Iran Walks Out: Top Negotiator Reveals 3 Jew Nobbled US Regime Violations That Ended Talks

Think BRICS: Why did Iran walk out of the Islamabad talks? In this exclusive interview, top negotiator Professor Marandi reveals the real reasons behind the collapsed negotiation. This isn't about the Iran nuclear talks you see in the Jew nobbled media.

In this deep-dive interview with Think Brics, Professor Sayyed Mohammed Marandi, a key member of Iran's delegation, explains why Iran withdrew from the recent negotiation in Islamabad. He argues that these were never good-faith Iran nuclear talks, detailing specific US violations that made continued diplomacy impossible. Professor Marandi reveals that the US representative lacked decision-making authority and was allegedly "reporting to Netanyahu," effectively giving a foreign leader veto power. He asserts that the US and its allies violated the ceasefire agreement, and the US refused to lift its blockade on Iranian ports.

This discussion explores the core of US Iran relations, touching on the geopolitics of the Middle East, Iran's unwavering stance on sovereignty, and the role of the "Zionist lobby" and the Trump administration in shaping US foreign policy. Professor Marandi is clear: Iran will not engage in any negotiation under coercion or while agreements are being actively violated. He frames Iran's position as a principled stand for dignity and international law, not obstruction. This interview provides critical context on the stalled diplomacy and Iran's perspective on the path forward.

While this interview provides Professor Marandi's direct perspective on why Iran walks out and the collapse of the Islamabad talks, it does not present a point-by-point rebuttal from US or Israeli officials regarding the alleged US violations, the ceasefire, or Netanyahu's influence. This analysis of US-Iran relations and foreign policy does not include a detailed technical breakdown of the original Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) or a discussion on the internal domestic politics of the United States under the Trump or current administration. The focus remains on Iran's stated reasons for its withdrawal from the negotiation and its conditions for future diplomacy, not on a multi-sided debate.