Britain treats its frail children as pawns
in a ghastly game of privilege.
We should all be ashamed.
in a ghastly game of privilege.
We should all be ashamed.
The Slog: On April 13th 2010, in a moment of optimistic triumphalism, and following an investigation by Judge Nicholas Wall, I wrote:
‘It’s taken many years, hundreds of articles and thousands of hours of hard legal work and appeals, but if today’s Times is to be believed, the end is in sight for the Secret Social Worker State.’
Well, it didn’t turn out that way. Judge
Nicholas Wall – then newly appointed to investigate the Secret Family
Courts – obviously made rather too many enemies in the higher echelons
of political paedophile protectors. On December 1st 2012,
he ‘retired as president of the Family Division and head of family
justice on the grounds of ill health’, the Ministry of Justice
announced.
His replacement, however, has been no less
outspoken in criticising Family Court secrecy, and how such a thing is a
gift for systemic paedophilia. Soon after taking over, Lord Justice
Munby opined:
“Both principle and pragmatism demand that
we open the family courts, that we drastically relax the present access
restrictions….we need both more people going into the family courts, and
more information coming out. Each of these is essential; neither alone
is sufficient.”
How right he was – and is. Explaining his
misgivings concerning Part 2 of the Children, Schools and Families Act
2010, Munby posed this question:
“Do the reforms which have taken place meet the criteria I have set
out? Do they even meet the criteria identified by their architect? My
answer to each question can only be a saddened and regretful No!”
The connection between Munby’s observations and today’s massive
coverage of Care Home abuse in Wales isn’t difficult to elucidate. The
link between false Family Court psychiatric testimony and trafficking
broken-home children into the clutches of sexual psychopaths has been
well enough documented by more dedicated reporters than I.
It’s been six years since I first started reporting on this problem,
and so help me I cannot see in what way we are any further on in
protecting Britain’s most vulnerable children. What this depravity
problem requires is a no-holds-barred investigation by specialist
child-molestation cops – free from political interference – into three
key aspects of what is a near-indelible stain upon British justice: (1)
Why has it taken nearly twenty years to free up media information about
the Family Courts; (2) What is the degree of penetration of the social
worker/care system by an organised and powerful network of murderous
perverts; and (3) How is the protection of the guilty allowed to
continue by those we elect to prosecute them?
To suggest that there is no significance to the concentration of
systemic child sex-crimes between Chester and Wrexham is akin to
pretending that house prices are no higher in Surrey than they are in
Lancashire. It is all very well for Welsh police chiefs to say now, in
2013, that “those who are guilty would do well to look over their
shoulders”. Such soundbites are merely more of the media-fixated,
self-conscious bollocks emitted by our policemen these days. What
everyone disturbed by this heinous scandal wants to know is this: when are some arrests going to be made relating to the Richmond child trafficking nightmare?
We have been distracted first by Jimmy Savile’s mania, then by Lord
McAlpine’s whingeing, then by the arrest of everyone at the BBC from
Stuart Hall to Rolf Harris. But in relation to the political ramifications of the Elm House scandal, to date much has been promised – and nothing at all delivered.
Whatever our lowered position in the world today, we the British
should surely have enough pride left to insist that life-destroying
predators be brought to justice….however high their rank in our power
hierarchy. If we are going to disappear down the plughole of Imperial
History, let us at least do so knowing that – right to the very end –
our legal system could bring to nought those who are worth nothing.
No comments:
Post a Comment