Feminism - The Greatest Of All Lies Ever Told

By Brian [MRA]: Men have been manipulated and exploited by women for centuries. Women expect men to bring more to the table than women do financially and physically - or they're not "marriageable"; hence the provider and protector role with which men have been sadistically saddled.
[Left: Vintage Jimi by WB7]
This sexist and exploitative role for men was socially induced and enforced by women upon men as well as by other men - meaning that society held men up to provider/protector role/standard to be considered marriageable or as a candidate for decent employment. What's the most common theme on the internet for men and marriage these days? The lack of "marriageable men". The message is - if you can't provide money to women - as a man - you have no worth.
"Traditional", in the context of relationships between men and women, is a term used to describe the financial, legal, physical, spiritual and psychological exploitation of men by women.
"Chivalry" is the social manipulation of men's ego and sense of worth for purposes of encouraging men to sacrifice for women - even if the sacrifice means men's deaths. Chivalry is gynocentrism and a women first mindset - AKA male disposability.



Fortunately, marriage rates are dropping the globe over and women are having to learn to fend for themselves. For every woman that opts out of marriage, another man is saved from the life destruction of divorce. To counter men’s escape from this most misandric of institutions, many nations are now enabling de facto marriage - which essentially forces marriage upon men after X number of months of cohabitation and gives girlfriends the rights to alimony and asset division should their boyfriends dump them. In the UK - it's called the Cohabitation Rights Bill.

Rape culture is the latest of the hypergynocentric (feminist) inventions. Both progressives and conservatives can get behind 'affirmative consent' because it demonizes men and potentially stops hookup culture - all with the foundation of deeply fraudulent, almost entirely made up rape statistics. Such manipulation of statistics to push a political agenda should in and of itself be a crime. It's mass fraud on a global scale.

Affirmative consent is a very simple concept - yet people seem to want to make it complicated. It was never intended to stop rape. It was intended to stop hookup culture and give women the power to destroy the lives of men when women don't get their way. Affirmative consent means that if you can't definitively prove she said yes throughout the sexual encounter - all the way through the sexual encounter - then if she accuses you of rape or sexual assault - you get expelled and your future as a man is destroyed. Major backers have even admitted that AC was intended to make men fear sex with women. Hypergynocentrists (feminists) have been pushing to have ‘Yes Means Yes’ made a part of VAWA or a facsimile thereof ever since mattress girl and the Rolling Stone UVA rape hoax.

Ever notice that adult women go after adolescent boys when they rape? Know why? Because young boys are weaker, less powerful, naive and are not yet able to counter adult women in sexual situations. Ever wonder what would happen if society drilled into these boys’ heads that these women were rapists in the same way they drill into women's heads that drunken regret sex is rape? What happens instead? Women are given probation - not prison like men - and the boys are taught that they were lucky. As always, hypocrisy and double standards are the hallmarks of hypergynocentrism.


Ever since white-knight Ronald Reagan enacted no-fault divorce (the divorce rape of men) in the US, marriage and committed relationships have become anti-male. There is no worse decision you can make as a man than to give a woman the ring of power – or any power for that matter.

How is it empowerment for women to eschew marriage and traditional roles but weakness and misogyny if men act in kind? How did women imagine that they'd walk away from their traditional roles and not expect men to do the same? How is it that men suffering 98% of workplace deaths and deaths related to national defense isn't cause for a gender based national outcry - but rape is considered the most horrific of crimes? Hypocrisy and double standards - that's how. Between suicides, workplace and national defense deaths, tens upon tens of thousands of men, in the US alone die every year. Know why there’s no national campaign to stop this horrific exploitation of men? I think we all know why.

It's important to remember that women demand all of the special treatment and exploitation of men listed above - but it is other men that enact the policies and legislation that enforces male disposability, hypergynocentrism (feminism) and destroy men by the hundreds of thousands in divorce court every single year.

When it comes to femsplaining and toxic-femininity, the hypocrisy and double standards are usually thick enough to choke a horse. You can find examples of femsplaining, discrimination against men, sexism against men, toxic-femininity, hypocrisy and double standards all throughout feminist discourse. The best way to stop this campus rape would be to have men and women only colleges – yet women demand more and more coed dorms and fraternities. Know why? The answer is more simple than you thought. Women can’t control men’s speech in male-only spaces, nor can they manipulate, exploit and/or destroy men’s lives without close proximity to their targets. This is why women are fine with women-only gyms and other women-only (safe) spaces but protest male-only fraternities and other male-only spaces.

[Below: Carlin 2016 by WB7]

Most men have been so "indoctrinated" into a woman-first mentality since birth - they become anti-male (AKA - white knights) and enact legislation that is deeply harmful to other men in the name of women's rights. These men are cowards and unable to defend themselves or others against the fallacy of female oppression. The more women complain - the more men are oppressed - especially by other men. This is another reason why women despise male-only spaces. They can't force the social and financial ostracization of men that might expose the truths listed above unless they have the power to socially and financially ostrasize men that stand up for themselves.

If you ever wondered why feminists wish to stop anti-feminist speech on the internet - wonder no more. It's almost comical to see a man try to speak such truths in public. As a matter of fact - it's dangerous for men to speak publicly (non-anonymously) against the supposed oppression of women - especially if you want to get elected/re-elected. To speak against feminists in this manner has been halted through a form of social and financial blackmail. "If you don't support us - we'll see that you're fired, unemployable and hated by women everywhere." This is the foundation of "rape apologist", "stare rape", "man spreading", "man splaining", boycotts and ridiculous claims of misogyny should you dare arrive at the possibility of an opposing view. A man that defends himself against the open hatred of men by women is equated with a rapist or murderer by women and especially by other men.

***

Full disclosure - A lot of what I write is inspired by other men. To name a few - Barbarossaa, Sandman and Spetsnaz.  

I've posted under many names over the many years I've been writing. I'm getting ready to expose my true identity soon, like others have. Like most - I have to wait until I can support myself through the inevitable attacks and setups that follow the open contradiction of man-hating feminism and gynocentrism. I hate hiding myself - but I know I'll be fired and I know I'll suffer both social and financial ostrisization from the moment I expose my identity. I've been banned from most men's rights and feminists sites to boot. Why? Men's right's gynocentrists and white knights hate men.