord of the Flies revamp, that there are no innate differences between the sexes. On a more serious note, this lie ends up putting women on the front line in hand-to-hand combat – the height of delusion with dangerous results.
The fact is that men and women are different in significant and profound ways. The most obvious is the reproductive system but boys already have greater muscle mass, core strength and, above all, testosterone than girls. The amount of testosterone boys are exposed to in the womb is the primary reason why they are so much more aggressive than girls. This is why, when they grow up without proper adult guidance, they can turn out to be Left-wing Antifa thugs or white supremacist idiots.
So, sadly for me, John Lewis becomes one more store on the boycott list. Tiresome, but necessary. I leave it up to you, dear reader, whether you should do the same.
Source
This is obvious because of the inherent differences between the sexes, which are played out day in, day out, in homes and schools across the country. We know what happens when a group of boys get together: they are boisterous, they wreck your house, they like to fight.
Yes, there are quieter boys who like to read a book, and they are boys just as much as the house-wrecker. But the point, as William Golding demonstrated so effectively, is that these quiet boys are the ones that get picked on by the bullies when adults are not there to impose rules and civilise said bullies.
What exactly will the writers do with the girls in the wild? Will the mean ones psychologically torture the nice ones, while they all starve to death? Will the tomboy who went to Boy Scouts organise everyone to sit around the campfire and collaborate on what to do next?
Or will they, as the feminists would have us believe, do exactly what the boys did – go wild, savage and turn on the weaker girls? This is the golden thread in feminist thought: the idea that it is a great triumph when women live down to the lowest standards of men.
The point is that in scenario one or two the film is no longer Lord of the Flies, and in scenario three the idea is too unbelievable to be taken seriously, because in general girls are not as rough and wild as boys.
Which brings us nicely to the equally idiotic decision by John Lewis to make all their girls’ and boys’ clothes ‘gender neutral’.
The Independent said: ‘John Lewis has become the first UK retailer to remove gender labels from its children’s clothing. The department store chain has not only taken “girls” and “boys” labels from clothes, but has also done away with the separate sections in stores. John Lewis own-brand children clothing will now simply say “Girls & Boys” or “Boys & Girls”.
Let’s be clear: this is not countering sexism, it is promoting delusion. The idea that a girl might like dinosaurs, therefore you could put dinosaurs on a dress, was too much for John Lewis to handle. No, instead they have to pretend that this dress can be worn by both boys and girls.
This move does not push back on sexism; in fact it subtly reinforces it. It seems one cannot have a girls’ t-shirt with ‘Future Scientist’ on it – instead we should abolish this notion of girls as scientists completely.
This campaign to tell children that boys and girls can switch genders as easily as they can change their clothes is evil. It propagates the lie, like the idea behind the Lord of the Flies revamp, that there are no innate differences between the sexes. On a more serious note, this lie ends up putting women on the front line in hand-to-hand combat – the height of delusion with dangerous results.
The fact is that men and women are different in significant and profound ways. The most obvious is the reproductive system but boys already have greater muscle mass, core strength and, above all, testosterone than girls. The amount of testosterone boys are exposed to in the womb is the primary reason why they are so much more aggressive than girls. This is why, when they grow up without proper adult guidance, they can turn out to be Left-wing Antifa thugs or white supremacist idiots.
So, sadly for me, John Lewis becomes one more store on the boycott list. Tiresome, but necessary. I leave it up to you, dear reader, whether you should do the same.
Source
I was with you there Laura until near the end of the above piece when a] you sounded as though you were claiming there are no female Antifa thugs and b] you sounded as though you were claiming it's only cool to be a white nationalist if your from Russia and pretending to be Hebrew, but not if you're European white in the US, UK or Greece.
ReplyDeleteOf course this is a message for you and the many who read my blog as I'm 100% sure you'll sensor this perspective, after all I used to work at a conservative head office, so even if you haven't figured it yet, I watched Jewish banksters first hand paying for everything and calling all the shots, just as they do with labour.
I respect your work from the perspective of an egalitarian who takes issue with feminism and have reposted such work of yours many times on this blog, but here I just think that you started off well and then went more than a little off track in a vein attempt to show your understandable displeasure with Antifa. So your post has to come along with this comment.
If you do a little research [the search bar on my blog 'Angelo Agathangelou' will help] you will find that just like FEMEN and the recently exposed Italian network set up to ease the passage of African migrants into Europe, Antifa have been paid for by George Soros and in the case of FEMEN George Soros in tandem with the Jewish state of Israel. There is plenty of video evidence. You know the same Jewish State who's UK embassy staff were recently caught on camera plotting to bring down conservative government ministers and ridiculing Boris, who must have been paid well to personally tell us from his commons podium that it was no big deal the very next day.
Back to the main point about your above piece. Nationalism to one degree or another is what we all live who need a passport and for example I can not fault my brother Greeks for getting serious about the fact that children in Athens are fainting in class rooms from malnutrition and adults continue to suicide in record numbers and seeing this devastation of their fellows, then form the Greek nationalist group Golden Dawn, just as being a Londoner, I can't fault the decent non racist white nationalists I know who are pissed off about the poor white men sitting outside virtually every shop in some areas begging for scraps and want to do something about it.
The issue of rampant misandry and ubiquitous gynocentrism is separate and distinct from the issue of nationalism mainly because if one is well off one usually doesn't need nationalism, whereas rich or poor, men and boys have all been fucked by Duluth model feminism pushing to expand historic female privilege to new record highs, because now apparently male's being sacrificed as second class citizens on sinking ships isn't enough.
One thing is the issue of humanity's required renaissance with regards to the instincts based on survival mathematics that guide female privilege re the sinking ship scenario and the other [nationalism] is the issue of like people uniting in order to overcome disaster. ...Except for Jews who we're told by the Jewish Chronicle are well over 99% stinking land thieves and genocidal apartheid supporter nationalists, because uniquely their culture tells them they were chosen by a god and are therefore superior to the rest of us.