Yesterday, June 24, yet another media alliance has been established
that has a very different purpose than the aforementioned initiatives.
The hidden objectives, though, are just as dubious.
The European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF – ecpmf.eu), based in Leipzig, is a collaboration of 20 journalists associations, publishing houses, academic institutions, trade unions and media rights experts from 19 countries who claim that together they aim to “unite Europe’s highly fragmented media freedom community and to address media freedom violations.”
Like it is always the case with such initiatives, the sales pitches and official mission statements are merely a facade because such alliances and initiatives are always used for very different purposes, even when many of the persons involved truly want to do good and contribute to a better society.
The problems rise when one starts to look at who is funding this new alliance, so when George Soros his Open Societies Foundations and the EU appear in the list of partners and donors then we already know what the deal is: subversion and social engineering.
Journalismfund.eu, one of the founding partners of the ECPMF, is funded by the Open Societies Foundations. In 2009 Soros provided 114,000 euro, in 2011 324,000 euro, in 2013 79,664 euro, in 2014 26,696 euro and 100,000 euro in 2015. Other sponsors include the EU and the Citi Bank Foundation.
Almost all other founding partners their sponsors include the EU in one or several ways.
Why is this worrying? Because George Soros is known for funding “spontaneous” revolutions, for funding mechanisms that allow for the control of news and reports originating in regions where by outside interests orchestrated turmoil exists. These mechanisms and the control over news allow for full narrative control and control over the flow of information across the world. Information that is largely pushed by western news corporations.
Another founding partner of the ECPMF, Ossigeno Per L’informazione, is funded by UNESCO. Also there problems arise since the UN is notorious for controlling and imposing lies and fabricated narratives; aside from being one of the world’s leading corrupt, pedophile and genocidal crime syndicates.
SEEMO, also an ECPMF partner, has as one of its main objectives to streamline mainstream and “new media” activities and developments. Meaning that mainstream press and new media – or alternative media – in South, East and Central Europe are being homogenized through their efforts too. This also means that what alternative media outlets put out, especially online, will be increasingly in line with that what mainstream counterparts pontificate. Yet another reason why the hardcore information rebellion keeps getting smaller and smaller because similar activity is happening right now all around the world. Hence the tiny rebellion – and the former truth movement is not part of this rebellion. I have explained this already several times before.
Now what the real implications are here is that as this alliance of mostly well-meaning folks go and protect the rights of journalists and rally for more investigative journalism their efforts and results are being funneled into agendas that they don’t control and would likely oppose if they were aware of it.
It doesn’t take a scientist or engineer to understand that through such an alliance, like the ECPMF, George Soros and the EU for instance are being provided with an extremely valuable instrument that can accurately measure how these corporative sponsors can fine-tune their agendas, their social engineering and subversion campaigns. That is the very reason why they donate to such initiatives in the first place. For them it’s not a donation at all, it’s an investment and so they want something in return.
What we will have as results from this is that in Europe, and beyond, destabilization campaigns (engineered regime changes) and corporate dominance (fascist planetism) will become bigger, more efficient and more lucrative for those who invest in and instigate such campaigns.
A global government can’t be achieved in one step, it needs to happen incrementally to not scare the public too much or everyone will pull out and stop paying taxes. It can also not be achieved with actions in one region, lets say the USA because not everyone loves America and for a world government you need the biggest part of the world population to support you. Thus, from that perspective the creation and sponsoring of an ECPMF makes perfect sense.
The journalists of both media blocks are happy because they feel that their voices are being heard and appreciated because even the EU and George Soros want to give them money for their rights initiatives. And the perception arises that finally mainstream media has been forced to listen to what the “alternative media” has been saying all along. But as you know, that perception is a false one, since it has been orchestrated from the very start. Mainstream media is not changing its positions, it’s simply riding the alternative waves every now and then because it is also lucrative. Truth does sell indeed sometimes but deception remains the most profitable in the long run.
The EU and Soros are also happy because they now have yet another instrument that others work hard for, mostly even for free
since it concerns a volunteer-based non-profit initiative, that will
allow them to successfully control and steer the public opinion. What
are a few hundreds of thousands of euros when that buys you narrative
control in the EU and beyond. Not a bad investment at all.
This makes me question the actual value of the investigative journalism that the ECPMF represents because if they have failed to see or investigate that their vehicle will be hijacked by the EU and the Open Societies Foundations, then how “investigative” is this new outfit truly? Surely they don’t pose a serious threat to the European Federation and George Soros.
Lastly, when you look at the ECPMF Charter for instance, it looks promising on the surface. Fighting for journalists rights, no censorship, opposing the spying on journalists – a touch of Snowden heroism if you will. Unfortunately those putting trust in the ECPMF will sooner or later have to admit that the ECPMF like Snowden is merely a false hero. But by then they’ll have given Soros and the EU a wonderful return on investment.
The European Centre for Press and Media Freedom (ECPMF – ecpmf.eu), based in Leipzig, is a collaboration of 20 journalists associations, publishing houses, academic institutions, trade unions and media rights experts from 19 countries who claim that together they aim to “unite Europe’s highly fragmented media freedom community and to address media freedom violations.”
Like it is always the case with such initiatives, the sales pitches and official mission statements are merely a facade because such alliances and initiatives are always used for very different purposes, even when many of the persons involved truly want to do good and contribute to a better society.
The problems rise when one starts to look at who is funding this new alliance, so when George Soros his Open Societies Foundations and the EU appear in the list of partners and donors then we already know what the deal is: subversion and social engineering.
Journalismfund.eu, one of the founding partners of the ECPMF, is funded by the Open Societies Foundations. In 2009 Soros provided 114,000 euro, in 2011 324,000 euro, in 2013 79,664 euro, in 2014 26,696 euro and 100,000 euro in 2015. Other sponsors include the EU and the Citi Bank Foundation.
Almost all other founding partners their sponsors include the EU in one or several ways.
Why is this worrying? Because George Soros is known for funding “spontaneous” revolutions, for funding mechanisms that allow for the control of news and reports originating in regions where by outside interests orchestrated turmoil exists. These mechanisms and the control over news allow for full narrative control and control over the flow of information across the world. Information that is largely pushed by western news corporations.
Another founding partner of the ECPMF, Ossigeno Per L’informazione, is funded by UNESCO. Also there problems arise since the UN is notorious for controlling and imposing lies and fabricated narratives; aside from being one of the world’s leading corrupt, pedophile and genocidal crime syndicates.
SEEMO, also an ECPMF partner, has as one of its main objectives to streamline mainstream and “new media” activities and developments. Meaning that mainstream press and new media – or alternative media – in South, East and Central Europe are being homogenized through their efforts too. This also means that what alternative media outlets put out, especially online, will be increasingly in line with that what mainstream counterparts pontificate. Yet another reason why the hardcore information rebellion keeps getting smaller and smaller because similar activity is happening right now all around the world. Hence the tiny rebellion – and the former truth movement is not part of this rebellion. I have explained this already several times before.
Now what the real implications are here is that as this alliance of mostly well-meaning folks go and protect the rights of journalists and rally for more investigative journalism their efforts and results are being funneled into agendas that they don’t control and would likely oppose if they were aware of it.
It doesn’t take a scientist or engineer to understand that through such an alliance, like the ECPMF, George Soros and the EU for instance are being provided with an extremely valuable instrument that can accurately measure how these corporative sponsors can fine-tune their agendas, their social engineering and subversion campaigns. That is the very reason why they donate to such initiatives in the first place. For them it’s not a donation at all, it’s an investment and so they want something in return.
What we will have as results from this is that in Europe, and beyond, destabilization campaigns (engineered regime changes) and corporate dominance (fascist planetism) will become bigger, more efficient and more lucrative for those who invest in and instigate such campaigns.
A global government can’t be achieved in one step, it needs to happen incrementally to not scare the public too much or everyone will pull out and stop paying taxes. It can also not be achieved with actions in one region, lets say the USA because not everyone loves America and for a world government you need the biggest part of the world population to support you. Thus, from that perspective the creation and sponsoring of an ECPMF makes perfect sense.
The journalists of both media blocks are happy because they feel that their voices are being heard and appreciated because even the EU and George Soros want to give them money for their rights initiatives. And the perception arises that finally mainstream media has been forced to listen to what the “alternative media” has been saying all along. But as you know, that perception is a false one, since it has been orchestrated from the very start. Mainstream media is not changing its positions, it’s simply riding the alternative waves every now and then because it is also lucrative. Truth does sell indeed sometimes but deception remains the most profitable in the long run.
The EU and Soros are also happy because they now have yet another instrument that others work hard for, mostly even for free
since it concerns a volunteer-based non-profit initiative, that will
allow them to successfully control and steer the public opinion. What
are a few hundreds of thousands of euros when that buys you narrative
control in the EU and beyond. Not a bad investment at all.This makes me question the actual value of the investigative journalism that the ECPMF represents because if they have failed to see or investigate that their vehicle will be hijacked by the EU and the Open Societies Foundations, then how “investigative” is this new outfit truly? Surely they don’t pose a serious threat to the European Federation and George Soros.
Lastly, when you look at the ECPMF Charter for instance, it looks promising on the surface. Fighting for journalists rights, no censorship, opposing the spying on journalists – a touch of Snowden heroism if you will. Unfortunately those putting trust in the ECPMF will sooner or later have to admit that the ECPMF like Snowden is merely a false hero. But by then they’ll have given Soros and the EU a wonderful return on investment.
No comments:
Post a Comment