UK Column v The NWO

"Our country is not being governed for our benefit, it is being governed at our expense! ...Codex alimentarius, Agenda 21 and unconstitutional carbon tax all courtesy of an unelected international body who's members are almost certainly in the pay of international corporations. If you are still not concerned about the demise of our constitution, then you should be."

Proposed: How A Smaller, Less Intrusive Government Would Forward The Interests Of Men

By Jeb Kinnison: In response to several articles here, on A Voice for Men and elsewhere about libertarians and men’s rights, I’m prompted to write about the history of government thought control and the means of restraining it by constitutional limitations on its powers. Western governments are more and more intrusive on private decisions, and modern feminists strongly influence their actions and propaganda from their positions in academia, government, and non-profits. 
Restricting government’s powers to interfere in private decisions and control the media message would give private personal decisions more room, and men would benefit.
Feminism started out with a quest for equity in job opportunities, voting, and freedom to choose. This initial agenda (“equity feminism”) won a lot of support from fair-minded men and women, though even then there was a strong element of gynocentrism in the movement.
By choosing to notice only the bad things that happen to women in our own time as well as other cultures and times, modern feminists have failed to work for truly equal treatment of men and women. Instead of seeing individuals and their rights as important, modern feminists and other social justice warriors believe that only a relentless focus on oppression of some categories of individuals by others is the key to righteousness, and their collectivist view of group rights leaves little space for sympathy for anyone who cannot claim membership in an oppressed class.

The Poison Manifesto - The Vanguard Report (14 & 15)

Feminism Poisons Women

A Political Statement

By Fidelbogen: The present statement carries a harshly provocative title. That is deliberate, because the title is a hook. Our main purpose is to excite the reader’s anger or curiosity and inspire further investigation. Our secondary purpose is to leave an indelible mark on the reader’s memory whether the reader agrees with us or not.

So, what is feminism, how does it poison women, and what should we do about this? Our statement will involve these and related questions.

Feminism is many things, but for now it will suffice to know that feminism is antagonistic toward men and all things male. We gain this knowledge both by long study of objective reality and by reasoning from an irrefutable premise: that feminism is the project to increase the power of women. This leads us to wonder precisely how far the feminist project proposes to increase that power, and we are forced to conclude that the project has no clearly stated upper limit.

The problem assumes a particular urgency when you consider that  the growth of female power would hit a wall if it did not, at some point, begin to meld itself with state power. Hence, the feminist project could not but infiltrate the machinery of state, and if pushed far enough could issue only in a totalitarian level of government control – ostensibly for the benefit of women. In light of all this, we must ask if the feminist project means to increase the power of women infinitely? For want of any credible feminist statement to the contrary we must reckon that it does, and make all calculations accordingly.

WAR ON BOYS

PragerUniversity: What ever happened to letting "boys be boys?" Take these two cases: In one, a seven-year-old boy was sent home for nibbling a Pop Tart into a gun. In another, a teacher was so alarmed by a picture drawn by a student (of a sword fight), that the boy's parents were summoned in for a conference. In short, boys in America's schools are routinely punished for being active, competitive, and restless. In other words, boys can no longer be boys. Christina Hoff Sommers, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, explains how we can change this.

Self Hating Comedian-Ginas

bar bar

It Is Time We Had A Talk - MANstream Media

Paul Elam: There is a very strong cultural code of silence about the pain and suffering of men and boys. It is still a career ending move for a lot of people. Talking about the men’s side of the gender story and telling it like it is can still end a career and result in being socially ostracized as well. It will get you shunned by a lot of men and women, get you attacked by the media and send protestors to try to stop you. So for the first program, we are going to talk about not talking, and what we think the solutions are, including the need for men’s groups on the ground. After all, we can’t fix any of men’s problems if we stay silent about them. We will also be talking about the lives of boys, from circumcision at birth, to how they are parented, to what society expects from them, to what society actually gives them.

Are Your Dreams A Lie?

Stefan Molyneux: The great secret of achievement, the momentum of willpower, making stuff happen, a dream not acted on is a delusion and born with your hand in the fire.

End Occupation Or Face ICC: Palestine Will Ask UN To Set 'Timetable' For Israeli Withdrawal

Palestine will ask the UN Security Council to set a “timetable” for Israel's withdrawal from the occupied territories, a senior official said. If the request is denied, Palestine will take senior Israeli officials to the ICC over the killing of thousands.
RT: The Palestinian leadership is going to submit the application to the UN Security Council on September 15, Ma'an News Agency reported, citing senior Fatah official Nabil Shaath.
The document will demand a "timetable" for Israel’s withdrawal from the occupied Palestinian territories.
Photo right: A Palestinian boy collects copies of the Koran from the remains of a mosque, which witnesses said was hit by an Israeli air strike, in Beit Hanoun in the northern Gaza Strip August 25, 2014. (Reuters / Mohammed Salem)
In addition there will be a meeting of the Arab League on September 5 ahead of sending the application to the UN, to discuss how to support the proposal.

If Palestine’s initiative is denied at the UN, it is going to take senior Israeli officials such as Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon to the International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague, over Israel’s assault on Gaza, which left over 2,000 Palestinians dead.
The ICC is an international tribunal to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and the crime of aggression. It is an independent organization, and is not part of the UN system.
"Taking the case to the ICC is conditional upon the Security Council response to our request," Shaath said.

US Federal Cybersecurity Head Convicted Of Child Porn Charges

“A (G-)Man Of Many Perversions”

By Michael Krieger: The following story is a warning as to why centralized power is so dangerous. It doesn’t matter whether the power is political or corporate, overly centralized power in all forms must be resisted whenever it appears. The worst of all worlds is when centralized political and corporate power unite in an unholy alliance, which is what has happened to America in recent decades. When this occurs, the combined forces of oligarchy simply begin to rapaciously feast on the citizenry with zero accountability. This is a fair description of the United States in 2014.
The primary problem with centralized power is that sociopaths (for obvious reasons) gravitate toward, and greatly covet, positions of power. Once entrenched in such positions, they are able to act upon their perversions with general immunity, and if they are caught, are often left in positions of power by others who at that point “own them” via blackmail. This of course is nothing new, it is how the game of power, politics and economics has been played since the beginning of time. It is also why decentralization of power is the natural evolution we as a species must embrace in order to build a better world.
Enter Timothy DeFoggi, the one-time cybersecurity director of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, who received several awards for his government “service” over the years. The self-proclaimed man of “many perversions,” frequented a child porn site called PedoBook where he “exchanged private messages with other members expressing interest in raping, beating and murdering infants and toddlers.”

Bitcoin Independence! Max Keiser and Stacy Herbert with Julia Tourianski

Max Keiser and Stacy Herbert discuss the high cost of helping politicians with low rates . . . from the increase in the cost of raising a child to the Greater Depression in Europe. And yet, it is the voter who reelects the politicians based on cheap money induced house price rises.

The Artificial Womb Will Bring About Men’s Liberation!

By Jack Barnes: A wise man once told me: “If it weren’t for pussy, there would be an open season on women.” Most feminists would scream, “Misogyny!” at that statement. I must admit that I had a similar reaction myself for about half a second. Then I thought about what he said and what it actually meant. It didn’t mean that men would kill women if it weren’t for their vaginas. 
It meant that if men didn’t value vaginas to such a high degree, men would not tolerate an exceeding level of bad behavior from women. After rolling that around in my head for a while, I decided to take a look at the men and women I knew to see if this idea was true. All around me I saw men tolerating behavior from women that they would never tolerate from any man. From my own observations, I concluded that there was a grain of truth behind what that old man had said. Men value women so much, most are willing to tolerate abhorrent behavior from the “fairer” sex.
The feminist and MHRM communities have been buzzing lately with the idea of an artificial uterus. Women would no longer have to carry babies inside them but could grow them at home, like tomatoes. This technology may never be possible. However, if human history teaches us anything, it’s that what women want, they get. Then again, I don’t think all women will embrace this new technology. I think many women will opt for the experience of feeling their child grow inside them rather than in the controlled environment of an artificial womb.

Lay-Z Myers & Hardon Ra Sitting In A Tree.....

"...Since the sixties, feminists have just been standing about scratching their ass waiting on the internet's arrival before they could know what their fucking goals were!?" 6oodfella .....T.A.L.K.I.N.G.S.H.I.T.