- Another year of children being forcibly separated from their fathers in secret courts.
- Another year of fathers driven to suicide by the loss of their family and their barbaric treatment at the hands of our secret courts and the Child Support Agency.
- Another year of broken promises from our politicians who scurry into hiding at the mere whisper of Fathers4Justice.
- Another year of often willful ignorance, disinformation, bigotry and lazy prejudice in the media designed to malign a group whose sole aim is to ensure a child’s human rights to their fathers are enshrined – not abused behind closed doors.
No wonder they call this pitiful excuse for journalism the ‘lamestream’ media when we haven’t heard a single media outlet accurately report the facts.
That’s an inflammatory accusation, so where is the evidence for his claim?
As the 2011 Norgrove report confirmed, fathers have no rights and should have no rights. 200 dads are losing contact with their children every day in secret courts by judges who sit under the Crown. Many of the legally binding court orders fathers have to see their children simply aren’t enforced. The CSA has reduced fathers to the status of sperm banks and cashpoints.
(If Ian wants to read our fact sheet he can find it here http://www.fathers-4-justice.org/about-f4j/fact-sheet/ )
We are a nation of first-class fathers, treated as second-class parents. And increasingly, many of us feel like outlaws in our own country.
As a result of this demonisation and denigration of fatherhood, millions of children will have little or no contact with their fathers this Father’s Day. As the Centre for Social Justice said this week, up to 75% of children in inner cities live without their fathers in what they called ‘father deserts’.
So what do we do? Just sit back and do nothing?
Did Ian Douglas want us to engage with our political classes? If he had been paying attention he would know we spent five long years, engaged with the political establishment. For what? Ten broken Tory promises, and for just three MP’s out of 650 to turn up to the Shared Parenting meeting held by George Galloway MP in Parliament on Wednesday.
If journalists like Ian Douglas really cared about this issue, it shouldn’t have taken a man with a spray can sending a message to the Queen in Westminster Abbey for Father’s Day to make him write about it.
To that extent, Ian Douglas has proven this point, rather than made his. As far as I can see – he hasn’t written a single article about the family courts.
The media simply can’t help themselves. The coverage for our cause is at best grudging, maligning, loaded with disdain and insult. ‘Heavy handed’ said Channel 4 news earlier this week. But thus as it ever was.
There is an old man dying in South Africa at the moment. 30 years ago he was called a terrorist by the mainstream media. I know, because I was in the anti-apartheid movement. Now he is venerated. We’ve just celebrated 100 years of the Suffragettes, yet we are expected to condemn a man for carrying out similar actions http://www.heretical.com/suffrage/1914tms2.html
Back in 1914, Ian Douglas would have been the journalist calling suffragist Mary Richardson ‘deranged’, accusing her of ‘setting back the cause of Women’s suffrage back by a decade’.
If Tim Haries had sprayed ‘help’ on a portrait of the Chinese Premier, he would have be a dissident hero celebrated by the West. God knows, if he had committed this act in Russia wearing a neon pink Balaclava and his underwear, Madonna would be singing about him and Angelina Jolie would have adopted him.
But the vision of our society has become so distorted and twisted, that our Prime Minister (who condemned dads on Father’s Day 2011) today says he wants the ‘Syrian opposition to succeed’ by violence, but says nothing about dads succeeding in their fight to see their children using peace and love.
The state have destroyed this man and his family in an act of capital punishment, and yet we expect him to do nothing. We have suffocated him, denied him any voice or representation in our country – by the very people who are the first to condemn him. Yet we expect him to comply, quietly, conveniently as the rest of society turns a blind eye to the national emergency that is mass fatherlessness.
I hope Ian Douglas doesn’t have any children and I hope his children don’t have any either. For his sake, statistically, the cancer of family breakdown will happen to him and when it does – when he can’t see his children or grandchildren – I want to see how far he will go for his family.
I know I would do anything for my children. What would you do Ian?
As Martin Luther King Jr wrote fifty years ago in his letter from Birmingham Jail, “…though I was initially disappointed at being categorized as an extremist, as I continued to think about the matter I gradually gained a measure of satisfaction from the label. Was not Jesus an extremist for love? Will we be extremists for hate or for love?”
Source
banzai7
Why would a dad deface the Queen of England? http://goodmenproject.com/international-mens-movement/why-would-a-dad-deface-the-queen-of-england/
“Fathers4Justice have just set back dads’ rights by decades.” http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/mother-tongue/fatherhood/10120963/Fathers-Day-Fathers4Justice-have-just-set-back-fathers-rights-by-decades.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/06/14/fathers4justice-tim-haries-queen_n_3441137.html
Our 10 Point Blueprint for Family Law
In 2004 Fathers4Justice published it’s Blueprint for Family Law in the 21st Century which presented the case for urgent, radical reform of the family justice system. This vital document sets our how an open, transparent and accountable family justice system would work for the benefit of children and families, free from the secrecy and conflict driven processes which have driven so many families apart.
The key principles of this document are:
1. A right in law for parents to have a meaningful
parenting relationship with their children that reflects the status quo
before separation. The burden of proof should be on the state to deny
children access to a parent.
2. A right in law for grandparents to have a
meaningful relationship with their grandchildren that reflects the
status quo before separation.
3. A legal presumption of ‘shared’ or ‘equal’
parenting based upon the status quo before separation with a default
50/50 starting point.
4. The effective enforcement of court orders,
including the transfer of residence from a recalcitrant parent. Parents
who deny contact should not be able to act with impunity.
5. Mandatory mediation and education courses about
the effects of family breakdown prior to the engagement of legal
representatives and court action.
6. The introduction of an open, transparent and
accountable system of justice predicated on peaceful resolution, not
conflict and delay. Courts are for criminals, not families.
7. The removal of an unelected, unaccountable and
unsackable judiciary who operate in complete secrecy. Such a system is
an affront to a progressive, modern democracy.
8. The ending of the lie that the courts act in
‘the child’s best interests’ and the introduction of a record-keeping
system on the outcomes for children.
9. Reform of child support legislation so that
‘child support’ means emotional and financial support and to ensure
benefits are divided equally between both parents.
10. The introduction of a Bill of Rights and
Responsibilities for Parents and the launch of a Public Enquiry into the
Family Justice System.
No comments:
Post a Comment