Transgenders Are 58% More Likely To Commit Murder Than Be Murdered ~ Lesbian Couples Are The Most Violent

By Eric Striker: Transmania has taken cultural elites in the English speaking world by storm. Famous left-liberal JK Rowling is currently being hounded on Twitter for "transphobia," chic celebrities are now stating their pronouns, and presidential contender Elizabeth Warren has promised to read the names of transgender martyrs (mostly killed prostituting or in drug deals gone wrong) every year from the White House lawn if elected.  
The transsexual movement's driving myth is that there is an epidemic of murders targeting them for their stated "identities." The controlled press in America and the UK has been the main culprit in building this fictitious narrative, constantly reminding us that 24 trannies were killed in 2019, as if their lives are more special than the 17-18,000 victims of homicide every year.

Women Statistically Much Safer, Physically And Sexually, Marrying Or Cohabiting With A Heterosexual Man Rather Than With A Lesbian

By: Taylor Larson:

• Women are 2 times or more likely to be physically assaulted, beaten, or abused by a lesbian domestic partner than by a heterosexual male partner.
• Women are about 10 times more likely to be sexually abused or raped by a lesbian domestic partner than by a heterosexual male partner.
• Research exposing the epidemic of lesbian rape, sex abuse, and physical abuse of intimate partners has been ignored by the mainstream media and buried in academia due to political correctness.
• Domestic abuse and sexual assault campaigns almost always involve imagery of a male perpetrator and a female victim. Very few campaigns focus on same-sex partnerships, which are statistically more violent than heterosexual relationships.
• Women are statistically much safer, both physically and sexually, marrying or cohabiting with a heterosexual male rather than with a lesbian partner.

Angry Lesbians

By Tim Patten: Not all angry lesbians are like Valerie Jean Solanas, who authored SCUM Manifesto and attempted to murder artist Andy Warhol.[i]  Her 1967 book argued that men have ruined the world and that it is up to women to fix this problem by aborting all male babies.
That said, there are many who appear to share her feelings. In recent times, women, mostly radicalized angry lesbians, have launched genocidal social media campaigns, labeled with monikers such as “#killallmen,” “Control All Men,”[ii] “StraightWhiteMemes,”[iii] and “Kill All White Men.”[iv] These memes–which, like the SCUM Manifesto, are guised as satire and connect with millions of females who resent our place in society. They fanaticize about harming and wielding power over us, going so far as to make killing males seem artistically relevant.[v]
Amid such anger and resentment, it seems doubtful that any of the so-called women’s movements, populated with adherents who despise us, can help resolve the many important issues we men grapple with, including a pandemic of male suicides. Rather, they seem largely oriented toward our demise.

Five Feminist Lies We Take For Granted

By Pierre Lescaudron: Sexuality is to feminism what work is to Marxism… the molding, direction, and expression of sexuality organizes society into two sexes: women and men. This division underlies the totality of social relations.”

Catharine McKinnon, one of the founders of ‘radical feminism’

Some years ago I began an unexpected journey down the feminist rabbit-hole. It was in 2014 when my Grandma asked me about the winner of the Eurovision Song Contest and I found myself unable to explain who the winner was: Conchita Wurst, a man who dresses like a woman and wears make-up, but sports a beard.
In hindsight, I realize this journey was a painful process, probably because it touched something deep in me. The data I discovered were in conflict with my protective instinct, something that is deeply wired in males. While females are hardwired to nurture and care, men are wired to provide and protect.
So when a man is exposed to victimized women (as depicted by the feminist narrative), it triggers his core instinct and social duty to protect. In addition, the instinctual hijack and deep cultural values tend to inhibit any proper intellectual functioning.
The above might be one of the reasons why the victimhood of women is so central to the feminist ideology. It might also be one of the reasons why so many men blindly embrace feminist narratives.

Riding The Donkey Backwards: Men As The Unacceptable Victims Of Marital Violence

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Science Vs. Feminism - Intimate Partner Violence Worldwide

By Non Controversy: Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) or Domestic Violence (DV) refers to the physical, psychological and sexual maltreatment of a partner or spouse.

In this article, we will look at both social science and social history to gauge the nature and extent of such conflicts.

 

1. Facts and Statistics

The Partner Abuse State of Knowledge Project (PASK) lead by John Hamel, is the largest and most comprehensive IPV/DV research database available. The PASK team has reviewed over 2000 studies investigating partner violence in 89 countries. The data has been organized into tables published with free online access in 5 consecutive special issues of the Partner Abuse journal.^{[1][2][3][4][5]}

The International Dating Violence Study (IDVS) lead by Murray Straus, sought to investigate partner conflicts among university students in 32 countries. The now well-known IDVS has been published with free online access in the Children and Youth Services Review journal.^[6] The study is included in the PASK database but will be specifically mentioned where necessary.

The following are summarized lists of facts and statistics obtained from 8 PASK manuscripts.

Building A SafeSpace™ Is Easier Than You Think, Ladies!

By Janet Bloomfield (aka JudgyBitch): If feminist media is anything to go by, the state of the world for women in the West has never been worse! Under constant threat of misogynist violence, we innocent, delicate creatures must daily run the gauntlet of scourges like manspreading, mansplaining, manbreathing and manslamming. Why, I could walk out my door right now, get on public transit, and be assaulted by men sitting comfortably! My own personal experiences with misogyny allow me to relate deeply to victims of the Holocaust: they had some trouble on trains, too.
What I, and all women in the West, are desperately in need of is SafeSpace™. Luckily, it turns out there is a space, available to all women, where the risk of violence, assault and sexual harassment is reduced to almost zero, and the protective benefits remain in place as long as one remains in the SafeSpace™ and abides by the rules of that space.
It’s called heterosexual marriage.
Yes, ladies, heterosexual marriage is your best protection against misogyny and violence, and if you have children, being married to the father of those children reduces the risk of violence to yourself and your children even further!
Married women are notably safer than their unmarried peers, and girls raised in a home with their married father are markedly less likely to be abused or assaulted than children living without their own father.

Even LESBIANS Are Tired Of Modern Women's Antics

"Lesbian couples are the most violent!"

Pearl

J4MB Presents A Toady Award To NOMAS (National Organisation for Men Against Sexism)

By Mike Buchanan: There’s a group of people who live even deeper in the gender feminism sewer than female feminists – male feminists. The Denver-based National Organisation for Men Against Sexism (NOMAS) is awash with these men, and claims roots going back to the mid-1970s. The organisation’s strapline:

Pro-feminist, gay-affirmative, anti-racist, enhancing men’s lives.

A pro-feminist organisation “enhancing men’s lives.” You couldn’t make it up, could you?
It would be inadvisable to look through their website http://nomas.org soon after eating a meal, but the thread that runs through it is that men have to change in order that women may become yet more advantaged than they are already – although of course that’s not the spin the website puts on it. The Reading List contains 21 books and papers by Michael Kimmel alone – an internationally infamous feminist poodle. Here’s a taster of what these geniuses believe (from ‘Tenets’):

Whatever psychological burden men have to overcome, women are still the most universal and direct victims of our patriarchy. Our organization must take a highly visible and energetic position in support of women’s struggle for equality. Our movement was born directly out of and continually nourished by feminism. Even if we could not see any pragmatic ways in which we as men could benefit from an end to traditional patriarchy (and we can see many), most of us would strongly support women’s struggle, simply because it is so unquestionably just and right. Our support for women’s rights and specific women’s issues must be vigorous and unmistakable.

Needless to say there aren’t just vile men in NOMAS, there are vile women too, presumably there to stamp hard on any early signs of independent thought amongst the men.

Invisible Dead Men

By William Collins, aka MRA-UK:

Men Killed by Their Partners
The thrust of this post is putting names, and case histories, to the statistics of men killed by their partners. You can skip straight to that, below, if you wish (see the list of 78 names, here or below, or jump to the case histories). However, my motivation for addressing this topic is the ratification of the Istanbul Convention, which, as I write, has just passed its 3rd reading in the House of Commons. More of that shortly. Here I attempt to shine a light on, not just the numbers, but the names and case histories of men’s deaths at the hands of their partners.
In doing this I am acutely aware of apparently committing the same sin as those whom I criticise, namely identity politics. One goes wrong as soon as one speaks of “men” as an undifferentiated slab of people. The male MPs who vote in favour of the Istanbul Convention are hardly to be identified with the dead men discussed below. The correct perspective on these matters is to refer only to “people”. But what is one to do when attempting to redress the gross imbalance which now exists? Let me emphasise, then, that the concentration on male victimisation herein is not intended to hide or minimise female victimisation. But the latter is already very well represented. And no one is attempting to gain political leverage by denying it.

New South Wales Police Openly Address Male Victims Of Female Violence, Jenna Price furious

By Anika Rose: It feels like it never ends: Feminists like Jenna Price of The Canberra Times and Daily Life say they want equality, but when it comes to Domestic Violence, when faced with a serious discussion of male victims, they label it a failure and bitch about statistics.

Recently the New South Wales, Australia Police finally took a progressive step towards addressing the topic of men being victims of Domestic Violence. And before I go much further I would like to say a big thank you to New South Wales (NSW) Police for responding to the people who have requested equal representation of male victims of Domestic Violence. This is what they posted on Facebook:

NSW Police Force
You hear her screaming. The windows breaking.  You see the bruises. The look of fear in the children’s eyes. The police are called.  But don’t assume you know how this story ends. Because she is the one who is arrested.  And he is the innocent victim. He is the one living in fear.  Domestic violence does not discriminate. Last year, 1 in every 5 domestic violence assaults that NSW Police responded to involving intimate partners were for male victims. The NSW Police Force has zero tolerance for domestic violence. You make the call – we’ll make it stop.

Mass Hysteria, Madness And Feminism

By Jan Deichmohle:

History of Mass Hysteria

An early occurrence of a new form of irrationality was surfacing in the age of ‚enlightenment’, when a mob was yelling (rather unenlightened) “Hang to the lanterns, who has a handkerchief!”, and “Hang to the lanterns, who hasn’t got horny skin!”.[i] The people who had soft skin, faced the danger to get lynched.[ii] On the picture above, women lead an armed march of revolutionaries.

Symbol of the French Revolution was an allegorical Marianne, portrayed swinging the tricolour during street fighting. When women and children, the whole family are involved in ideologies, this results in radicalisation. What had been rather a peripheral matter and aberration before, was transformed into a principle, the foundation of a systematically spread hysteria, and was spread along with ideological world views, closed in itself.

Dr. Tanveer Ahmed Scapegoated - Thought Reform And The Psychology Of A Domestic Abuse Charity Part 1

By Isaac T. Quill: In the March 2015 Spectator Australia  “Lynched by the feminist mob-ette“,  Dr. Tanveer Ahmed used a phrase that would have bankrupted all of Las Vegas, it rang so many cherries.

“…a recommitment program to make sure my views were in keeping with the movement”

So many will look at that sentence and see nothing of significance, and yet “recommitment program” is a key to unlock the Pandora’s Box of the institutionalisation that is White Ribbon Australia. I actually see no hope in that box either.

Oppression By Orgasm? God’s Chosen People Gave Us Legalized Pornography

'Doth the lady protest too much? The answer is yes, despite protestations to the contrary all these antisemitic “fantasies” can be proven by citing gloating Jewish pornographers.'

By Kenneth Vinther: Following a series of instances in which porn websites were discovered to be hosting videos depicting the rapes of underage girls (in some cases the platforms refused to take the videos down), some 2 million have since signed a petition to take down a variety of porn sites and prosecute their executives for human trafficking (this scandal recently culminated in a boycott of Pornhub by Mastercard and Visa). In response to increasing anti-pornography sentiment, gaslighting mainstream media publications and academic journals have launched a campaign to smear the anti-pornography movement for encouraging “antisemitism” and “antisemitic conspiracy theories.”