…and there are two sides to the Jimmy Savile saga
The Slog: That Jimmy Savile was very odd indeed is hard to question. But as
regular Sloggers know, I have increasingly come to the view over time
that (a) he has become a magnet for those who seek publicity and money;
and (b) he has been used as a weapon of mass distraction by others with
various agendas. As time has gone on, this obfuscation has been
complicated further by the unerring instincts of the MSM for
exaggeration, invention, and anything else that might sell newspapers.
Nowhere is this more evident than in the Murdoch press, whose owner
(the miraculous Alzheimer’s reverser Rupert) has of course an obvious
agenda: to smear anyone and everyone associated with the BBC. What began
with Plod trying to put every case of child sex abuse at Savile’s door
(“Saves orn the paperwork, squire”) then ballooned into multiple arrests
of obscure DJs, soap stars and one-time sports reporters. Most of them
seem to me – looking at the facts – to have been sad old gropers: sex
pests yes, but paedophiles? Look closely at some of the press
statements, and you will I fancy join me in suspecting that a little
judicious age-lowering here and there has been employed by the boys in
blue.
Yesterday, former care-home inmate and blogging aristocrat Anna Racoon ran a piece
about what Savile’s family is going through, and why. It will raise
doubts in the mind of any fair and intelligent observer of this issue.
Like everything Anna does, it is contrarian but extensively researched –
using direct contact with the Savile family. It shows that, at the very
least, that there has been avarice, distortion and deception in this
case. Savile is clearly guilty of some horrendous nastiness, sexual and
otherwise; but he has been placed into the smoke rising from Hell, and
this is pure tabloid invention: the Devil, you might say, is in the
distraction.
What Mme Raccoon boffs on about quite a lot is that still by far the majority of paedophilia takes place outside the care system by adults the children know…a sizeable percentage of whom are family members. I posted about this
very topic eleven days ago, but while this is an incontrovertible fact,
the key points driving me and others in a quest to lift the carpet on
systemic abuse remain as follows:
Visit any Underclass area of any major conurbation, and you
will see endless groups – directly or indirectly – associated with the
act of or trade in paedophilia. You will find evidence of systemic
complicity – some of it judicial, some of it local government, and some
of it religiously based. You will hear politicians going lalalalalalah.
You will be shocked by the cynical and/or criminal involvement of senior
police officers. You will find social services turf wars, corrupt
psychiatrists, braindead Judges, and men who are clearly flying a false
flag in positions of great responsibility directly involved in the
“care” of vulnerable or disturbed children. Mainly, you will given
gagging orders.
Look as I have at Canada, Holland, New Zealand, Australia,
the US and Asia, and you will find these patterns repeated over and over
again: this is not a global conspiracy, but it most certainly is a
global problem. Only here in Britain, however, does the Establishment
seem to have an interest in losing reports, suppressing evidence,
finding distractions, denying the obvious, and working on the mad basis
that the only paedophile is a dead paedophile.
Former Cabinet Ministers, Rotherham taxi drivers, Liverpool
Councillors, Wrexham hoteliers, Devon cops, Staffordshire doctors, and
hundreds of women with lots of children and no fathers have all
convinced me over the last seven years that, while there is a lunatic
fringe and an avaricious minority, organised child trafficking, systemic
child abuse and persistent sexual opportunism are all blighting the
lives of a significant number of children in care.
The Education Minister Michael Gove’s view is one of blanket denial.
The Health Minister Jeremy Hunt never mentions it, nor does Welfare
Minister Iain Duncan-Smith. I have yet to hear a single utterance about
this subject from Ed Balls, Harriet Harman or Yvette Cooper. When Tom
Watson gallantly raised the issue in the Commons, David Cameron’s body
language was at best shifty. Not a dicky bird from Home Secretary
Theresa Nutsin-May, despite the fact that her police forces have been
opening, closing, dead-ending, reopening under pressure and then
arresting here and there for decades now.
What’s happening here is the covering of the backside. It is the same
– except even worse – as the explosive Coop Bank bailin information now
coming to light about pensioners’ lives becoming a wreck, purely to
save the political neck. We the citizens and our children come last: it
shouldn’t be that way, but it so obviously is, those who deny it must
either be asleep, or Establishment members with a great deal to hide.
A total of four arrests have now been made in the Fernbridge enquiry.
A former Cabinet Minister is under suspicion, and lots of papers are
being shuffled around from one agency to another in the hope they might
self-immolate during the process. Nobody in the MSM – with the
honourable exception of Christopher Booker at the Telegraph – is asking
the bigger question: why is this not a massive national issue being
debated openly in the Commons?
The answer is, I’m afraid, the same old same old. All the paths lead
back to the same obscene mélange of bribery, Council corruption, the
involvement of privileged groups from Cardinals and Asian taxi-drivers
to Royalty, and the protection of Parliamentary members in both the
Commons and the Lords. It is just another dimension of a sick culture
slithering down into the sewers.
Meanwhile, a paedophile pensioner who abused children in a church-run
home in Edinburgh faces a lengthy jail sentence after being found
guilty on 22 charges of sex abuse relating to children. In May this
year, alcoholic paedophile Mark Bridger – a man who lived out violent
sex fantasies about young girls on the internet – went to jail for the
murder of April Jones. But Dominic Grieve QC, the attorney general, is
busy on more weighty matters: prosecuting a 21-year-old juror on a
paedophile-case jury for writing on his Facebook page “Woooow I wasn’t
expecting to be in a jury Deciding a paedophile’s fate, I’ve always
wanted to F**k up a paedophile & now I’m within the law!” That we
have braindead jurors is of little surprise to me; I am merely left
wondering WTF Grieve is doing handling this case when he has, surely,
far bigger fish to fry.
Lalalalalalalalalalalah.
No comments:
Post a Comment